Cargando…
In Reply: We do not stand a ghost of a chance of detecting plagiarism with ChatGPT employed as a ghost author
Autor principal: | Homolak, Jan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Croatian Medical Schools
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509679/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2023.64.293 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Should We Acknowledge ChatGPT as an Author?
por: Goto, Atsushi, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both, neither, or forward thinking?
por: Anders, Brent A.
Publicado: (2023) -
Reply to Moreno et al. Comment on “Sallam, M. ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare 2023, 11, 887”
por: Sallam, Malik
Publicado: (2023) -
Use of ChatGPT as a co-author
por: Kleebayoon, A., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Exploring the adoption of ChatGPT in academic publishing: insights and lessons for scientific writing
por: Homolak, Jan
Publicado: (2023)