Cargando…
Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience
Objective: Endoscopic resections are increasingly being used for superficial gastrointestinal lesions. However, application of these techniques in the duodenum remains challenging, due to the technical difficulties and high complication rates. This study projects a western tertiary center’s experien...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Federation of Turkish Pathology Societies
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31825518 http://dx.doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2019.01474 |
_version_ | 1785108097824456704 |
---|---|
author | Taşkın, Orhun Çığ Aslan, Fatih Aydın Meriçöz, Çisel Adsay, Volkan Kapran, Yersu |
author_facet | Taşkın, Orhun Çığ Aslan, Fatih Aydın Meriçöz, Çisel Adsay, Volkan Kapran, Yersu |
author_sort | Taşkın, Orhun Çığ |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Endoscopic resections are increasingly being used for superficial gastrointestinal lesions. However, application of these techniques in the duodenum remains challenging, due to the technical difficulties and high complication rates. This study projects a western tertiary center’s experience in the endoscopic treatment and diagnostic workup of 19 cases of non-ampullary duodenal lesions. Material and Method: Specimens (12 endoscopic mucosal resections, 6 endoscopic submucosal dissections, and one endoscopic full-thickness resection) were processed following a strict protocol (photographed, mapped digitally and submitted totally) for histopathologic examination. Clinicopathologic characteristics, margin status and follow-up information were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the 16 patients was 52 years (range: 22-81). Mean lesion size was 1.4 cm (range: 0.3-3.6 cm) for all cases, 2 cm for endoscopic submucosal dissections and 1.1 cm for endoscopic mucosal resections. Mean number of blocks submitted was 4/case. Seven neuroendocrine tumors, 3 tubulovillous adenomas were diagnosed along with nine benign lesions. For endoscopic submucosal dissections, en-bloc and R0 resection rates were 100% (n=6/6) and 83% (n=5/6); for endoscopic mucosal resections, they were 92% (n=11/12) and 83% (n=10/12), respectively. Only one patient had procedure-related late perforation that was managed endoscopically. No mortality was encountered. Conclusion: Duodenal endoscopic resections proved successful, safe and feasible methods in a tertiary center. The pathologist’s role is to designate the accurate diagnosis, related histopathologic parameters and margin status. The gross protocol was found to be essential in evaluating specimen margins and orientation, as well as in size measurement. We recommend following a standardized approach including gross photography and digital mapping when handling these specimens, for both diagnostic and data collection purposes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10511249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Federation of Turkish Pathology Societies |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105112492023-09-21 Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience Taşkın, Orhun Çığ Aslan, Fatih Aydın Meriçöz, Çisel Adsay, Volkan Kapran, Yersu Turk Patoloji Derg Original Article Objective: Endoscopic resections are increasingly being used for superficial gastrointestinal lesions. However, application of these techniques in the duodenum remains challenging, due to the technical difficulties and high complication rates. This study projects a western tertiary center’s experience in the endoscopic treatment and diagnostic workup of 19 cases of non-ampullary duodenal lesions. Material and Method: Specimens (12 endoscopic mucosal resections, 6 endoscopic submucosal dissections, and one endoscopic full-thickness resection) were processed following a strict protocol (photographed, mapped digitally and submitted totally) for histopathologic examination. Clinicopathologic characteristics, margin status and follow-up information were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the 16 patients was 52 years (range: 22-81). Mean lesion size was 1.4 cm (range: 0.3-3.6 cm) for all cases, 2 cm for endoscopic submucosal dissections and 1.1 cm for endoscopic mucosal resections. Mean number of blocks submitted was 4/case. Seven neuroendocrine tumors, 3 tubulovillous adenomas were diagnosed along with nine benign lesions. For endoscopic submucosal dissections, en-bloc and R0 resection rates were 100% (n=6/6) and 83% (n=5/6); for endoscopic mucosal resections, they were 92% (n=11/12) and 83% (n=10/12), respectively. Only one patient had procedure-related late perforation that was managed endoscopically. No mortality was encountered. Conclusion: Duodenal endoscopic resections proved successful, safe and feasible methods in a tertiary center. The pathologist’s role is to designate the accurate diagnosis, related histopathologic parameters and margin status. The gross protocol was found to be essential in evaluating specimen margins and orientation, as well as in size measurement. We recommend following a standardized approach including gross photography and digital mapping when handling these specimens, for both diagnostic and data collection purposes. Federation of Turkish Pathology Societies 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10511249/ /pubmed/31825518 http://dx.doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2019.01474 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article published by Federation of Turkish Pathology Societies under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Taşkın, Orhun Çığ Aslan, Fatih Aydın Meriçöz, Çisel Adsay, Volkan Kapran, Yersu Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience |
title | Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience |
title_full | Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience |
title_fullStr | Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience |
title_short | Pathologic Evaluation of Endoscopically Resected Non-Ampullary Duodenal Lesions: A Single Center Experience |
title_sort | pathologic evaluation of endoscopically resected non-ampullary duodenal lesions: a single center experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31825518 http://dx.doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2019.01474 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taskınorhuncıg pathologicevaluationofendoscopicallyresectednonampullaryduodenallesionsasinglecenterexperience AT aslanfatih pathologicevaluationofendoscopicallyresectednonampullaryduodenallesionsasinglecenterexperience AT aydınmericozcisel pathologicevaluationofendoscopicallyresectednonampullaryduodenallesionsasinglecenterexperience AT adsayvolkan pathologicevaluationofendoscopicallyresectednonampullaryduodenallesionsasinglecenterexperience AT kapranyersu pathologicevaluationofendoscopicallyresectednonampullaryduodenallesionsasinglecenterexperience |