Cargando…
Validierung der deutschen Version des Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ-D) für Patient*innen mit Schulterbeschwerden
BACKGROUND: With a prevalence of up to 30%, shoulder disorders form the third largest group of musculoskeletal complaints worldwide. Their formation and development are influenced by psychosocial factors such as movement-related fear. One of the internationally most common measurements for quantifyi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36692550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00482-022-00689-z |
_version_ | 1785108124700508160 |
---|---|
author | Pagels, Larissa Lüdtke, Kerstin Schäfer, Axel |
author_facet | Pagels, Larissa Lüdtke, Kerstin Schäfer, Axel |
author_sort | Pagels, Larissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With a prevalence of up to 30%, shoulder disorders form the third largest group of musculoskeletal complaints worldwide. Their formation and development are influenced by psychosocial factors such as movement-related fear. One of the internationally most common measurements for quantifying fear of movement is the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). OBJECTIVES: To investigate the reliability (internal consistency) and validity (structural validity, construct validity, predictive validity) of the FABQ‑D in a shoulder pain population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects with shoulder pain were included in a multicenter cross-sectional study. In addition to fear-avoidance beliefs, pain intensity, subjective impairment in daily life and kinesiophobia were recorded. To this end, the FABQ‑D, numeric rating scale (NRS), Shoulder and Pain Disability Index (SPADI) and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-GV) were used. RESULTS: A total of 49 subjects (24 women and 25 men) with a mean age of 41.8 years (SD = 12.8) were included. The descriptive evaluation at item level showed good internal consistency of the FABQ‑D (Cronbach’s α = 0.88). The homogeneity factor differs significantly between the subscales (Loevinger’s H = 0.66–0.9). The correlation analyses did not show any clear convergence of the FABQ‑D with the TSK-GV (r = 0.3501; p = 0.0137). A divergence to the constructs of the NRS (r = 0.1818; p = 0.2112) and SPADI (r = 0.4415; p = 0.0015) were confirmed. The hypothesis testing resulted in 42.87% of the assumed hypotheses and therefore a low construct validity. The FABQ‑D and the TSK-GV showed a significant influence on the duration of the complaints (R(2) = 0.3652; p ≤ 0.0001). It was also shown that the greatest factors for a high FABQ‑D value were functional impairment (SPADI) and duration of symptoms (R(2) = 0.3066; p = 0.0002). The subgroup analysis showed a significantly higher FABQ‑D value in older subjects (40–65 years; t = 3.8084/df = 47, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: The FABQ‑D is a reliable measurement tool. The construct validity should be further investigated in future studies. This study reproduced results from previous studies in other populations. The FABQ‑D appears to be an adequate measurement tool for quantifying fear of movement in patients with shoulder disorders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10511372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Medizin |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105113722023-09-22 Validierung der deutschen Version des Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ-D) für Patient*innen mit Schulterbeschwerden Pagels, Larissa Lüdtke, Kerstin Schäfer, Axel Schmerz Originalien BACKGROUND: With a prevalence of up to 30%, shoulder disorders form the third largest group of musculoskeletal complaints worldwide. Their formation and development are influenced by psychosocial factors such as movement-related fear. One of the internationally most common measurements for quantifying fear of movement is the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). OBJECTIVES: To investigate the reliability (internal consistency) and validity (structural validity, construct validity, predictive validity) of the FABQ‑D in a shoulder pain population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects with shoulder pain were included in a multicenter cross-sectional study. In addition to fear-avoidance beliefs, pain intensity, subjective impairment in daily life and kinesiophobia were recorded. To this end, the FABQ‑D, numeric rating scale (NRS), Shoulder and Pain Disability Index (SPADI) and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-GV) were used. RESULTS: A total of 49 subjects (24 women and 25 men) with a mean age of 41.8 years (SD = 12.8) were included. The descriptive evaluation at item level showed good internal consistency of the FABQ‑D (Cronbach’s α = 0.88). The homogeneity factor differs significantly between the subscales (Loevinger’s H = 0.66–0.9). The correlation analyses did not show any clear convergence of the FABQ‑D with the TSK-GV (r = 0.3501; p = 0.0137). A divergence to the constructs of the NRS (r = 0.1818; p = 0.2112) and SPADI (r = 0.4415; p = 0.0015) were confirmed. The hypothesis testing resulted in 42.87% of the assumed hypotheses and therefore a low construct validity. The FABQ‑D and the TSK-GV showed a significant influence on the duration of the complaints (R(2) = 0.3652; p ≤ 0.0001). It was also shown that the greatest factors for a high FABQ‑D value were functional impairment (SPADI) and duration of symptoms (R(2) = 0.3066; p = 0.0002). The subgroup analysis showed a significantly higher FABQ‑D value in older subjects (40–65 years; t = 3.8084/df = 47, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: The FABQ‑D is a reliable measurement tool. The construct validity should be further investigated in future studies. This study reproduced results from previous studies in other populations. The FABQ‑D appears to be an adequate measurement tool for quantifying fear of movement in patients with shoulder disorders. Springer Medizin 2023-01-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10511372/ /pubmed/36692550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00482-022-00689-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Originalien Pagels, Larissa Lüdtke, Kerstin Schäfer, Axel Validierung der deutschen Version des Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ-D) für Patient*innen mit Schulterbeschwerden |
title | Validierung der deutschen Version des Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ-D) für Patient*innen mit Schulterbeschwerden |
title_full | Validierung der deutschen Version des Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ-D) für Patient*innen mit Schulterbeschwerden |
title_fullStr | Validierung der deutschen Version des Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ-D) für Patient*innen mit Schulterbeschwerden |
title_full_unstemmed | Validierung der deutschen Version des Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ-D) für Patient*innen mit Schulterbeschwerden |
title_short | Validierung der deutschen Version des Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ-D) für Patient*innen mit Schulterbeschwerden |
title_sort | validierung der deutschen version des fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (fabq-d) für patient*innen mit schulterbeschwerden |
topic | Originalien |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36692550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00482-022-00689-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pagelslarissa validierungderdeutschenversiondesfearavoidancebeliefsquestionnairefabqdfurpatientinnenmitschulterbeschwerden AT ludtkekerstin validierungderdeutschenversiondesfearavoidancebeliefsquestionnairefabqdfurpatientinnenmitschulterbeschwerden AT schaferaxel validierungderdeutschenversiondesfearavoidancebeliefsquestionnairefabqdfurpatientinnenmitschulterbeschwerden |