Cargando…
Developing a consensus of recovery from suicidal ideations and behaviours: A Delphi study with experts by experience
BACKGROUND: Understanding recovery in mental health has received significant attention and consequently, recovery has been incorporated into health policy across many countries in the Global North. In comparison, the concept of ‘recovery’ from suicidal thoughts and behaviours has received little att...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37729121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291377 |
_version_ | 1785108070530023424 |
---|---|
author | Ropaj, Esmira Haddock, Gillian Pratt, Daniel |
author_facet | Ropaj, Esmira Haddock, Gillian Pratt, Daniel |
author_sort | Ropaj, Esmira |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Understanding recovery in mental health has received significant attention and consequently, recovery has been incorporated into health policy across many countries in the Global North. In comparison, the concept of ‘recovery’ from suicidal thoughts and behaviours has received little attention. However, the few studies in this area appear to suggest that recovery is a complex and an idiosyncratic process with many contributing factors. This can present a challenge for clinicians and services seeking to become more recovery focused. Thus, it seems of importance to develop a consensus on how recovery from suicidal thoughts and behaviours is conceptualised. AIM: The study aimed to use the Delphi design to establish a consensus of how recovery is defined by those with lived experience of suicidal thoughts and behaviours. The Delphi method draws on the expertise of a panel, often involving clinicians, researchers and lived experience experts to develop consensus over a topic by inviting them to rate the importance of, often a series of statements to a given topic area. METHOD: Lived experience experts were asked to complete two rounds of questionnaires distributed online to capture their views on recovery. RESULTS: A total of 196 individuals gave their views on the first round of the study and 97 gave their views on the second round. A final list of 110 statements was developed that 80% or more of participants defined as essential or important. Statements covered items that were important in defining, facilitation and hindering the process of recovery. CONCLUSION: Findings are consistent with the wider literature that suggests that recovery is an idiosyncratic process, but with many commonly shared features. Here we also show that a comprehensive definition of recovery must include factors that hinder the process of recovery. Implications and recommendations for practice, policy development and future research are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10511083 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105110832023-09-21 Developing a consensus of recovery from suicidal ideations and behaviours: A Delphi study with experts by experience Ropaj, Esmira Haddock, Gillian Pratt, Daniel PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Understanding recovery in mental health has received significant attention and consequently, recovery has been incorporated into health policy across many countries in the Global North. In comparison, the concept of ‘recovery’ from suicidal thoughts and behaviours has received little attention. However, the few studies in this area appear to suggest that recovery is a complex and an idiosyncratic process with many contributing factors. This can present a challenge for clinicians and services seeking to become more recovery focused. Thus, it seems of importance to develop a consensus on how recovery from suicidal thoughts and behaviours is conceptualised. AIM: The study aimed to use the Delphi design to establish a consensus of how recovery is defined by those with lived experience of suicidal thoughts and behaviours. The Delphi method draws on the expertise of a panel, often involving clinicians, researchers and lived experience experts to develop consensus over a topic by inviting them to rate the importance of, often a series of statements to a given topic area. METHOD: Lived experience experts were asked to complete two rounds of questionnaires distributed online to capture their views on recovery. RESULTS: A total of 196 individuals gave their views on the first round of the study and 97 gave their views on the second round. A final list of 110 statements was developed that 80% or more of participants defined as essential or important. Statements covered items that were important in defining, facilitation and hindering the process of recovery. CONCLUSION: Findings are consistent with the wider literature that suggests that recovery is an idiosyncratic process, but with many commonly shared features. Here we also show that a comprehensive definition of recovery must include factors that hinder the process of recovery. Implications and recommendations for practice, policy development and future research are discussed. Public Library of Science 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10511083/ /pubmed/37729121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291377 Text en © 2023 Ropaj et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ropaj, Esmira Haddock, Gillian Pratt, Daniel Developing a consensus of recovery from suicidal ideations and behaviours: A Delphi study with experts by experience |
title | Developing a consensus of recovery from suicidal ideations and behaviours: A Delphi study with experts by experience |
title_full | Developing a consensus of recovery from suicidal ideations and behaviours: A Delphi study with experts by experience |
title_fullStr | Developing a consensus of recovery from suicidal ideations and behaviours: A Delphi study with experts by experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing a consensus of recovery from suicidal ideations and behaviours: A Delphi study with experts by experience |
title_short | Developing a consensus of recovery from suicidal ideations and behaviours: A Delphi study with experts by experience |
title_sort | developing a consensus of recovery from suicidal ideations and behaviours: a delphi study with experts by experience |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37729121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291377 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ropajesmira developingaconsensusofrecoveryfromsuicidalideationsandbehavioursadelphistudywithexpertsbyexperience AT haddockgillian developingaconsensusofrecoveryfromsuicidalideationsandbehavioursadelphistudywithexpertsbyexperience AT prattdaniel developingaconsensusofrecoveryfromsuicidalideationsandbehavioursadelphistudywithexpertsbyexperience |