Cargando…

Qualitative study of Oncology Clinicians’ Perceptions of Barriers to Offering Clinical Trials to Underserved Populations

INTRODUCTION: Cancer clinical trials represent the “gold standard” for advancing novel cancer therapies. Optimizing trial participation is critical to ensuring the generalizability of findings across patients, yet trial enrollment rates, particularly among minority and socioeconomically disadvantage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perez, Giselle K., Oberoi, Anjali R., Finkelstein-Fox, Lucy, Park, Elyse R., Nipp, Ryan D., Moy, Beverly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37724824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748231187829
_version_ 1785107952632332288
author Perez, Giselle K.
Oberoi, Anjali R.
Finkelstein-Fox, Lucy
Park, Elyse R.
Nipp, Ryan D.
Moy, Beverly
author_facet Perez, Giselle K.
Oberoi, Anjali R.
Finkelstein-Fox, Lucy
Park, Elyse R.
Nipp, Ryan D.
Moy, Beverly
author_sort Perez, Giselle K.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cancer clinical trials represent the “gold standard” for advancing novel cancer therapies. Optimizing trial participation is critical to ensuring the generalizability of findings across patients, yet trial enrollment rates, particularly among minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations, remain suboptimal. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with oncologists at a large academic medical center to explore their (1) attitudes and perceived barriers to offering clinical trials to minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients, and (2) recommendations for improving the enrollment of minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients in cancer clinical trials. RESULTS: Of 23 medical oncologists approached, 17 enrolled (74% response rate; mean age = 47; female = 42%; White = 67%). Content analysis revealed several barriers to enrollment: (1) ethical dilemmas; (2) ambivalence about trial risks and benefits; and (3) concern about patient well-being. Concerns about the legitimacy of informed consent, perceived lack of equipoise, and fear of personal bias influenced clinicians’ decisions to recommend trials during treatment discussions. Concerns about creating an imbalance between trial risks and benefits among patients with high-level needs, including patients with literacy, psychiatric, and other socioeconomic vulnerabilities, impacted clinicians’ enthusiasm to engage in trial discussions. Clinicians identified patient, provider, and system-level solutions to address challenges, including increasing patient and clinician support as well as involving external personnel to support trial enrollment. CONCLUSION: Findings reveal multi-level barriers to offering cancer clinical trials to underrepresented patients. Targeted solutions, including system level changes to support clinicians, patient financial support, and implementation of clinical trial navigation programs were recommended to help reduce access barriers and increase enrollment of underrepresented patients into cancer clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10510359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105103592023-09-21 Qualitative study of Oncology Clinicians’ Perceptions of Barriers to Offering Clinical Trials to Underserved Populations Perez, Giselle K. Oberoi, Anjali R. Finkelstein-Fox, Lucy Park, Elyse R. Nipp, Ryan D. Moy, Beverly Cancer Control Disparities in Cancer Treatment and Outcome INTRODUCTION: Cancer clinical trials represent the “gold standard” for advancing novel cancer therapies. Optimizing trial participation is critical to ensuring the generalizability of findings across patients, yet trial enrollment rates, particularly among minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations, remain suboptimal. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with oncologists at a large academic medical center to explore their (1) attitudes and perceived barriers to offering clinical trials to minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients, and (2) recommendations for improving the enrollment of minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients in cancer clinical trials. RESULTS: Of 23 medical oncologists approached, 17 enrolled (74% response rate; mean age = 47; female = 42%; White = 67%). Content analysis revealed several barriers to enrollment: (1) ethical dilemmas; (2) ambivalence about trial risks and benefits; and (3) concern about patient well-being. Concerns about the legitimacy of informed consent, perceived lack of equipoise, and fear of personal bias influenced clinicians’ decisions to recommend trials during treatment discussions. Concerns about creating an imbalance between trial risks and benefits among patients with high-level needs, including patients with literacy, psychiatric, and other socioeconomic vulnerabilities, impacted clinicians’ enthusiasm to engage in trial discussions. Clinicians identified patient, provider, and system-level solutions to address challenges, including increasing patient and clinician support as well as involving external personnel to support trial enrollment. CONCLUSION: Findings reveal multi-level barriers to offering cancer clinical trials to underrepresented patients. Targeted solutions, including system level changes to support clinicians, patient financial support, and implementation of clinical trial navigation programs were recommended to help reduce access barriers and increase enrollment of underrepresented patients into cancer clinical trials. SAGE Publications 2023-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10510359/ /pubmed/37724824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748231187829 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Disparities in Cancer Treatment and Outcome
Perez, Giselle K.
Oberoi, Anjali R.
Finkelstein-Fox, Lucy
Park, Elyse R.
Nipp, Ryan D.
Moy, Beverly
Qualitative study of Oncology Clinicians’ Perceptions of Barriers to Offering Clinical Trials to Underserved Populations
title Qualitative study of Oncology Clinicians’ Perceptions of Barriers to Offering Clinical Trials to Underserved Populations
title_full Qualitative study of Oncology Clinicians’ Perceptions of Barriers to Offering Clinical Trials to Underserved Populations
title_fullStr Qualitative study of Oncology Clinicians’ Perceptions of Barriers to Offering Clinical Trials to Underserved Populations
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative study of Oncology Clinicians’ Perceptions of Barriers to Offering Clinical Trials to Underserved Populations
title_short Qualitative study of Oncology Clinicians’ Perceptions of Barriers to Offering Clinical Trials to Underserved Populations
title_sort qualitative study of oncology clinicians’ perceptions of barriers to offering clinical trials to underserved populations
topic Disparities in Cancer Treatment and Outcome
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37724824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748231187829
work_keys_str_mv AT perezgisellek qualitativestudyofoncologycliniciansperceptionsofbarrierstoofferingclinicaltrialstounderservedpopulations
AT oberoianjalir qualitativestudyofoncologycliniciansperceptionsofbarrierstoofferingclinicaltrialstounderservedpopulations
AT finkelsteinfoxlucy qualitativestudyofoncologycliniciansperceptionsofbarrierstoofferingclinicaltrialstounderservedpopulations
AT parkelyser qualitativestudyofoncologycliniciansperceptionsofbarrierstoofferingclinicaltrialstounderservedpopulations
AT nippryand qualitativestudyofoncologycliniciansperceptionsofbarrierstoofferingclinicaltrialstounderservedpopulations
AT moybeverly qualitativestudyofoncologycliniciansperceptionsofbarrierstoofferingclinicaltrialstounderservedpopulations