Cargando…
Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds”
In their recent paper, Hansen Wheat et al. (Ecology and Evolution, 2022, 12, e9299) claimed that hand raised 23‐week‐old wolves showed the same attachment behaviour towards their handler in the Strange Situation Test (SST) (Determinants of infant behavior, 1969, 4, 111) as dogs. At first glance, the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37736282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10514 |
_version_ | 1785107678288150528 |
---|---|
author | Gácsi, Márta Miklósi, Ádám Topál, József |
author_facet | Gácsi, Márta Miklósi, Ádám Topál, József |
author_sort | Gácsi, Márta |
collection | PubMed |
description | In their recent paper, Hansen Wheat et al. (Ecology and Evolution, 2022, 12, e9299) claimed that hand raised 23‐week‐old wolves showed the same attachment behaviour towards their handler in the Strange Situation Test (SST) (Determinants of infant behavior, 1969, 4, 111) as dogs. At first glance, their results seem to contradict previous findings that domestication caused a unique change in social‐affiliative behaviours in dogs (Animal Behaviour, 2005, 70, 1367). We argue that no persuading evidence was presented to claim that “wolves can show attachment behaviours towards humans comparable to those of dogs”. When dealing with a behaviour system (Child Development, 1977, 48, 1184), the subjects' behaviour must meet consistent criteria (Behavioural and Brain Science, 1978, 3, 417), and a few behavioural preferences should not be used to claim the presence of an attachment system, especially, if the experiment violates basic assumptions of the original test. We believe the intriguing scientific question is whether the dog‐owner relationship is qualitatively different from what could be observed in the wolf‐hand raiser relation. Assessing all available data, our answer is still yes; dogs are unique in this respect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10509145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105091452023-09-21 Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds” Gácsi, Márta Miklósi, Ádám Topál, József Ecol Evol Letters to the Editor In their recent paper, Hansen Wheat et al. (Ecology and Evolution, 2022, 12, e9299) claimed that hand raised 23‐week‐old wolves showed the same attachment behaviour towards their handler in the Strange Situation Test (SST) (Determinants of infant behavior, 1969, 4, 111) as dogs. At first glance, their results seem to contradict previous findings that domestication caused a unique change in social‐affiliative behaviours in dogs (Animal Behaviour, 2005, 70, 1367). We argue that no persuading evidence was presented to claim that “wolves can show attachment behaviours towards humans comparable to those of dogs”. When dealing with a behaviour system (Child Development, 1977, 48, 1184), the subjects' behaviour must meet consistent criteria (Behavioural and Brain Science, 1978, 3, 417), and a few behavioural preferences should not be used to claim the presence of an attachment system, especially, if the experiment violates basic assumptions of the original test. We believe the intriguing scientific question is whether the dog‐owner relationship is qualitatively different from what could be observed in the wolf‐hand raiser relation. Assessing all available data, our answer is still yes; dogs are unique in this respect. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10509145/ /pubmed/37736282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10514 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Letters to the Editor Gácsi, Márta Miklósi, Ádám Topál, József Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds” |
title | Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds” |
title_full | Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds” |
title_fullStr | Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds” |
title_full_unstemmed | Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds” |
title_short | Comment on “Human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds” |
title_sort | comment on “human‐directed attachment behaviour in wolves suggests standing ancestral variation for human‐dog attachment bonds” |
topic | Letters to the Editor |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37736282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10514 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gacsimarta commentonhumandirectedattachmentbehaviourinwolvessuggestsstandingancestralvariationforhumandogattachmentbonds AT miklosiadam commentonhumandirectedattachmentbehaviourinwolvessuggestsstandingancestralvariationforhumandogattachmentbonds AT topaljozsef commentonhumandirectedattachmentbehaviourinwolvessuggestsstandingancestralvariationforhumandogattachmentbonds |