Cargando…

National Institutes of Health Funding Gaps for Principal Investigators

IMPORTANCE: Early-stage and established investigators compete for a limited supply of funds from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Regardless of their previous funding success, many principal investigators (PIs) encounter a funding gap in which they no longer receive ongoing funding from the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillen, Kelly M., Markowitz, Daniel M., Long, Patricia, Villegas-Estrada, Adriel, Chang, Eileen, Gupta, Ajay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37725378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31905
_version_ 1785107806609735680
author Gillen, Kelly M.
Markowitz, Daniel M.
Long, Patricia
Villegas-Estrada, Adriel
Chang, Eileen
Gupta, Ajay
author_facet Gillen, Kelly M.
Markowitz, Daniel M.
Long, Patricia
Villegas-Estrada, Adriel
Chang, Eileen
Gupta, Ajay
author_sort Gillen, Kelly M.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Early-stage and established investigators compete for a limited supply of funds from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Regardless of their previous funding success, many principal investigators (PIs) encounter a funding gap in which they no longer receive ongoing funding from the NIH. OBJECTIVE: To determine incidence rates of PI-level funding gaps, the mean funding gap length, and whether these 2 metrics are associated with previous funding success. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was conducted using data from NIH RePORTER. Historical datafiles for fiscal year (FY) 2011 to FY 2021 were aggregated to generate 2 master datafiles for this period: all NIH awards and only R01 awards. PIs with no funding in FY 2011 or FY 2021 were removed. PIs were sorted by FY 2011 total funding amounts and grouped by quarter of amount. RESULTS: A total of 39 944 unique researchers were awarded 220 131 NIH awards, of which 103 753 were R01 awards. For all NIH awards, there was an overall linear increase from top quarter to bottom quarter in the percentage of PIs who had at least 1 year without funding (from 27% to 75%), percentage of these gap PIs who had at least 2 consecutive years without funding (from 56% to 68%), and mean maximum consecutive years without funding for gap PIs (2.2 years to 3.1 years). For only R01 awards, there was an overall linear increase from top quarter to bottom quarter in the percentage of PIs who had at least 1 year without funding (50% to 74%), percentage of gap PIs who had at least 2 consecutive years without funding (59% to 71%), and mean maximum consecutive years without funding for gap PIs (2.4 years to 3.1 years). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study of NIH-funded investigators, PIs with higher NIH funding were less likely to experience a funding gap. Additionally, when these PIs encountered a funding gap, this period without funding was shorter; however, among all PIs, funding gaps typically lasted 2 to 3 years. These associations were found inclusive of all NIH awards and when analysis was limited to only R01 awards. These findings may be useful to PIs and academic institutions as they prepare, structure, and project research resource allocations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10509726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105097262023-09-21 National Institutes of Health Funding Gaps for Principal Investigators Gillen, Kelly M. Markowitz, Daniel M. Long, Patricia Villegas-Estrada, Adriel Chang, Eileen Gupta, Ajay JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Early-stage and established investigators compete for a limited supply of funds from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Regardless of their previous funding success, many principal investigators (PIs) encounter a funding gap in which they no longer receive ongoing funding from the NIH. OBJECTIVE: To determine incidence rates of PI-level funding gaps, the mean funding gap length, and whether these 2 metrics are associated with previous funding success. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was conducted using data from NIH RePORTER. Historical datafiles for fiscal year (FY) 2011 to FY 2021 were aggregated to generate 2 master datafiles for this period: all NIH awards and only R01 awards. PIs with no funding in FY 2011 or FY 2021 were removed. PIs were sorted by FY 2011 total funding amounts and grouped by quarter of amount. RESULTS: A total of 39 944 unique researchers were awarded 220 131 NIH awards, of which 103 753 were R01 awards. For all NIH awards, there was an overall linear increase from top quarter to bottom quarter in the percentage of PIs who had at least 1 year without funding (from 27% to 75%), percentage of these gap PIs who had at least 2 consecutive years without funding (from 56% to 68%), and mean maximum consecutive years without funding for gap PIs (2.2 years to 3.1 years). For only R01 awards, there was an overall linear increase from top quarter to bottom quarter in the percentage of PIs who had at least 1 year without funding (50% to 74%), percentage of gap PIs who had at least 2 consecutive years without funding (59% to 71%), and mean maximum consecutive years without funding for gap PIs (2.4 years to 3.1 years). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study of NIH-funded investigators, PIs with higher NIH funding were less likely to experience a funding gap. Additionally, when these PIs encountered a funding gap, this period without funding was shorter; however, among all PIs, funding gaps typically lasted 2 to 3 years. These associations were found inclusive of all NIH awards and when analysis was limited to only R01 awards. These findings may be useful to PIs and academic institutions as they prepare, structure, and project research resource allocations. American Medical Association 2023-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10509726/ /pubmed/37725378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31905 Text en Copyright 2023 Gillen KM et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Gillen, Kelly M.
Markowitz, Daniel M.
Long, Patricia
Villegas-Estrada, Adriel
Chang, Eileen
Gupta, Ajay
National Institutes of Health Funding Gaps for Principal Investigators
title National Institutes of Health Funding Gaps for Principal Investigators
title_full National Institutes of Health Funding Gaps for Principal Investigators
title_fullStr National Institutes of Health Funding Gaps for Principal Investigators
title_full_unstemmed National Institutes of Health Funding Gaps for Principal Investigators
title_short National Institutes of Health Funding Gaps for Principal Investigators
title_sort national institutes of health funding gaps for principal investigators
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37725378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31905
work_keys_str_mv AT gillenkellym nationalinstitutesofhealthfundinggapsforprincipalinvestigators
AT markowitzdanielm nationalinstitutesofhealthfundinggapsforprincipalinvestigators
AT longpatricia nationalinstitutesofhealthfundinggapsforprincipalinvestigators
AT villegasestradaadriel nationalinstitutesofhealthfundinggapsforprincipalinvestigators
AT changeileen nationalinstitutesofhealthfundinggapsforprincipalinvestigators
AT guptaajay nationalinstitutesofhealthfundinggapsforprincipalinvestigators