Adult asthma prevalence and trend analysis by urban–rural status across sociodemographic characteristics—United States, 2012-20

BACKGROUND: Asthma prevalence estimates among adults are limited for urban–rural classification across sociodemographic characteristics. OBJECTIVES: This study examined current asthma prevalence and annual trends by 6-level urban–rural categories across sociodemographic characteristics among US adults. METHODS: Asthma prevalence for 2020 and annual trends for 2012-20 were estimated using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. The 2013 National Center for Health Statistics urban and rural categories were used to define urban–rural status. RESULTS: Current asthma prevalence was higher in medium (9.7%; prevalence ratio 1.103 [95% CI 1.037, 1.174]) and small (9.9%; 1.111 [1.031, 1.197]) metro than in large fringe metropolitan (8.6%), was higher in micropolitan (10.2%) than in both large fringe (8.6%; 1.115 [1.042, 1.194]) and large central metropolitan (8.8%; 1.080 [1.001, 1.066]) areas. Prevalence by sociodemographic characteristics varied between urban–rural scheme; the prevalence was significantly higher among adults aged 55-64 years in micropolitan (11.9%), women in small metro (12.8%), and other race non-Hispanic in noncore (most rural) (13.6%) areas, adults without a high school diploma in micropolitan areas (13.8%), household income <100% of federal poverty level in micropolitan areas (15.7%), and adults with insurance coverage in micropolitan areas (10.3%) compared to the corresponding populations in other urban–rural categories. During 2012-20, an increasing trend in prevalence was observed only in medium metro areas, with an annual percentage change of 0.81. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma prevalence differed by 6-level urban–rural categories. These findings might be helpful in establishing effective asthma control programs and targeting resource allocation at the local level.