Cargando…

PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the method of choice to provide long-term enteral nutrition for patients with impossibility to be fed orally. Although it is considered a routine and safe procedure, potential complications exist, which are generally classified into three major categories...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fornaroli, Fabiola, Gualandi, Noemi, Vincenzi, Francesca, Laghi, Luigi, de’Angelis, Gian Luigi, Gaiani, Federica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510995/
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93iS1.12515
_version_ 1785108059925774336
author Fornaroli, Fabiola
Gualandi, Noemi
Vincenzi, Francesca
Laghi, Luigi
de’Angelis, Gian Luigi
Gaiani, Federica
author_facet Fornaroli, Fabiola
Gualandi, Noemi
Vincenzi, Francesca
Laghi, Luigi
de’Angelis, Gian Luigi
Gaiani, Federica
author_sort Fornaroli, Fabiola
collection PubMed
description Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the method of choice to provide long-term enteral nutrition for patients with impossibility to be fed orally. Although it is considered a routine and safe procedure, potential complications exist, which are generally classified into three major categories: endoscopic technical difficulties, PEG procedure-related complications and late complications associated with PEG tube use, such as buried bumper syndrome (BBS). BBS is a potentially life-threatening complication, occurring in 0.3% to 2.5% of cases. Additional complications related to BBS may present, such as wound infection, peritonitis, and necrotizing fasciitis. Once resolved the acute complication, an adequate feeding method should be prompted for the patient, among whom PEG remains of choice. After tissue inflammation, fibrosis may prevent a standard endoscopic procedure for the new implantation, therefore endoscopists should modulate procedures to obtain successful and safe results. A combined surgical- and endoscopic strategy could resolve implantation difficulties ensuring a safe and simple procedure. We present here a case of BBS complicated with abdominal wall cellulitis in a paraplegic 35-year-old-man who was admitted to our hospital. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10510995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105109952023-09-21 PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report Fornaroli, Fabiola Gualandi, Noemi Vincenzi, Francesca Laghi, Luigi de’Angelis, Gian Luigi Gaiani, Federica Acta Biomed Case Report Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the method of choice to provide long-term enteral nutrition for patients with impossibility to be fed orally. Although it is considered a routine and safe procedure, potential complications exist, which are generally classified into three major categories: endoscopic technical difficulties, PEG procedure-related complications and late complications associated with PEG tube use, such as buried bumper syndrome (BBS). BBS is a potentially life-threatening complication, occurring in 0.3% to 2.5% of cases. Additional complications related to BBS may present, such as wound infection, peritonitis, and necrotizing fasciitis. Once resolved the acute complication, an adequate feeding method should be prompted for the patient, among whom PEG remains of choice. After tissue inflammation, fibrosis may prevent a standard endoscopic procedure for the new implantation, therefore endoscopists should modulate procedures to obtain successful and safe results. A combined surgical- and endoscopic strategy could resolve implantation difficulties ensuring a safe and simple procedure. We present here a case of BBS complicated with abdominal wall cellulitis in a paraplegic 35-year-old-man who was admitted to our hospital. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2022 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10510995/ http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93iS1.12515 Text en Copyright: © 2022 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Case Report
Fornaroli, Fabiola
Gualandi, Noemi
Vincenzi, Francesca
Laghi, Luigi
de’Angelis, Gian Luigi
Gaiani, Federica
PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report
title PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report
title_full PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report
title_fullStr PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report
title_full_unstemmed PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report
title_short PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report
title_sort peg reimplantation after buried bumper syndrome: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510995/
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93iS1.12515
work_keys_str_mv AT fornarolifabiola pegreimplantationafterburiedbumpersyndromeacasereport
AT gualandinoemi pegreimplantationafterburiedbumpersyndromeacasereport
AT vincenzifrancesca pegreimplantationafterburiedbumpersyndromeacasereport
AT laghiluigi pegreimplantationafterburiedbumpersyndromeacasereport
AT deangelisgianluigi pegreimplantationafterburiedbumpersyndromeacasereport
AT gaianifederica pegreimplantationafterburiedbumpersyndromeacasereport