Cargando…

Predicting ‘Brainage’ in late childhood to adolescence (6-17yrs) using structural MRI, morphometric similarity, and machine learning

Brain development is regularly studied using structural MRI. Recently, studies have used a combination of statistical learning and large-scale imaging databases of healthy children to predict an individual’s age from structural MRI. This data-driven, predicted ‘Brainage’ typically differs from the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griffiths-King, Daniel, Wood, Amanda G., Novak, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42414-5
_version_ 1785108165730238464
author Griffiths-King, Daniel
Wood, Amanda G.
Novak, Jan
author_facet Griffiths-King, Daniel
Wood, Amanda G.
Novak, Jan
author_sort Griffiths-King, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Brain development is regularly studied using structural MRI. Recently, studies have used a combination of statistical learning and large-scale imaging databases of healthy children to predict an individual’s age from structural MRI. This data-driven, predicted ‘Brainage’ typically differs from the subjects chronological age, with this difference a potential measure of individual difference. Few studies have leveraged higher-order or connectomic representations of structural MRI data for this Brainage approach. We leveraged morphometric similarity as a network-level approach to structural MRI to generate predictive models of age. We benchmarked these novel Brainage approaches using morphometric similarity against more typical, single feature (i.e., cortical thickness) approaches. We showed that these novel methods did not outperform cortical thickness or cortical volume measures. All models were significantly biased by age, but robust to motion confounds. The main results show that, whilst morphometric similarity mapping may be a novel way to leverage additional information from a T1-weighted structural MRI beyond individual features, in the context of a Brainage framework, morphometric similarity does not provide more accurate predictions of age. Morphometric similarity as a network-level approach to structural MRI may be poorly positioned to study individual differences in brain development in healthy participants in this way.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10511546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105115462023-09-22 Predicting ‘Brainage’ in late childhood to adolescence (6-17yrs) using structural MRI, morphometric similarity, and machine learning Griffiths-King, Daniel Wood, Amanda G. Novak, Jan Sci Rep Article Brain development is regularly studied using structural MRI. Recently, studies have used a combination of statistical learning and large-scale imaging databases of healthy children to predict an individual’s age from structural MRI. This data-driven, predicted ‘Brainage’ typically differs from the subjects chronological age, with this difference a potential measure of individual difference. Few studies have leveraged higher-order or connectomic representations of structural MRI data for this Brainage approach. We leveraged morphometric similarity as a network-level approach to structural MRI to generate predictive models of age. We benchmarked these novel Brainage approaches using morphometric similarity against more typical, single feature (i.e., cortical thickness) approaches. We showed that these novel methods did not outperform cortical thickness or cortical volume measures. All models were significantly biased by age, but robust to motion confounds. The main results show that, whilst morphometric similarity mapping may be a novel way to leverage additional information from a T1-weighted structural MRI beyond individual features, in the context of a Brainage framework, morphometric similarity does not provide more accurate predictions of age. Morphometric similarity as a network-level approach to structural MRI may be poorly positioned to study individual differences in brain development in healthy participants in this way. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10511546/ /pubmed/37730747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42414-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Griffiths-King, Daniel
Wood, Amanda G.
Novak, Jan
Predicting ‘Brainage’ in late childhood to adolescence (6-17yrs) using structural MRI, morphometric similarity, and machine learning
title Predicting ‘Brainage’ in late childhood to adolescence (6-17yrs) using structural MRI, morphometric similarity, and machine learning
title_full Predicting ‘Brainage’ in late childhood to adolescence (6-17yrs) using structural MRI, morphometric similarity, and machine learning
title_fullStr Predicting ‘Brainage’ in late childhood to adolescence (6-17yrs) using structural MRI, morphometric similarity, and machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Predicting ‘Brainage’ in late childhood to adolescence (6-17yrs) using structural MRI, morphometric similarity, and machine learning
title_short Predicting ‘Brainage’ in late childhood to adolescence (6-17yrs) using structural MRI, morphometric similarity, and machine learning
title_sort predicting ‘brainage’ in late childhood to adolescence (6-17yrs) using structural mri, morphometric similarity, and machine learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42414-5
work_keys_str_mv AT griffithskingdaniel predictingbrainageinlatechildhoodtoadolescence617yrsusingstructuralmrimorphometricsimilarityandmachinelearning
AT woodamandag predictingbrainageinlatechildhoodtoadolescence617yrsusingstructuralmrimorphometricsimilarityandmachinelearning
AT novakjan predictingbrainageinlatechildhoodtoadolescence617yrsusingstructuralmrimorphometricsimilarityandmachinelearning