Cargando…

Bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty versus unipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of asymmetric osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a case control study

BACKGROUND: Bipedicular/unipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty are common treatments for OVCF, and there are no studies to show which is more beneficial for AVCF. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of BPKP or UPKP in the treatment of AVCF. METHODS: The clinical data of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Lei, Song, Feifei, Shang, Jie, Zhang, Jianwei, Ma, Chao, Liu, Guangpu, Han, Meng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37726728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02180-7
_version_ 1785107931439562752
author Liu, Lei
Song, Feifei
Shang, Jie
Zhang, Jianwei
Ma, Chao
Liu, Guangpu
Han, Meng
author_facet Liu, Lei
Song, Feifei
Shang, Jie
Zhang, Jianwei
Ma, Chao
Liu, Guangpu
Han, Meng
author_sort Liu, Lei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bipedicular/unipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty are common treatments for OVCF, and there are no studies to show which is more beneficial for AVCF. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of BPKP or UPKP in the treatment of AVCF. METHODS: The clinical data of AVCF patients treated by PKP were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach. General demographic data, perioperative complications, and general information related to surgery were recorded for both groups. The preoperative and postoperative vertebral height difference, vertebral local Cobb angle, lumbar pain VAS score and lumbar JOA score were counted for both groups. The above data were compared preoperatively, postoperatively and between the two groups. RESULTS: 25 patients with AVCF were successfully included and all were followed up for at least 12 months, with no complications during the follow-up period. 10 patients in the BPKP group and 15 patients in the UPKP group, with no statistically significant differences in general information between the two groups. The VAS scores of patients in the BPKP group were lower than those in the UPKP group at 12 months after surgery, and the differences were statistically significant, and there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups at other follow-up time points. In the BPKP group, 80% of patients had symmetrical and more homogeneous bone cement dispersion. 50% of patients in the UPKP group had a lateral distribution of bone cement and uneven bone cement distribution, and the difference in bone cement distribution between the two groups was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: For the treatment of AVCF, the clinical efficacy of both surgical approaches is basically the same. The distribution of cement is more symmetrical and uniformly diffused in the BPKP group, and the clinical efficacy VAS score is lower in the long-term follow-up. Bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty is recommended for the treatment of AVCF. THE ETHICAL REVIEW BATCH NUMBER: XZXY-LJ-20161208-047.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10510266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105102662023-09-21 Bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty versus unipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of asymmetric osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a case control study Liu, Lei Song, Feifei Shang, Jie Zhang, Jianwei Ma, Chao Liu, Guangpu Han, Meng BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: Bipedicular/unipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty are common treatments for OVCF, and there are no studies to show which is more beneficial for AVCF. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of BPKP or UPKP in the treatment of AVCF. METHODS: The clinical data of AVCF patients treated by PKP were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach. General demographic data, perioperative complications, and general information related to surgery were recorded for both groups. The preoperative and postoperative vertebral height difference, vertebral local Cobb angle, lumbar pain VAS score and lumbar JOA score were counted for both groups. The above data were compared preoperatively, postoperatively and between the two groups. RESULTS: 25 patients with AVCF were successfully included and all were followed up for at least 12 months, with no complications during the follow-up period. 10 patients in the BPKP group and 15 patients in the UPKP group, with no statistically significant differences in general information between the two groups. The VAS scores of patients in the BPKP group were lower than those in the UPKP group at 12 months after surgery, and the differences were statistically significant, and there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups at other follow-up time points. In the BPKP group, 80% of patients had symmetrical and more homogeneous bone cement dispersion. 50% of patients in the UPKP group had a lateral distribution of bone cement and uneven bone cement distribution, and the difference in bone cement distribution between the two groups was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: For the treatment of AVCF, the clinical efficacy of both surgical approaches is basically the same. The distribution of cement is more symmetrical and uniformly diffused in the BPKP group, and the clinical efficacy VAS score is lower in the long-term follow-up. Bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty is recommended for the treatment of AVCF. THE ETHICAL REVIEW BATCH NUMBER: XZXY-LJ-20161208-047. BioMed Central 2023-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10510266/ /pubmed/37726728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02180-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Lei
Song, Feifei
Shang, Jie
Zhang, Jianwei
Ma, Chao
Liu, Guangpu
Han, Meng
Bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty versus unipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of asymmetric osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a case control study
title Bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty versus unipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of asymmetric osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a case control study
title_full Bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty versus unipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of asymmetric osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a case control study
title_fullStr Bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty versus unipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of asymmetric osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a case control study
title_full_unstemmed Bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty versus unipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of asymmetric osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a case control study
title_short Bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty versus unipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of asymmetric osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a case control study
title_sort bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty versus unipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of asymmetric osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a case control study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37726728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02180-7
work_keys_str_mv AT liulei bipedicularpercutaneouskyphoplastyversusunipedicularpercutaneouskyphoplastyinthetreatmentofasymmetricosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesacasecontrolstudy
AT songfeifei bipedicularpercutaneouskyphoplastyversusunipedicularpercutaneouskyphoplastyinthetreatmentofasymmetricosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesacasecontrolstudy
AT shangjie bipedicularpercutaneouskyphoplastyversusunipedicularpercutaneouskyphoplastyinthetreatmentofasymmetricosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesacasecontrolstudy
AT zhangjianwei bipedicularpercutaneouskyphoplastyversusunipedicularpercutaneouskyphoplastyinthetreatmentofasymmetricosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesacasecontrolstudy
AT machao bipedicularpercutaneouskyphoplastyversusunipedicularpercutaneouskyphoplastyinthetreatmentofasymmetricosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesacasecontrolstudy
AT liuguangpu bipedicularpercutaneouskyphoplastyversusunipedicularpercutaneouskyphoplastyinthetreatmentofasymmetricosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesacasecontrolstudy
AT hanmeng bipedicularpercutaneouskyphoplastyversusunipedicularpercutaneouskyphoplastyinthetreatmentofasymmetricosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesacasecontrolstudy