Cargando…

Imaging Findings, Fluoroscopic Time, and Results of the Lumbosacral Selective Nerve Root Block: Focus on the L5 Nerve Root Block

Introduction Selective nerve root block (SNRB) is a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic tool. In some cases, intra-nerve root puncture is difficult and time-consuming, and radiation exposure time for the surgeon may be prolonged. The aim of this study is to examine the contrast findings, fluoroscopi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serikyaku, Hisashi, Higa, Shoichiro, Yara, Tetsuya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37736456
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43872
_version_ 1785108107324555264
author Serikyaku, Hisashi
Higa, Shoichiro
Yara, Tetsuya
author_facet Serikyaku, Hisashi
Higa, Shoichiro
Yara, Tetsuya
author_sort Serikyaku, Hisashi
collection PubMed
description Introduction Selective nerve root block (SNRB) is a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic tool. In some cases, intra-nerve root puncture is difficult and time-consuming, and radiation exposure time for the surgeon may be prolonged. The aim of this study is to examine the contrast findings, fluoroscopic time, and outcomes of SNRB. Methods A total of 139 cases of SNRB were included in the study. We investigated radiating pain presence, duration of fluoroscopic time, contrast types for nerve roots, and SNRB outcomes. Contrast patterns of nerve roots were categorized into three types, which were: type 1: the presence of contrast along the nerve roots; type 2: the presence of contrast within the intravertebral foramen but not in the nerve root; and type 3: the absence of both nerve root and intravertebral foramen contrast. Results The mean fluoroscopic time was 12.8 ± 15.3 seconds for type 1, 11.1 ± 8.9 seconds for type 2, and 23.6 ± 18.8 seconds for type 3. Statistically significant differences were found between the three groups (p = 0.007), and subsequent multiple comparisons showed significant differences between type 1 and type 2 (p = 0.010) and between type 2 and type 3 (p = 0.015). The visual analog scale (VAS) score before and 30 minutes after SNRB demonstrated a significant improvement in all patients. The mean change in VAS before and after nerve root block was 49.6 ± 21.7 mm for type 1 cases, 49.8 ± 25.2 mm for type 2 cases, and 37.8 ± 23.6 mm for type 3 cases, with no statistically significant difference between the three groups (p = 0.090). The proportion of patients with subjective symptomatic improvement before and after SNRB was 91.3% in type 1 cases, 88.5% in type 2 cases, and 85.7% in type 3 cases, with no statistically significant difference between the three groups (p = 0.641). Conclusions The above findings indicate that type 3 is beneficial for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10511297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105112972023-09-21 Imaging Findings, Fluoroscopic Time, and Results of the Lumbosacral Selective Nerve Root Block: Focus on the L5 Nerve Root Block Serikyaku, Hisashi Higa, Shoichiro Yara, Tetsuya Cureus Pain Management Introduction Selective nerve root block (SNRB) is a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic tool. In some cases, intra-nerve root puncture is difficult and time-consuming, and radiation exposure time for the surgeon may be prolonged. The aim of this study is to examine the contrast findings, fluoroscopic time, and outcomes of SNRB. Methods A total of 139 cases of SNRB were included in the study. We investigated radiating pain presence, duration of fluoroscopic time, contrast types for nerve roots, and SNRB outcomes. Contrast patterns of nerve roots were categorized into three types, which were: type 1: the presence of contrast along the nerve roots; type 2: the presence of contrast within the intravertebral foramen but not in the nerve root; and type 3: the absence of both nerve root and intravertebral foramen contrast. Results The mean fluoroscopic time was 12.8 ± 15.3 seconds for type 1, 11.1 ± 8.9 seconds for type 2, and 23.6 ± 18.8 seconds for type 3. Statistically significant differences were found between the three groups (p = 0.007), and subsequent multiple comparisons showed significant differences between type 1 and type 2 (p = 0.010) and between type 2 and type 3 (p = 0.015). The visual analog scale (VAS) score before and 30 minutes after SNRB demonstrated a significant improvement in all patients. The mean change in VAS before and after nerve root block was 49.6 ± 21.7 mm for type 1 cases, 49.8 ± 25.2 mm for type 2 cases, and 37.8 ± 23.6 mm for type 3 cases, with no statistically significant difference between the three groups (p = 0.090). The proportion of patients with subjective symptomatic improvement before and after SNRB was 91.3% in type 1 cases, 88.5% in type 2 cases, and 85.7% in type 3 cases, with no statistically significant difference between the three groups (p = 0.641). Conclusions The above findings indicate that type 3 is beneficial for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Cureus 2023-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10511297/ /pubmed/37736456 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43872 Text en Copyright © 2023, Serikyaku et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Pain Management
Serikyaku, Hisashi
Higa, Shoichiro
Yara, Tetsuya
Imaging Findings, Fluoroscopic Time, and Results of the Lumbosacral Selective Nerve Root Block: Focus on the L5 Nerve Root Block
title Imaging Findings, Fluoroscopic Time, and Results of the Lumbosacral Selective Nerve Root Block: Focus on the L5 Nerve Root Block
title_full Imaging Findings, Fluoroscopic Time, and Results of the Lumbosacral Selective Nerve Root Block: Focus on the L5 Nerve Root Block
title_fullStr Imaging Findings, Fluoroscopic Time, and Results of the Lumbosacral Selective Nerve Root Block: Focus on the L5 Nerve Root Block
title_full_unstemmed Imaging Findings, Fluoroscopic Time, and Results of the Lumbosacral Selective Nerve Root Block: Focus on the L5 Nerve Root Block
title_short Imaging Findings, Fluoroscopic Time, and Results of the Lumbosacral Selective Nerve Root Block: Focus on the L5 Nerve Root Block
title_sort imaging findings, fluoroscopic time, and results of the lumbosacral selective nerve root block: focus on the l5 nerve root block
topic Pain Management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37736456
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43872
work_keys_str_mv AT serikyakuhisashi imagingfindingsfluoroscopictimeandresultsofthelumbosacralselectivenerverootblockfocusonthel5nerverootblock
AT higashoichiro imagingfindingsfluoroscopictimeandresultsofthelumbosacralselectivenerverootblockfocusonthel5nerverootblock
AT yaratetsuya imagingfindingsfluoroscopictimeandresultsofthelumbosacralselectivenerverootblockfocusonthel5nerverootblock