Cargando…

Co-producing principles to guide health research: an illustrative case study from an eating disorder research clinic

BACKGROUND: There is significant value in co-produced health research, however power-imbalances within research teams can pose a barrier to people with lived experience of an illness determining the direction of research in that area. This is especially true in eating disorder research, where the in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papastavrou Brooks, Cat, Kafle, Eshika, Butt, Natali, Chawner, Dave, Day, Anna, Elsby-Pearson, Chloë, Elson, Emily, Hammond, John, Herbert, Penny, Jenkins, Catherine L., Johnson, Zach, Keith-Roach, Sarah Helen, Papasileka, Eirini, Reeves, Stella, Stewart, Natasha, Gilbert, Nicola, Startup, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00460-3
_version_ 1785107926978920448
author Papastavrou Brooks, Cat
Kafle, Eshika
Butt, Natali
Chawner, Dave
Day, Anna
Elsby-Pearson, Chloë
Elson, Emily
Hammond, John
Herbert, Penny
Jenkins, Catherine L.
Johnson, Zach
Keith-Roach, Sarah Helen
Papasileka, Eirini
Reeves, Stella
Stewart, Natasha
Gilbert, Nicola
Startup, Helen
author_facet Papastavrou Brooks, Cat
Kafle, Eshika
Butt, Natali
Chawner, Dave
Day, Anna
Elsby-Pearson, Chloë
Elson, Emily
Hammond, John
Herbert, Penny
Jenkins, Catherine L.
Johnson, Zach
Keith-Roach, Sarah Helen
Papasileka, Eirini
Reeves, Stella
Stewart, Natasha
Gilbert, Nicola
Startup, Helen
author_sort Papastavrou Brooks, Cat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is significant value in co-produced health research, however power-imbalances within research teams can pose a barrier to people with lived experience of an illness determining the direction of research in that area. This is especially true in eating disorder research, where the inclusion of co-production approaches lags other research areas. Appealing to principles or values can serve to ground collaborative working. Despite this, there has not been any prior attempt to co-produce principles to guide the work of a research group and serve as a basis for developing future projects. METHODS: The aim of this piece of work was to co-produce a set of principles to guide the conduct of research within our lived experience led research clinic, and to offer an illustrative case for the value of this as a novel co-production methodology. A lived experience panel were recruited to our eating disorder research group. Through an iterative series of workshops with the members of our research clinic (composed of a lived experience panel, clinicians, and researchers) we developed a set of principles which we agreed were important in ensuring both the direction of our research, and the way in which we wanted to work together. RESULTS: Six key principles were developed using this process. They were that research should aim to be: 1) real world—offering a clear and concrete benefit to people with eating disorders, 2) tailored—suitable for marginalised groups and people with atypical diagnoses, 3) hopeful—ensuring that hope for recovery was centred in treatment, 4) experiential—privileging the ‘voice’ of people with eating disorders, 5) broad—encompassing non-standard therapeutic treatments and 6) democratic—co-produced by people with lived experience of eating disorders. CONCLUSIONS: We reflect on some of the positives as well as limitations of the process, highlighting the importance of adequate funding for longer-term co-production approaches to be taken, and issues around ensuring representation of minority groups. We hope that other health research groups will see the value in co-producing principles to guide research in their own fields, and will adapt, develop, and refine this novel methodology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10510247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105102472023-09-21 Co-producing principles to guide health research: an illustrative case study from an eating disorder research clinic Papastavrou Brooks, Cat Kafle, Eshika Butt, Natali Chawner, Dave Day, Anna Elsby-Pearson, Chloë Elson, Emily Hammond, John Herbert, Penny Jenkins, Catherine L. Johnson, Zach Keith-Roach, Sarah Helen Papasileka, Eirini Reeves, Stella Stewart, Natasha Gilbert, Nicola Startup, Helen Res Involv Engagem Methodology BACKGROUND: There is significant value in co-produced health research, however power-imbalances within research teams can pose a barrier to people with lived experience of an illness determining the direction of research in that area. This is especially true in eating disorder research, where the inclusion of co-production approaches lags other research areas. Appealing to principles or values can serve to ground collaborative working. Despite this, there has not been any prior attempt to co-produce principles to guide the work of a research group and serve as a basis for developing future projects. METHODS: The aim of this piece of work was to co-produce a set of principles to guide the conduct of research within our lived experience led research clinic, and to offer an illustrative case for the value of this as a novel co-production methodology. A lived experience panel were recruited to our eating disorder research group. Through an iterative series of workshops with the members of our research clinic (composed of a lived experience panel, clinicians, and researchers) we developed a set of principles which we agreed were important in ensuring both the direction of our research, and the way in which we wanted to work together. RESULTS: Six key principles were developed using this process. They were that research should aim to be: 1) real world—offering a clear and concrete benefit to people with eating disorders, 2) tailored—suitable for marginalised groups and people with atypical diagnoses, 3) hopeful—ensuring that hope for recovery was centred in treatment, 4) experiential—privileging the ‘voice’ of people with eating disorders, 5) broad—encompassing non-standard therapeutic treatments and 6) democratic—co-produced by people with lived experience of eating disorders. CONCLUSIONS: We reflect on some of the positives as well as limitations of the process, highlighting the importance of adequate funding for longer-term co-production approaches to be taken, and issues around ensuring representation of minority groups. We hope that other health research groups will see the value in co-producing principles to guide research in their own fields, and will adapt, develop, and refine this novel methodology. BioMed Central 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10510247/ /pubmed/37730642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00460-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Papastavrou Brooks, Cat
Kafle, Eshika
Butt, Natali
Chawner, Dave
Day, Anna
Elsby-Pearson, Chloë
Elson, Emily
Hammond, John
Herbert, Penny
Jenkins, Catherine L.
Johnson, Zach
Keith-Roach, Sarah Helen
Papasileka, Eirini
Reeves, Stella
Stewart, Natasha
Gilbert, Nicola
Startup, Helen
Co-producing principles to guide health research: an illustrative case study from an eating disorder research clinic
title Co-producing principles to guide health research: an illustrative case study from an eating disorder research clinic
title_full Co-producing principles to guide health research: an illustrative case study from an eating disorder research clinic
title_fullStr Co-producing principles to guide health research: an illustrative case study from an eating disorder research clinic
title_full_unstemmed Co-producing principles to guide health research: an illustrative case study from an eating disorder research clinic
title_short Co-producing principles to guide health research: an illustrative case study from an eating disorder research clinic
title_sort co-producing principles to guide health research: an illustrative case study from an eating disorder research clinic
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00460-3
work_keys_str_mv AT papastavroubrookscat coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT kafleeshika coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT buttnatali coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT chawnerdave coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT dayanna coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT elsbypearsonchloe coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT elsonemily coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT hammondjohn coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT herbertpenny coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT jenkinscatherinel coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT johnsonzach coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT keithroachsarahhelen coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT papasilekaeirini coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT reevesstella coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT stewartnatasha coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT gilbertnicola coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic
AT startuphelen coproducingprinciplestoguidehealthresearchanillustrativecasestudyfromaneatingdisorderresearchclinic