Cargando…

Evaluation of face shields used during aerosol generating procedures

Transnasal flexible laryngoscopy is considered an aerosol generating procedure. A negative pressure face shield (NPFS) was developed to control aerosol from the patient during laryngoscopy. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the NPFS at controlling virus aerosol compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pratt, Alessandra A., Brown, Grant D., Walsh, Jarrett E., Hoffman, Henry T., Nonnenmann, Matthew W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42403-8
_version_ 1785108146886279168
author Pratt, Alessandra A.
Brown, Grant D.
Walsh, Jarrett E.
Hoffman, Henry T.
Nonnenmann, Matthew W.
author_facet Pratt, Alessandra A.
Brown, Grant D.
Walsh, Jarrett E.
Hoffman, Henry T.
Nonnenmann, Matthew W.
author_sort Pratt, Alessandra A.
collection PubMed
description Transnasal flexible laryngoscopy is considered an aerosol generating procedure. A negative pressure face shield (NPFS) was developed to control aerosol from the patient during laryngoscopy. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the NPFS at controlling virus aerosol compared to a standard disposable plastic face shield. The face shields were placed on a simulated patient coughing machine. MS2 bacteriophage was used as a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 and was aerosolized using the coughing machine. The aerosolized virus was sampled on the inside and outside of the face shields. The virus aerosol concentration was not significantly different between the inside and outside of the traditional plastic face shield (p = 0.12). However, the particle concentrations across all particle sizes measured were significantly decreased outside the face shield. The virus and particle concentrations were significantly decreased (p < 0.01) outside the NPFS operating at a flow rate of 38.6 L per minute (LPM). When the NPFS was operated at 10 LPM, virus concentrations were not significantly different (p = 0.09) across the face shield. However, the number particle concentrations across all particle sizes measured were significantly different (p < 0.05).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10511466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105114662023-09-22 Evaluation of face shields used during aerosol generating procedures Pratt, Alessandra A. Brown, Grant D. Walsh, Jarrett E. Hoffman, Henry T. Nonnenmann, Matthew W. Sci Rep Article Transnasal flexible laryngoscopy is considered an aerosol generating procedure. A negative pressure face shield (NPFS) was developed to control aerosol from the patient during laryngoscopy. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the NPFS at controlling virus aerosol compared to a standard disposable plastic face shield. The face shields were placed on a simulated patient coughing machine. MS2 bacteriophage was used as a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 and was aerosolized using the coughing machine. The aerosolized virus was sampled on the inside and outside of the face shields. The virus aerosol concentration was not significantly different between the inside and outside of the traditional plastic face shield (p = 0.12). However, the particle concentrations across all particle sizes measured were significantly decreased outside the face shield. The virus and particle concentrations were significantly decreased (p < 0.01) outside the NPFS operating at a flow rate of 38.6 L per minute (LPM). When the NPFS was operated at 10 LPM, virus concentrations were not significantly different (p = 0.09) across the face shield. However, the number particle concentrations across all particle sizes measured were significantly different (p < 0.05). Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10511466/ /pubmed/37730888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42403-8 Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Pratt, Alessandra A.
Brown, Grant D.
Walsh, Jarrett E.
Hoffman, Henry T.
Nonnenmann, Matthew W.
Evaluation of face shields used during aerosol generating procedures
title Evaluation of face shields used during aerosol generating procedures
title_full Evaluation of face shields used during aerosol generating procedures
title_fullStr Evaluation of face shields used during aerosol generating procedures
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of face shields used during aerosol generating procedures
title_short Evaluation of face shields used during aerosol generating procedures
title_sort evaluation of face shields used during aerosol generating procedures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42403-8
work_keys_str_mv AT prattalessandraa evaluationoffaceshieldsusedduringaerosolgeneratingprocedures
AT browngrantd evaluationoffaceshieldsusedduringaerosolgeneratingprocedures
AT walshjarrette evaluationoffaceshieldsusedduringaerosolgeneratingprocedures
AT hoffmanhenryt evaluationoffaceshieldsusedduringaerosolgeneratingprocedures
AT nonnenmannmattheww evaluationoffaceshieldsusedduringaerosolgeneratingprocedures