Cargando…

Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience

Objective: Endoscopic resections are increasingly being used for superficial gastrointestinal lesions. However, application of these techniques in the duodenum remains challenging, due to the technical difficulties and high complication rates. This study projects a western tertiary center’s experien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taşkın, Orhun Çığ, Aslan, Fatih, Aydın Meriçöz, Çisel, Adsay, Volkan, Kapran, Yersu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Federation of Turkish Pathology Societies 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31825518
http://dx.doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2019.01474
_version_ 1785108097824456704
author Taşkın, Orhun Çığ
Aslan, Fatih
Aydın Meriçöz, Çisel
Adsay, Volkan
Kapran, Yersu
author_facet Taşkın, Orhun Çığ
Aslan, Fatih
Aydın Meriçöz, Çisel
Adsay, Volkan
Kapran, Yersu
author_sort Taşkın, Orhun Çığ
collection PubMed
description Objective: Endoscopic resections are increasingly being used for superficial gastrointestinal lesions. However, application of these techniques in the duodenum remains challenging, due to the technical difficulties and high complication rates. This study projects a western tertiary center’s experience in the endoscopic treatment and diagnostic workup of 19 cases of non-ampullary duodenal lesions. Material and Method: Specimens (12 endoscopic mucosal resections, 6 endoscopic submucosal dissections, and one endoscopic full-thickness resection) were processed following a strict protocol (photographed, mapped digitally and submitted totally) for histopathologic examination. Clinicopathologic characteristics, margin status and follow-up information were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the 16 patients was 52 years (range: 22-81). Mean lesion size was 1.4 cm (range: 0.3-3.6 cm) for all cases, 2 cm for endoscopic submucosal dissections and 1.1 cm for endoscopic mucosal resections. Mean number of blocks submitted was 4/case. Seven neuroendocrine tumors, 3 tubulovillous adenomas were diagnosed along with nine benign lesions. For endoscopic submucosal dissections, en-bloc and R0 resection rates were 100% (n=6/6) and 83% (n=5/6); for endoscopic mucosal resections, they were 92% (n=11/12) and 83% (n=10/12), respectively. Only one patient had procedure-related late perforation that was managed endoscopically. No mortality was encountered. Conclusion: Duodenal endoscopic resections proved successful, safe and feasible methods in a tertiary center. The pathologist’s role is to designate the accurate diagnosis, related histopathologic parameters and margin status. The gross protocol was found to be essential in evaluating specimen margins and orientation, as well as in size measurement. We recommend following a standardized approach including gross photography and digital mapping when handling these specimens, for both diagnostic and data collection purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10511249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Federation of Turkish Pathology Societies
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105112492023-09-21 Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience Taşkın, Orhun Çığ Aslan, Fatih Aydın Meriçöz, Çisel Adsay, Volkan Kapran, Yersu Turk Patoloji Derg Original Article Objective: Endoscopic resections are increasingly being used for superficial gastrointestinal lesions. However, application of these techniques in the duodenum remains challenging, due to the technical difficulties and high complication rates. This study projects a western tertiary center’s experience in the endoscopic treatment and diagnostic workup of 19 cases of non-ampullary duodenal lesions. Material and Method: Specimens (12 endoscopic mucosal resections, 6 endoscopic submucosal dissections, and one endoscopic full-thickness resection) were processed following a strict protocol (photographed, mapped digitally and submitted totally) for histopathologic examination. Clinicopathologic characteristics, margin status and follow-up information were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the 16 patients was 52 years (range: 22-81). Mean lesion size was 1.4 cm (range: 0.3-3.6 cm) for all cases, 2 cm for endoscopic submucosal dissections and 1.1 cm for endoscopic mucosal resections. Mean number of blocks submitted was 4/case. Seven neuroendocrine tumors, 3 tubulovillous adenomas were diagnosed along with nine benign lesions. For endoscopic submucosal dissections, en-bloc and R0 resection rates were 100% (n=6/6) and 83% (n=5/6); for endoscopic mucosal resections, they were 92% (n=11/12) and 83% (n=10/12), respectively. Only one patient had procedure-related late perforation that was managed endoscopically. No mortality was encountered. Conclusion: Duodenal endoscopic resections proved successful, safe and feasible methods in a tertiary center. The pathologist’s role is to designate the accurate diagnosis, related histopathologic parameters and margin status. The gross protocol was found to be essential in evaluating specimen margins and orientation, as well as in size measurement. We recommend following a standardized approach including gross photography and digital mapping when handling these specimens, for both diagnostic and data collection purposes. Federation of Turkish Pathology Societies 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10511249/ /pubmed/31825518 http://dx.doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2019.01474 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article published by Federation of Turkish Pathology Societies under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Taşkın, Orhun Çığ
Aslan, Fatih
Aydın Meriçöz, Çisel
Adsay, Volkan
Kapran, Yersu
Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience
title Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience
title_full Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience
title_fullStr Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience
title_short Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience
title_sort pathologic evaluation of endoscopically resected non-ampullary duodenal lesions: a single center experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31825518
http://dx.doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2019.01474
work_keys_str_mv AT taskınorhuncıg pathologicevaluationofendoscopicallyresectednonampullaryduodenallesionsasinglecenterexperience
AT aslanfatih pathologicevaluationofendoscopicallyresectednonampullaryduodenallesionsasinglecenterexperience
AT aydınmericozcisel pathologicevaluationofendoscopicallyresectednonampullaryduodenallesionsasinglecenterexperience
AT adsayvolkan pathologicevaluationofendoscopicallyresectednonampullaryduodenallesionsasinglecenterexperience
AT kapranyersu pathologicevaluationofendoscopicallyresectednonampullaryduodenallesionsasinglecenterexperience