Cargando…

Anatomical Modeling and Optimization of Speckle Contrast Optical Tomography

Traditional methods for mapping cerebral blood flow (CBF), such as positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, offer only isolated snapshots of CBF due to scanner logistics. Speckle contrast optical tomography (SCOT) is a promising optical technique for mapping CBF. However, while S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Chen-Hao P., Orukari, Inema, Frisk, Lisa Kobayashi, Verma, Manish, Chetia, Sumana, Beslija, Faruk, Eggebrecht, Adam T., Durduran, Turgut, Culver, Joseph P., Trobaugh, Jason W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37732196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.06.556565
_version_ 1785107603621150720
author Lin, Chen-Hao P.
Orukari, Inema
Frisk, Lisa Kobayashi
Verma, Manish
Chetia, Sumana
Beslija, Faruk
Eggebrecht, Adam T.
Durduran, Turgut
Culver, Joseph P.
Trobaugh, Jason W.
author_facet Lin, Chen-Hao P.
Orukari, Inema
Frisk, Lisa Kobayashi
Verma, Manish
Chetia, Sumana
Beslija, Faruk
Eggebrecht, Adam T.
Durduran, Turgut
Culver, Joseph P.
Trobaugh, Jason W.
author_sort Lin, Chen-Hao P.
collection PubMed
description Traditional methods for mapping cerebral blood flow (CBF), such as positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, offer only isolated snapshots of CBF due to scanner logistics. Speckle contrast optical tomography (SCOT) is a promising optical technique for mapping CBF. However, while SCOT has been established in mice, the method has not yet been demonstrated in humans - partly due to a lack of anatomical reconstruction methods and uncertainty over the optimal design parameters. Herein we develop SCOT reconstruction methods that leverage MRI-based anatomical head models and finite-element modeling of the SCOT forward problem (NIRFASTer). We then simulate SCOT for CBF perturbations to evaluate sensitivity of imaging performance to exposure time and SD-distances. We find image resolution comparable to intensity-based diffuse optical tomography at superficial cortical tissue depth (~1.5 cm). Localization errors can be reduced by including longer SD-measurements. With longer exposure times speckle contrast decreases, however, noise decreases faster, resulting in a net increase in SNR. Specifically, extending exposure time from 10μs to 10ms increased SCOT SNR by 1000X. Overall, our modeling methods provide anatomically-based image reconstructions that can be used to evaluate a broad range of tissue conditions, measurement parameters, and noise sources and inform SCOT system design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10508753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105087532023-09-20 Anatomical Modeling and Optimization of Speckle Contrast Optical Tomography Lin, Chen-Hao P. Orukari, Inema Frisk, Lisa Kobayashi Verma, Manish Chetia, Sumana Beslija, Faruk Eggebrecht, Adam T. Durduran, Turgut Culver, Joseph P. Trobaugh, Jason W. bioRxiv Article Traditional methods for mapping cerebral blood flow (CBF), such as positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, offer only isolated snapshots of CBF due to scanner logistics. Speckle contrast optical tomography (SCOT) is a promising optical technique for mapping CBF. However, while SCOT has been established in mice, the method has not yet been demonstrated in humans - partly due to a lack of anatomical reconstruction methods and uncertainty over the optimal design parameters. Herein we develop SCOT reconstruction methods that leverage MRI-based anatomical head models and finite-element modeling of the SCOT forward problem (NIRFASTer). We then simulate SCOT for CBF perturbations to evaluate sensitivity of imaging performance to exposure time and SD-distances. We find image resolution comparable to intensity-based diffuse optical tomography at superficial cortical tissue depth (~1.5 cm). Localization errors can be reduced by including longer SD-measurements. With longer exposure times speckle contrast decreases, however, noise decreases faster, resulting in a net increase in SNR. Specifically, extending exposure time from 10μs to 10ms increased SCOT SNR by 1000X. Overall, our modeling methods provide anatomically-based image reconstructions that can be used to evaluate a broad range of tissue conditions, measurement parameters, and noise sources and inform SCOT system design. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10508753/ /pubmed/37732196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.06.556565 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Lin, Chen-Hao P.
Orukari, Inema
Frisk, Lisa Kobayashi
Verma, Manish
Chetia, Sumana
Beslija, Faruk
Eggebrecht, Adam T.
Durduran, Turgut
Culver, Joseph P.
Trobaugh, Jason W.
Anatomical Modeling and Optimization of Speckle Contrast Optical Tomography
title Anatomical Modeling and Optimization of Speckle Contrast Optical Tomography
title_full Anatomical Modeling and Optimization of Speckle Contrast Optical Tomography
title_fullStr Anatomical Modeling and Optimization of Speckle Contrast Optical Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Anatomical Modeling and Optimization of Speckle Contrast Optical Tomography
title_short Anatomical Modeling and Optimization of Speckle Contrast Optical Tomography
title_sort anatomical modeling and optimization of speckle contrast optical tomography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37732196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.06.556565
work_keys_str_mv AT linchenhaop anatomicalmodelingandoptimizationofspecklecontrastopticaltomography
AT orukariinema anatomicalmodelingandoptimizationofspecklecontrastopticaltomography
AT frisklisakobayashi anatomicalmodelingandoptimizationofspecklecontrastopticaltomography
AT vermamanish anatomicalmodelingandoptimizationofspecklecontrastopticaltomography
AT chetiasumana anatomicalmodelingandoptimizationofspecklecontrastopticaltomography
AT beslijafaruk anatomicalmodelingandoptimizationofspecklecontrastopticaltomography
AT eggebrechtadamt anatomicalmodelingandoptimizationofspecklecontrastopticaltomography
AT durduranturgut anatomicalmodelingandoptimizationofspecklecontrastopticaltomography
AT culverjosephp anatomicalmodelingandoptimizationofspecklecontrastopticaltomography
AT trobaughjasonw anatomicalmodelingandoptimizationofspecklecontrastopticaltomography