Cargando…

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy cycle number selection for non-small cell lung cancer and clinical outcomes: a real-world analysis

OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is the optimal choice in the treatment of NSCLC; however, the optimal number of therapeutic cycles remains unclear. The primary aim of this study was to determine the optimal number of neoadjuvant therapeutic cycles in NSCLC. METHODS: This study was a real-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Baihua, Guo, Xiaotong, Jia, Ran, Wang, Zhan, Wu, Jie, Chen, Xiaoyan, Li, Jigang, Yang, Desong, Li, Xu, Wang, Wenxiang, Xiao, Qin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731645
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1200625
_version_ 1785107636946993152
author Zhang, Baihua
Guo, Xiaotong
Jia, Ran
Wang, Zhan
Wu, Jie
Chen, Xiaoyan
Li, Jigang
Yang, Desong
Li, Xu
Wang, Wenxiang
Xiao, Qin
author_facet Zhang, Baihua
Guo, Xiaotong
Jia, Ran
Wang, Zhan
Wu, Jie
Chen, Xiaoyan
Li, Jigang
Yang, Desong
Li, Xu
Wang, Wenxiang
Xiao, Qin
author_sort Zhang, Baihua
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is the optimal choice in the treatment of NSCLC; however, the optimal number of therapeutic cycles remains unclear. The primary aim of this study was to determine the optimal number of neoadjuvant therapeutic cycles in NSCLC. METHODS: This study was a real-world clinical analysis that included patients who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by surgery from January 2020 to August 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on the number of therapeutic cycles: 2-cycle group and 3-4-cycles group. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR) rate. RESULTS: A total of 251 patients were included: 150 in the 2-cycle group and 101 in the 3-4-cycles group. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the groups. The MPR in the 2-cycle group was 57.3% and not significantly different from that of 57.4% in the 3-4-cycles group (p=0.529). Thirty-two patients (31.7%) in the 3-4-cycles group underwent surgery > 42 days after the final cycle of neoadjuvant therapy, significantly more than the 24 patients (16.0%) in the 2-cycle group (p=0.003). The incidence of adverse events related to neoadjuvant therapy was higher in the 3-4-cycles vs 2-cycle groups (72.3% versus 58.0%, respectively; p=0.021), while the 2-cycle group had a higher rate of postoperative morbidities (28.0% versus 12.9%, respectively; p=0.004). Additionally, for patients with ≤ 44.2% regression in diameter on computed tomography after two cycles of treatment, the MPR rate was higher in the 3-4-cycles vs 2-cycle group (47.3% versus 29.9%, respectively; p=0.048). For cases with programmed death-ligand 1 expression, regarding tumor proportion score ≤ 10%, 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment increased the MPR rate compared with 2 cycles (37.5% versus 9.5%, respectively; p=0.041). CONCLUSION: Our data support the positive role of chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of NSCLC. Extending to 3–4 cycles instead of 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy may improve the safety of surgery and result in a lower incidence of postoperative morbidities; however, the MPR rate may not increase significantly. CT re-evaluation during treatment and PD-L1 expression at initial diagnosis are potential indicators to guide the choice of the number of therapeutic cycles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10508959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105089592023-09-20 Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy cycle number selection for non-small cell lung cancer and clinical outcomes: a real-world analysis Zhang, Baihua Guo, Xiaotong Jia, Ran Wang, Zhan Wu, Jie Chen, Xiaoyan Li, Jigang Yang, Desong Li, Xu Wang, Wenxiang Xiao, Qin Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is the optimal choice in the treatment of NSCLC; however, the optimal number of therapeutic cycles remains unclear. The primary aim of this study was to determine the optimal number of neoadjuvant therapeutic cycles in NSCLC. METHODS: This study was a real-world clinical analysis that included patients who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by surgery from January 2020 to August 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on the number of therapeutic cycles: 2-cycle group and 3-4-cycles group. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR) rate. RESULTS: A total of 251 patients were included: 150 in the 2-cycle group and 101 in the 3-4-cycles group. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the groups. The MPR in the 2-cycle group was 57.3% and not significantly different from that of 57.4% in the 3-4-cycles group (p=0.529). Thirty-two patients (31.7%) in the 3-4-cycles group underwent surgery > 42 days after the final cycle of neoadjuvant therapy, significantly more than the 24 patients (16.0%) in the 2-cycle group (p=0.003). The incidence of adverse events related to neoadjuvant therapy was higher in the 3-4-cycles vs 2-cycle groups (72.3% versus 58.0%, respectively; p=0.021), while the 2-cycle group had a higher rate of postoperative morbidities (28.0% versus 12.9%, respectively; p=0.004). Additionally, for patients with ≤ 44.2% regression in diameter on computed tomography after two cycles of treatment, the MPR rate was higher in the 3-4-cycles vs 2-cycle group (47.3% versus 29.9%, respectively; p=0.048). For cases with programmed death-ligand 1 expression, regarding tumor proportion score ≤ 10%, 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment increased the MPR rate compared with 2 cycles (37.5% versus 9.5%, respectively; p=0.041). CONCLUSION: Our data support the positive role of chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of NSCLC. Extending to 3–4 cycles instead of 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy may improve the safety of surgery and result in a lower incidence of postoperative morbidities; however, the MPR rate may not increase significantly. CT re-evaluation during treatment and PD-L1 expression at initial diagnosis are potential indicators to guide the choice of the number of therapeutic cycles. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10508959/ /pubmed/37731645 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1200625 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Guo, Jia, Wang, Wu, Chen, Li, Yang, Li, Wang and Xiao https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhang, Baihua
Guo, Xiaotong
Jia, Ran
Wang, Zhan
Wu, Jie
Chen, Xiaoyan
Li, Jigang
Yang, Desong
Li, Xu
Wang, Wenxiang
Xiao, Qin
Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy cycle number selection for non-small cell lung cancer and clinical outcomes: a real-world analysis
title Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy cycle number selection for non-small cell lung cancer and clinical outcomes: a real-world analysis
title_full Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy cycle number selection for non-small cell lung cancer and clinical outcomes: a real-world analysis
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy cycle number selection for non-small cell lung cancer and clinical outcomes: a real-world analysis
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy cycle number selection for non-small cell lung cancer and clinical outcomes: a real-world analysis
title_short Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy cycle number selection for non-small cell lung cancer and clinical outcomes: a real-world analysis
title_sort neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy cycle number selection for non-small cell lung cancer and clinical outcomes: a real-world analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731645
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1200625
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangbaihua neoadjuvantchemoimmunotherapycyclenumberselectionfornonsmallcelllungcancerandclinicaloutcomesarealworldanalysis
AT guoxiaotong neoadjuvantchemoimmunotherapycyclenumberselectionfornonsmallcelllungcancerandclinicaloutcomesarealworldanalysis
AT jiaran neoadjuvantchemoimmunotherapycyclenumberselectionfornonsmallcelllungcancerandclinicaloutcomesarealworldanalysis
AT wangzhan neoadjuvantchemoimmunotherapycyclenumberselectionfornonsmallcelllungcancerandclinicaloutcomesarealworldanalysis
AT wujie neoadjuvantchemoimmunotherapycyclenumberselectionfornonsmallcelllungcancerandclinicaloutcomesarealworldanalysis
AT chenxiaoyan neoadjuvantchemoimmunotherapycyclenumberselectionfornonsmallcelllungcancerandclinicaloutcomesarealworldanalysis
AT lijigang neoadjuvantchemoimmunotherapycyclenumberselectionfornonsmallcelllungcancerandclinicaloutcomesarealworldanalysis
AT yangdesong neoadjuvantchemoimmunotherapycyclenumberselectionfornonsmallcelllungcancerandclinicaloutcomesarealworldanalysis
AT lixu neoadjuvantchemoimmunotherapycyclenumberselectionfornonsmallcelllungcancerandclinicaloutcomesarealworldanalysis
AT wangwenxiang neoadjuvantchemoimmunotherapycyclenumberselectionfornonsmallcelllungcancerandclinicaloutcomesarealworldanalysis
AT xiaoqin neoadjuvantchemoimmunotherapycyclenumberselectionfornonsmallcelllungcancerandclinicaloutcomesarealworldanalysis