Cargando…
Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Education of Oncology Medical Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review
As cancer continues to be a significant global health challenge, the education of oncology professionals plays a crucial role in providing quality cancer care and achieving optimal patient outcomes. In order to meet the growing need for flexible, accessible, and effective training, this study examin...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37365373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-023-02329-1 |
_version_ | 1785107657480208384 |
---|---|
author | Kulaksız, Taibe Steinbacher, Jana Kalz, Marco |
author_facet | Kulaksız, Taibe Steinbacher, Jana Kalz, Marco |
author_sort | Kulaksız, Taibe |
collection | PubMed |
description | As cancer continues to be a significant global health challenge, the education of oncology professionals plays a crucial role in providing quality cancer care and achieving optimal patient outcomes. In order to meet the growing need for flexible, accessible, and effective training, this study examines the role of technology-enhanced learning (TEL) in the education of oncology medical professionals. Following the PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review included 34 articles published between 2012 and 2022 in EBSCO and PubMed databases. Findings reveal a diverse range of digital tools being used in oncology training, despite a shortage of advanced educational technologies and limited functional improvement compared to traditional instruction. Since the training primarily targeted at multiple professions in the medical expert role, with radiation oncologists being overrepresented, other oncology domains should be examined more thoroughly in the future, taking into account distinct professional abilities, e.g. communication, collaboration, and leadership skills with reference to the CanMEDS framework. Although the training programmes generally resulted in positive outcomes according to the Kirkpatrick evaluation model, experimental research designs were rather limited. Therefore, the substantial contribution and limitations of TEL in oncology education need to be clarified. Precise reporting of digital tools and instructional processes, as well as challenges encountered, is highly recommended to increase transparency and replicability. Research methodology in digital oncology education remains a major concern and should be addressed accordingly in future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13187-023-02329-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10509048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105090482023-09-21 Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Education of Oncology Medical Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review Kulaksız, Taibe Steinbacher, Jana Kalz, Marco J Cancer Educ Article As cancer continues to be a significant global health challenge, the education of oncology professionals plays a crucial role in providing quality cancer care and achieving optimal patient outcomes. In order to meet the growing need for flexible, accessible, and effective training, this study examines the role of technology-enhanced learning (TEL) in the education of oncology medical professionals. Following the PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review included 34 articles published between 2012 and 2022 in EBSCO and PubMed databases. Findings reveal a diverse range of digital tools being used in oncology training, despite a shortage of advanced educational technologies and limited functional improvement compared to traditional instruction. Since the training primarily targeted at multiple professions in the medical expert role, with radiation oncologists being overrepresented, other oncology domains should be examined more thoroughly in the future, taking into account distinct professional abilities, e.g. communication, collaboration, and leadership skills with reference to the CanMEDS framework. Although the training programmes generally resulted in positive outcomes according to the Kirkpatrick evaluation model, experimental research designs were rather limited. Therefore, the substantial contribution and limitations of TEL in oncology education need to be clarified. Precise reporting of digital tools and instructional processes, as well as challenges encountered, is highly recommended to increase transparency and replicability. Research methodology in digital oncology education remains a major concern and should be addressed accordingly in future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13187-023-02329-1. Springer US 2023-06-26 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10509048/ /pubmed/37365373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-023-02329-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kulaksız, Taibe Steinbacher, Jana Kalz, Marco Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Education of Oncology Medical Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review |
title | Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Education of Oncology Medical Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full | Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Education of Oncology Medical Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Education of Oncology Medical Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Education of Oncology Medical Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_short | Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Education of Oncology Medical Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_sort | technology-enhanced learning in the education of oncology medical professionals: a systematic literature review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37365373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-023-02329-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kulaksıztaibe technologyenhancedlearningintheeducationofoncologymedicalprofessionalsasystematicliteraturereview AT steinbacherjana technologyenhancedlearningintheeducationofoncologymedicalprofessionalsasystematicliteraturereview AT kalzmarco technologyenhancedlearningintheeducationofoncologymedicalprofessionalsasystematicliteraturereview |