Cargando…
Treatment strategy for BVO-ME based on long-term outcomes correlating retinal structure by OCT image and visual acuity
BACKGROUND: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a mainstream treatment for reducing ME secondary to BRVO (BVO-ME). Regrettably, most reports of intravitreal anti-VEGF for BVO-ME have disclosed only short-term outcomes. Here, we characterized long-term indicators for the vi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37726720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03138-2 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a mainstream treatment for reducing ME secondary to BRVO (BVO-ME). Regrettably, most reports of intravitreal anti-VEGF for BVO-ME have disclosed only short-term outcomes. Here, we characterized long-term indicators for the visual prognosis of patients with BVO-ME, including the correlation between retinal structure by OCT and visual acuity. METHODS: Patients with BVO-ME were retrospectively recruited based on clinical records in Kansai Medical University Hospital from June 2012 to March 2022. This study enrolled patients with vision loss who received intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF for BVO-ME. Inclusion criteria were that patients received intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF as their first treatment and were followed for at least 36 months. Exclusion criteria were those patients with ocular disease other than BRVO or who had been previously treated for BVO-ME. Patients were divided into two groups according to BCVA at the final visit: Group A (≥ 0.7) and Group B (< 0.7). RESULTS: Forty-seven eyes from 45 patients were assessed. The mean follow-up period from initial to final visit was 64.38 ± 15.07 (range, 38–100) months. BCVA in Group A (n = 32) was significantly greater than in Group B (n = 15) at all timepoints. The ratio that the number of eyes which the EZ band and the foveal bulge were intact in Group A was higher than in Group B (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.0002, respectively). The ratio that the number of eyes which recurrence SRD was observed by the final visit in Group A was lower than in Group B (p = 0.0485). CONCLUSIONS: The integrity of the EZ band and an intact foveal bulge were significant predictors for visual acuity. In contrast, recurrent SRD led to poor visual acuity in the long term, even if BCVA was good in the short term. |
---|