Cargando…

Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds”

In their recent paper, Hansen Wheat et al. (Ecology and Evolution, 2022, 12, e9299) claimed that hand raised 23‐week‐old wolves showed the same attachment behaviour towards their handler in the Strange Situation Test (SST) (Determinants of infant behavior, 1969, 4, 111) as dogs. At first glance, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gácsi, Márta, Miklósi, Ádám, Topál, József
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37736282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10514
_version_ 1785107678288150528
author Gácsi, Márta
Miklósi, Ádám
Topál, József
author_facet Gácsi, Márta
Miklósi, Ádám
Topál, József
author_sort Gácsi, Márta
collection PubMed
description In their recent paper, Hansen Wheat et al. (Ecology and Evolution, 2022, 12, e9299) claimed that hand raised 23‐week‐old wolves showed the same attachment behaviour towards their handler in the Strange Situation Test (SST) (Determinants of infant behavior, 1969, 4, 111) as dogs. At first glance, their results seem to contradict previous findings that domestication caused a unique change in social‐affiliative behaviours in dogs (Animal Behaviour, 2005, 70, 1367). We argue that no persuading evidence was presented to claim that “wolves can show attachment behaviours towards humans comparable to those of dogs”. When dealing with a behaviour system (Child Development, 1977, 48, 1184), the subjects' behaviour must meet consistent criteria (Behavioural and Brain Science, 1978, 3, 417), and a few behavioural preferences should not be used to claim the presence of an attachment system, especially, if the experiment violates basic assumptions of the original test. We believe the intriguing scientific question is whether the dog‐owner relationship is qualitatively different from what could be observed in the wolf‐hand raiser relation. Assessing all available data, our answer is still yes; dogs are unique in this respect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10509145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105091452023-09-21 Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds” Gácsi, Márta Miklósi, Ádám Topál, József Ecol Evol Letters to the Editor In their recent paper, Hansen Wheat et al. (Ecology and Evolution, 2022, 12, e9299) claimed that hand raised 23‐week‐old wolves showed the same attachment behaviour towards their handler in the Strange Situation Test (SST) (Determinants of infant behavior, 1969, 4, 111) as dogs. At first glance, their results seem to contradict previous findings that domestication caused a unique change in social‐affiliative behaviours in dogs (Animal Behaviour, 2005, 70, 1367). We argue that no persuading evidence was presented to claim that “wolves can show attachment behaviours towards humans comparable to those of dogs”. When dealing with a behaviour system (Child Development, 1977, 48, 1184), the subjects' behaviour must meet consistent criteria (Behavioural and Brain Science, 1978, 3, 417), and a few behavioural preferences should not be used to claim the presence of an attachment system, especially, if the experiment violates basic assumptions of the original test. We believe the intriguing scientific question is whether the dog‐owner relationship is qualitatively different from what could be observed in the wolf‐hand raiser relation. Assessing all available data, our answer is still yes; dogs are unique in this respect. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10509145/ /pubmed/37736282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10514 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letters to the Editor
Gácsi, Márta
Miklósi, Ádám
Topál, József
Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds”
title Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds”
title_full Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds”
title_fullStr Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds”
title_full_unstemmed Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds”
title_short Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds”
title_sort comment on “human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds”
topic Letters to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37736282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10514
work_keys_str_mv AT gacsimarta commentonhumandirectedattachmentbehaviourinwolvessuggestsstandingancestralvariationforhumandogattachmentbonds
AT miklosiadam commentonhumandirectedattachmentbehaviourinwolvessuggestsstandingancestralvariationforhumandogattachmentbonds
AT topaljozsef commentonhumandirectedattachmentbehaviourinwolvessuggestsstandingancestralvariationforhumandogattachmentbonds