Cargando…

Evaluation of the clinical safety and performance of a narrow diameter (2.9 mm) bone-level implant: a 1-year prospective single-arm multicenter study

PURPOSE: Narrow-diameter implants facilitate single‐tooth restoration when interdental or inter-implant spaces and bone volume are inadequate for using standard diameter implants. This study reports the short-term data on the clinical safety and performance of a bone-level-tapered two-piece implant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walter, Christian, Sagheb, Keyvan, Blatt, Sebastian, Klein, Marcus Oliver, Herrmann, Jan, Kleinheinz, Johannes, Al-Nawas, Bilal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37725234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00495-x
_version_ 1785107670944972800
author Walter, Christian
Sagheb, Keyvan
Blatt, Sebastian
Klein, Marcus Oliver
Herrmann, Jan
Kleinheinz, Johannes
Al-Nawas, Bilal
author_facet Walter, Christian
Sagheb, Keyvan
Blatt, Sebastian
Klein, Marcus Oliver
Herrmann, Jan
Kleinheinz, Johannes
Al-Nawas, Bilal
author_sort Walter, Christian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Narrow-diameter implants facilitate single‐tooth restoration when interdental or inter-implant spaces and bone volume are inadequate for using standard diameter implants. This study reports the short-term data on the clinical safety and performance of a bone-level-tapered two-piece implant with a 2.9 mm diameter in the clinical practice setting. This study was retrospectively registered on March 1st, 2016 (NCT02699866). METHODS: Implants were placed in partially healed extraction sockets of the central and lateral incisors in the mandible and lateral incisors in the maxilla for single-tooth replacement. The primary outcome was to assess implant survival at 12 months after placement. Secondary outcomes included implant success, pink esthetic score, marginal bone-level changes, and safety. RESULTS: Twenty four males and 17 females with a mean age of 44.5 (± 18.3 standard deviation) received the implant. Three out of 41 implants were lost yielding a survival rate of 92.7% (95%-CI: 79.0%; 97.6%) at 1 year. One patient reported an ongoing foreign body sensation, pain, and/or dysesthesia at month 12. The average pink esthetic score at 6 months was 11.2 (95%-CI: 10.5; 11.9). The bone level was stable with a mean bone-level change of—0.3 mm (± 0.42 mm standard deviation) at 1 year after implantation. No serious adverse events or adverse device events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a 2.9 mm diameter bone-level-tapered implant is a safe and reliable treatment option for narrow tooth gaps at the indicated locations. Overall performance and good survival rates support their use in cases, where wider implants are unsuitable. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10509112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105091122023-09-21 Evaluation of the clinical safety and performance of a narrow diameter (2.9 mm) bone-level implant: a 1-year prospective single-arm multicenter study Walter, Christian Sagheb, Keyvan Blatt, Sebastian Klein, Marcus Oliver Herrmann, Jan Kleinheinz, Johannes Al-Nawas, Bilal Int J Implant Dent Research PURPOSE: Narrow-diameter implants facilitate single‐tooth restoration when interdental or inter-implant spaces and bone volume are inadequate for using standard diameter implants. This study reports the short-term data on the clinical safety and performance of a bone-level-tapered two-piece implant with a 2.9 mm diameter in the clinical practice setting. This study was retrospectively registered on March 1st, 2016 (NCT02699866). METHODS: Implants were placed in partially healed extraction sockets of the central and lateral incisors in the mandible and lateral incisors in the maxilla for single-tooth replacement. The primary outcome was to assess implant survival at 12 months after placement. Secondary outcomes included implant success, pink esthetic score, marginal bone-level changes, and safety. RESULTS: Twenty four males and 17 females with a mean age of 44.5 (± 18.3 standard deviation) received the implant. Three out of 41 implants were lost yielding a survival rate of 92.7% (95%-CI: 79.0%; 97.6%) at 1 year. One patient reported an ongoing foreign body sensation, pain, and/or dysesthesia at month 12. The average pink esthetic score at 6 months was 11.2 (95%-CI: 10.5; 11.9). The bone level was stable with a mean bone-level change of—0.3 mm (± 0.42 mm standard deviation) at 1 year after implantation. No serious adverse events or adverse device events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a 2.9 mm diameter bone-level-tapered implant is a safe and reliable treatment option for narrow tooth gaps at the indicated locations. Overall performance and good survival rates support their use in cases, where wider implants are unsuitable. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10509112/ /pubmed/37725234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00495-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Walter, Christian
Sagheb, Keyvan
Blatt, Sebastian
Klein, Marcus Oliver
Herrmann, Jan
Kleinheinz, Johannes
Al-Nawas, Bilal
Evaluation of the clinical safety and performance of a narrow diameter (2.9 mm) bone-level implant: a 1-year prospective single-arm multicenter study
title Evaluation of the clinical safety and performance of a narrow diameter (2.9 mm) bone-level implant: a 1-year prospective single-arm multicenter study
title_full Evaluation of the clinical safety and performance of a narrow diameter (2.9 mm) bone-level implant: a 1-year prospective single-arm multicenter study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the clinical safety and performance of a narrow diameter (2.9 mm) bone-level implant: a 1-year prospective single-arm multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the clinical safety and performance of a narrow diameter (2.9 mm) bone-level implant: a 1-year prospective single-arm multicenter study
title_short Evaluation of the clinical safety and performance of a narrow diameter (2.9 mm) bone-level implant: a 1-year prospective single-arm multicenter study
title_sort evaluation of the clinical safety and performance of a narrow diameter (2.9 mm) bone-level implant: a 1-year prospective single-arm multicenter study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37725234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00495-x
work_keys_str_mv AT walterchristian evaluationoftheclinicalsafetyandperformanceofanarrowdiameter29mmbonelevelimplanta1yearprospectivesinglearmmulticenterstudy
AT saghebkeyvan evaluationoftheclinicalsafetyandperformanceofanarrowdiameter29mmbonelevelimplanta1yearprospectivesinglearmmulticenterstudy
AT blattsebastian evaluationoftheclinicalsafetyandperformanceofanarrowdiameter29mmbonelevelimplanta1yearprospectivesinglearmmulticenterstudy
AT kleinmarcusoliver evaluationoftheclinicalsafetyandperformanceofanarrowdiameter29mmbonelevelimplanta1yearprospectivesinglearmmulticenterstudy
AT herrmannjan evaluationoftheclinicalsafetyandperformanceofanarrowdiameter29mmbonelevelimplanta1yearprospectivesinglearmmulticenterstudy
AT kleinheinzjohannes evaluationoftheclinicalsafetyandperformanceofanarrowdiameter29mmbonelevelimplanta1yearprospectivesinglearmmulticenterstudy
AT alnawasbilal evaluationoftheclinicalsafetyandperformanceofanarrowdiameter29mmbonelevelimplanta1yearprospectivesinglearmmulticenterstudy