Cargando…

Modulation of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials during bimanual coordination tasks

INTRODUCTION: Ipsilateral motor evoked potentials (iMEPs) are difficult to obtain in distal upper limb muscles of healthy participants but give a direct insight into the role of ipsilateral motor control. METHODS: We tested a new high-intensity double pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Altermatt, Miriam, Jordan, Harry, Ho, Kelly, Byblow, Winston D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37736146
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1219112
_version_ 1785107814330400768
author Altermatt, Miriam
Jordan, Harry
Ho, Kelly
Byblow, Winston D.
author_facet Altermatt, Miriam
Jordan, Harry
Ho, Kelly
Byblow, Winston D.
author_sort Altermatt, Miriam
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ipsilateral motor evoked potentials (iMEPs) are difficult to obtain in distal upper limb muscles of healthy participants but give a direct insight into the role of ipsilateral motor control. METHODS: We tested a new high-intensity double pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol to elicit iMEPs in wrist extensor and flexor muscles during four different bimanual movements (cooperative—asymmetric, cooperative—symmetric, non-cooperative—asymmetric and non-cooperative—symmetric) in 16 participants. RESULTS: Nine participants showed an iMEP in the wrist extensor in at least 20% of the trials in each of the conditions and were classified as iMEP(+) participants. iMEP persistence was greater for cooperative (50.5 ± 28.8%) compared to non-cooperative (31.6 ± 22.1%) tasks but did not differ between asymmetric and symmetric tasks. Area and amplitude of iMEPs were also increased during cooperative (area = 5.41 ± 3.4 mV × ms; amplitude = 1.60 ± 1.09 mV) compared to non-cooperative (area = 3.89 ± 2.0 mV × ms; amplitude = 1.12 ± 0.56 mV) tasks and unaffected by task-symmetry. DISCUSSION: The upregulation of iMEPs during common-goal cooperative tasks shows a functional relevance of ipsilateral motor control in bimanual movements. The paired-pulse TMS protocol is a reliable method to elicit iMEPs in healthy participants and can give new information about neural control of upper limb movements. With this work we contribute to the research field in two main aspects. First, we describe a reliable method to elicit ipsilateral motor evoked potentials in healthy participants which will be useful in further advancing research in the area of upper limb movements. Second, we add new insight into the motor control of bimanual movements. We were able to show an upregulation of bilateral control represented by increased ipsilateral motor evoked potentials in cooperative, object-oriented movements compared to separate bimanual tasks. This result might also have an impact on neurorehabilitation after stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10509758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105097582023-09-21 Modulation of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials during bimanual coordination tasks Altermatt, Miriam Jordan, Harry Ho, Kelly Byblow, Winston D. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Ipsilateral motor evoked potentials (iMEPs) are difficult to obtain in distal upper limb muscles of healthy participants but give a direct insight into the role of ipsilateral motor control. METHODS: We tested a new high-intensity double pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol to elicit iMEPs in wrist extensor and flexor muscles during four different bimanual movements (cooperative—asymmetric, cooperative—symmetric, non-cooperative—asymmetric and non-cooperative—symmetric) in 16 participants. RESULTS: Nine participants showed an iMEP in the wrist extensor in at least 20% of the trials in each of the conditions and were classified as iMEP(+) participants. iMEP persistence was greater for cooperative (50.5 ± 28.8%) compared to non-cooperative (31.6 ± 22.1%) tasks but did not differ between asymmetric and symmetric tasks. Area and amplitude of iMEPs were also increased during cooperative (area = 5.41 ± 3.4 mV × ms; amplitude = 1.60 ± 1.09 mV) compared to non-cooperative (area = 3.89 ± 2.0 mV × ms; amplitude = 1.12 ± 0.56 mV) tasks and unaffected by task-symmetry. DISCUSSION: The upregulation of iMEPs during common-goal cooperative tasks shows a functional relevance of ipsilateral motor control in bimanual movements. The paired-pulse TMS protocol is a reliable method to elicit iMEPs in healthy participants and can give new information about neural control of upper limb movements. With this work we contribute to the research field in two main aspects. First, we describe a reliable method to elicit ipsilateral motor evoked potentials in healthy participants which will be useful in further advancing research in the area of upper limb movements. Second, we add new insight into the motor control of bimanual movements. We were able to show an upregulation of bilateral control represented by increased ipsilateral motor evoked potentials in cooperative, object-oriented movements compared to separate bimanual tasks. This result might also have an impact on neurorehabilitation after stroke. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10509758/ /pubmed/37736146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1219112 Text en Copyright © 2023 Altermatt, Jordan, Ho and Byblow. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Altermatt, Miriam
Jordan, Harry
Ho, Kelly
Byblow, Winston D.
Modulation of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials during bimanual coordination tasks
title Modulation of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials during bimanual coordination tasks
title_full Modulation of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials during bimanual coordination tasks
title_fullStr Modulation of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials during bimanual coordination tasks
title_full_unstemmed Modulation of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials during bimanual coordination tasks
title_short Modulation of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials during bimanual coordination tasks
title_sort modulation of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials during bimanual coordination tasks
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37736146
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1219112
work_keys_str_mv AT altermattmiriam modulationofipsilateralmotorevokedpotentialsduringbimanualcoordinationtasks
AT jordanharry modulationofipsilateralmotorevokedpotentialsduringbimanualcoordinationtasks
AT hokelly modulationofipsilateralmotorevokedpotentialsduringbimanualcoordinationtasks
AT byblowwinstond modulationofipsilateralmotorevokedpotentialsduringbimanualcoordinationtasks