Cargando…
PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the method of choice to provide long-term enteral nutrition for patients with impossibility to be fed orally. Although it is considered a routine and safe procedure, potential complications exist, which are generally classified into three major categories...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mattioli 1885
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510995/ http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93iS1.12515 |
_version_ | 1785108059925774336 |
---|---|
author | Fornaroli, Fabiola Gualandi, Noemi Vincenzi, Francesca Laghi, Luigi de’Angelis, Gian Luigi Gaiani, Federica |
author_facet | Fornaroli, Fabiola Gualandi, Noemi Vincenzi, Francesca Laghi, Luigi de’Angelis, Gian Luigi Gaiani, Federica |
author_sort | Fornaroli, Fabiola |
collection | PubMed |
description | Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the method of choice to provide long-term enteral nutrition for patients with impossibility to be fed orally. Although it is considered a routine and safe procedure, potential complications exist, which are generally classified into three major categories: endoscopic technical difficulties, PEG procedure-related complications and late complications associated with PEG tube use, such as buried bumper syndrome (BBS). BBS is a potentially life-threatening complication, occurring in 0.3% to 2.5% of cases. Additional complications related to BBS may present, such as wound infection, peritonitis, and necrotizing fasciitis. Once resolved the acute complication, an adequate feeding method should be prompted for the patient, among whom PEG remains of choice. After tissue inflammation, fibrosis may prevent a standard endoscopic procedure for the new implantation, therefore endoscopists should modulate procedures to obtain successful and safe results. A combined surgical- and endoscopic strategy could resolve implantation difficulties ensuring a safe and simple procedure. We present here a case of BBS complicated with abdominal wall cellulitis in a paraplegic 35-year-old-man who was admitted to our hospital. (www.actabiomedica.it) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10510995 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Mattioli 1885 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105109952023-09-21 PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report Fornaroli, Fabiola Gualandi, Noemi Vincenzi, Francesca Laghi, Luigi de’Angelis, Gian Luigi Gaiani, Federica Acta Biomed Case Report Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the method of choice to provide long-term enteral nutrition for patients with impossibility to be fed orally. Although it is considered a routine and safe procedure, potential complications exist, which are generally classified into three major categories: endoscopic technical difficulties, PEG procedure-related complications and late complications associated with PEG tube use, such as buried bumper syndrome (BBS). BBS is a potentially life-threatening complication, occurring in 0.3% to 2.5% of cases. Additional complications related to BBS may present, such as wound infection, peritonitis, and necrotizing fasciitis. Once resolved the acute complication, an adequate feeding method should be prompted for the patient, among whom PEG remains of choice. After tissue inflammation, fibrosis may prevent a standard endoscopic procedure for the new implantation, therefore endoscopists should modulate procedures to obtain successful and safe results. A combined surgical- and endoscopic strategy could resolve implantation difficulties ensuring a safe and simple procedure. We present here a case of BBS complicated with abdominal wall cellulitis in a paraplegic 35-year-old-man who was admitted to our hospital. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2022 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10510995/ http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93iS1.12515 Text en Copyright: © 2022 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Case Report Fornaroli, Fabiola Gualandi, Noemi Vincenzi, Francesca Laghi, Luigi de’Angelis, Gian Luigi Gaiani, Federica PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report |
title | PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report |
title_full | PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report |
title_fullStr | PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report |
title_full_unstemmed | PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report |
title_short | PEG reimplantation after Buried Bumper Syndrome: a case report |
title_sort | peg reimplantation after buried bumper syndrome: a case report |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510995/ http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93iS1.12515 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fornarolifabiola pegreimplantationafterburiedbumpersyndromeacasereport AT gualandinoemi pegreimplantationafterburiedbumpersyndromeacasereport AT vincenzifrancesca pegreimplantationafterburiedbumpersyndromeacasereport AT laghiluigi pegreimplantationafterburiedbumpersyndromeacasereport AT deangelisgianluigi pegreimplantationafterburiedbumpersyndromeacasereport AT gaianifederica pegreimplantationafterburiedbumpersyndromeacasereport |