Cargando…

Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation

BACKGROUND: Internal fixation of the femoral neck carries a risk of perforation due to the presence of the isthmus of the femoral neck. At present, there are few studies on the safe and risk zones of the femoral neck system (FNS) implantation. This study aimed to recommend the safe range of injectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Mingxuan, Li, Cong, Han, Ning, Sun, Guixin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37726774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04205-6
_version_ 1785107933546151936
author Han, Mingxuan
Li, Cong
Han, Ning
Sun, Guixin
author_facet Han, Mingxuan
Li, Cong
Han, Ning
Sun, Guixin
author_sort Han, Mingxuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Internal fixation of the femoral neck carries a risk of perforation due to the presence of the isthmus of the femoral neck. At present, there are few studies on the safe and risk zones of the femoral neck system (FNS) implantation. This study aimed to recommend the safe range of injection of FNS in the lateral wall of the proximal femur, parallel to the axis of the femoral neck, during FNS treatment of femoral neck fracture (FNF). METHODS: Femoral computed tomography (CT) data of 80 patients (male: 40; female: 40) who met the inclusion criteria were collected. Mimics 21.0 software was used to complete the modeling. 3-Matic 13.0 software was used to establish the axis of the femoral neck and its vertical plane, perform the cutting of the femoral neck, and project it on the vertical plane of the femoral neck axis. After matching a rectangle for each projection map, all sample sizes (80 cases) were standardized and superimposed to obtain gradient maps of the safe zone (SZ) and dangerous zone (RZ), thereby securing edge key points and safe FNS insertion range. RESULTS: In the 80 samples, the mean diameter of the smallest femoral neck section was 33.87 ± 2.32 mm for men and 29.36 ± 1.92 mm for women. All 80 femoral necks had safe and risky areas. The SZ/S × 100% was 77.59 (± 2.22%), and the RS/S × 100% was 22.39% (± 2.22%). The risk area was composed of four parts: (1), (2), (3), and (4), respectively, corresponding to 3.45 ± 1.74%, 5.51 ± 2.63%, 6.22 ± 1.41%, and 7.22 ± 1.39%. Four marginal key points, perforation risk, and safe ranges (SR) of FNS were analyzed on the lateral wall of the femoral neck. CONCLUSIONS: The SR of FNS placement was recommended by digital simulation. In addition, Regions (3) and (4) posed a higher risk of penetrating the cortex. Using the gradient map of RZ for preoperative evaluation is recommended to avoid iatrogenic perforation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10510275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105102752023-09-21 Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation Han, Mingxuan Li, Cong Han, Ning Sun, Guixin J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Internal fixation of the femoral neck carries a risk of perforation due to the presence of the isthmus of the femoral neck. At present, there are few studies on the safe and risk zones of the femoral neck system (FNS) implantation. This study aimed to recommend the safe range of injection of FNS in the lateral wall of the proximal femur, parallel to the axis of the femoral neck, during FNS treatment of femoral neck fracture (FNF). METHODS: Femoral computed tomography (CT) data of 80 patients (male: 40; female: 40) who met the inclusion criteria were collected. Mimics 21.0 software was used to complete the modeling. 3-Matic 13.0 software was used to establish the axis of the femoral neck and its vertical plane, perform the cutting of the femoral neck, and project it on the vertical plane of the femoral neck axis. After matching a rectangle for each projection map, all sample sizes (80 cases) were standardized and superimposed to obtain gradient maps of the safe zone (SZ) and dangerous zone (RZ), thereby securing edge key points and safe FNS insertion range. RESULTS: In the 80 samples, the mean diameter of the smallest femoral neck section was 33.87 ± 2.32 mm for men and 29.36 ± 1.92 mm for women. All 80 femoral necks had safe and risky areas. The SZ/S × 100% was 77.59 (± 2.22%), and the RS/S × 100% was 22.39% (± 2.22%). The risk area was composed of four parts: (1), (2), (3), and (4), respectively, corresponding to 3.45 ± 1.74%, 5.51 ± 2.63%, 6.22 ± 1.41%, and 7.22 ± 1.39%. Four marginal key points, perforation risk, and safe ranges (SR) of FNS were analyzed on the lateral wall of the femoral neck. CONCLUSIONS: The SR of FNS placement was recommended by digital simulation. In addition, Regions (3) and (4) posed a higher risk of penetrating the cortex. Using the gradient map of RZ for preoperative evaluation is recommended to avoid iatrogenic perforation. BioMed Central 2023-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10510275/ /pubmed/37726774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04205-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Han, Mingxuan
Li, Cong
Han, Ning
Sun, Guixin
Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation
title Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation
title_full Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation
title_fullStr Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation
title_full_unstemmed Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation
title_short Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation
title_sort safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37726774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04205-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hanmingxuan saferangeoffemoralnecksysteminsertionandtheriskofperforation
AT licong saferangeoffemoralnecksysteminsertionandtheriskofperforation
AT hanning saferangeoffemoralnecksysteminsertionandtheriskofperforation
AT sunguixin saferangeoffemoralnecksysteminsertionandtheriskofperforation