Cargando…

Feasibility and efficiency of delayed ovarian stimulation and metaphase II oocyte banking for fertility preservation and childbearing desire after fertility-impairing treatment

The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of delayed ovarian stimulation and metaphase II oocyte banking for fertility preservation after fertility-impairing treatment regardless of the initial disease. We conducted a cohort study based on population of women < 40 years...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miquel, Laura, Liotta, Julie, Hours, Alice, Bottin, Pauline, Castel, Pierre, Perrin, Jeanne, Guillemain, Catherine, Courbiere, Blandine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42583-3
_version_ 1785108151873306624
author Miquel, Laura
Liotta, Julie
Hours, Alice
Bottin, Pauline
Castel, Pierre
Perrin, Jeanne
Guillemain, Catherine
Courbiere, Blandine
author_facet Miquel, Laura
Liotta, Julie
Hours, Alice
Bottin, Pauline
Castel, Pierre
Perrin, Jeanne
Guillemain, Catherine
Courbiere, Blandine
author_sort Miquel, Laura
collection PubMed
description The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of delayed ovarian stimulation and metaphase II oocyte banking for fertility preservation after fertility-impairing treatment regardless of the initial disease. We conducted a cohort study based on population of women < 40 years of age with diminished ovarian reserve caused by fertility-impairing treatment (n = 129). Three groups of women were compared according to the type of initial disease: hematological malignancies, solid tumors, and benign diseases. The primary endpoint was the number of metaphase II oocytes collected per woman. We studied the cumulative live-birth rate per cycle with fertilized metaphase II oocyte, for women who wanted to conceive. We studied 245 delayed controlled ovarian stimulation cycles in 129 women: 201 for fertility preservation and 44 for in vitro fertilization and fresh embryo transfers. The number of metaphase II oocytes collected per woman after banking was similar in the three groups, with a mean of 10.7 ± 4.6, 12.3 ± 9.1, and 10.1 ± 7.6 metaphase II oocytes (p = 0.46), respectively. In the subgroup of women who wanted to conceive, the cumulative live birth rate per woman was 38%, with 8 live births for these 21 women. After fertility-impairing treatment, practitioners should discuss a fertility preservation procedure for banking metaphase II oocytes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10511488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105114882023-09-22 Feasibility and efficiency of delayed ovarian stimulation and metaphase II oocyte banking for fertility preservation and childbearing desire after fertility-impairing treatment Miquel, Laura Liotta, Julie Hours, Alice Bottin, Pauline Castel, Pierre Perrin, Jeanne Guillemain, Catherine Courbiere, Blandine Sci Rep Article The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of delayed ovarian stimulation and metaphase II oocyte banking for fertility preservation after fertility-impairing treatment regardless of the initial disease. We conducted a cohort study based on population of women < 40 years of age with diminished ovarian reserve caused by fertility-impairing treatment (n = 129). Three groups of women were compared according to the type of initial disease: hematological malignancies, solid tumors, and benign diseases. The primary endpoint was the number of metaphase II oocytes collected per woman. We studied the cumulative live-birth rate per cycle with fertilized metaphase II oocyte, for women who wanted to conceive. We studied 245 delayed controlled ovarian stimulation cycles in 129 women: 201 for fertility preservation and 44 for in vitro fertilization and fresh embryo transfers. The number of metaphase II oocytes collected per woman after banking was similar in the three groups, with a mean of 10.7 ± 4.6, 12.3 ± 9.1, and 10.1 ± 7.6 metaphase II oocytes (p = 0.46), respectively. In the subgroup of women who wanted to conceive, the cumulative live birth rate per woman was 38%, with 8 live births for these 21 women. After fertility-impairing treatment, practitioners should discuss a fertility preservation procedure for banking metaphase II oocytes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10511488/ /pubmed/37730827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42583-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Miquel, Laura
Liotta, Julie
Hours, Alice
Bottin, Pauline
Castel, Pierre
Perrin, Jeanne
Guillemain, Catherine
Courbiere, Blandine
Feasibility and efficiency of delayed ovarian stimulation and metaphase II oocyte banking for fertility preservation and childbearing desire after fertility-impairing treatment
title Feasibility and efficiency of delayed ovarian stimulation and metaphase II oocyte banking for fertility preservation and childbearing desire after fertility-impairing treatment
title_full Feasibility and efficiency of delayed ovarian stimulation and metaphase II oocyte banking for fertility preservation and childbearing desire after fertility-impairing treatment
title_fullStr Feasibility and efficiency of delayed ovarian stimulation and metaphase II oocyte banking for fertility preservation and childbearing desire after fertility-impairing treatment
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and efficiency of delayed ovarian stimulation and metaphase II oocyte banking for fertility preservation and childbearing desire after fertility-impairing treatment
title_short Feasibility and efficiency of delayed ovarian stimulation and metaphase II oocyte banking for fertility preservation and childbearing desire after fertility-impairing treatment
title_sort feasibility and efficiency of delayed ovarian stimulation and metaphase ii oocyte banking for fertility preservation and childbearing desire after fertility-impairing treatment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42583-3
work_keys_str_mv AT miquellaura feasibilityandefficiencyofdelayedovarianstimulationandmetaphaseiioocytebankingforfertilitypreservationandchildbearingdesireafterfertilityimpairingtreatment
AT liottajulie feasibilityandefficiencyofdelayedovarianstimulationandmetaphaseiioocytebankingforfertilitypreservationandchildbearingdesireafterfertilityimpairingtreatment
AT hoursalice feasibilityandefficiencyofdelayedovarianstimulationandmetaphaseiioocytebankingforfertilitypreservationandchildbearingdesireafterfertilityimpairingtreatment
AT bottinpauline feasibilityandefficiencyofdelayedovarianstimulationandmetaphaseiioocytebankingforfertilitypreservationandchildbearingdesireafterfertilityimpairingtreatment
AT castelpierre feasibilityandefficiencyofdelayedovarianstimulationandmetaphaseiioocytebankingforfertilitypreservationandchildbearingdesireafterfertilityimpairingtreatment
AT perrinjeanne feasibilityandefficiencyofdelayedovarianstimulationandmetaphaseiioocytebankingforfertilitypreservationandchildbearingdesireafterfertilityimpairingtreatment
AT guillemaincatherine feasibilityandefficiencyofdelayedovarianstimulationandmetaphaseiioocytebankingforfertilitypreservationandchildbearingdesireafterfertilityimpairingtreatment
AT courbiereblandine feasibilityandefficiencyofdelayedovarianstimulationandmetaphaseiioocytebankingforfertilitypreservationandchildbearingdesireafterfertilityimpairingtreatment