Cargando…

Trends and practices following the 2016 hydroxychloroquine screening guidelines

This study aimed to understand the profile of hydroxychloroquine-treated patients, referral patterns, and dosing and to assess the adherence of eye care providers to the latest 2016 screening guidelines provided by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Patients were identified using electronic heal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalaw, Fritz Gerald P., Arnett, Justin, Baxter, Sally L., Walker, Evan, Pedersen, Brian, Borooah, Shyamanga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42816-5
_version_ 1785108185148817408
author Kalaw, Fritz Gerald P.
Arnett, Justin
Baxter, Sally L.
Walker, Evan
Pedersen, Brian
Borooah, Shyamanga
author_facet Kalaw, Fritz Gerald P.
Arnett, Justin
Baxter, Sally L.
Walker, Evan
Pedersen, Brian
Borooah, Shyamanga
author_sort Kalaw, Fritz Gerald P.
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to understand the profile of hydroxychloroquine-treated patients, referral patterns, and dosing and to assess the adherence of eye care providers to the latest 2016 screening guidelines provided by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Patients were identified using electronic health records (EHR) taking hydroxychloroquine and were seen by optometrists, retinal specialists, and non-retinal ophthalmologists. Review of EHR data includes demographic characteristics, indications, and dosing profile of hydroxychloroquine use, eye care provider managing the patient, and imaging modalities performed. A total of 166 patients were included in the study. The most common indications for screening were systemic lupus erythematosus and discoid lupus (52.4%) followed by rheumatoid arthritis (18.7%) and Sjögren’s syndrome (9.6%). Ninety-two (55.4%) patients were on a higher-than-recommended dose of > 5 mg/kg/day. Patients who weighed less (mean 63.9 kg) were taking a higher-than-recommended dose (vs. 81.5 kg, p < 0.001). Although retinal specialists adhered best to the use of all three recommended imaging modalities, visual field testing was done appropriately for only 8.3% of Asian and 71.1% of non-Asian patients. In conclusion, there is substantial variability in screening by ophthalmic providers and prescribing practices compared with the current recommendations. In particular, there is a marked deficiency in correct visual field testing in Asian patients. These findings are important to highlight potential interventions to improve screening for hydroxychloroquine toxicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10511627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105116272023-09-22 Trends and practices following the 2016 hydroxychloroquine screening guidelines Kalaw, Fritz Gerald P. Arnett, Justin Baxter, Sally L. Walker, Evan Pedersen, Brian Borooah, Shyamanga Sci Rep Article This study aimed to understand the profile of hydroxychloroquine-treated patients, referral patterns, and dosing and to assess the adherence of eye care providers to the latest 2016 screening guidelines provided by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Patients were identified using electronic health records (EHR) taking hydroxychloroquine and were seen by optometrists, retinal specialists, and non-retinal ophthalmologists. Review of EHR data includes demographic characteristics, indications, and dosing profile of hydroxychloroquine use, eye care provider managing the patient, and imaging modalities performed. A total of 166 patients were included in the study. The most common indications for screening were systemic lupus erythematosus and discoid lupus (52.4%) followed by rheumatoid arthritis (18.7%) and Sjögren’s syndrome (9.6%). Ninety-two (55.4%) patients were on a higher-than-recommended dose of > 5 mg/kg/day. Patients who weighed less (mean 63.9 kg) were taking a higher-than-recommended dose (vs. 81.5 kg, p < 0.001). Although retinal specialists adhered best to the use of all three recommended imaging modalities, visual field testing was done appropriately for only 8.3% of Asian and 71.1% of non-Asian patients. In conclusion, there is substantial variability in screening by ophthalmic providers and prescribing practices compared with the current recommendations. In particular, there is a marked deficiency in correct visual field testing in Asian patients. These findings are important to highlight potential interventions to improve screening for hydroxychloroquine toxicity. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10511627/ /pubmed/37730825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42816-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kalaw, Fritz Gerald P.
Arnett, Justin
Baxter, Sally L.
Walker, Evan
Pedersen, Brian
Borooah, Shyamanga
Trends and practices following the 2016 hydroxychloroquine screening guidelines
title Trends and practices following the 2016 hydroxychloroquine screening guidelines
title_full Trends and practices following the 2016 hydroxychloroquine screening guidelines
title_fullStr Trends and practices following the 2016 hydroxychloroquine screening guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Trends and practices following the 2016 hydroxychloroquine screening guidelines
title_short Trends and practices following the 2016 hydroxychloroquine screening guidelines
title_sort trends and practices following the 2016 hydroxychloroquine screening guidelines
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42816-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kalawfritzgeraldp trendsandpracticesfollowingthe2016hydroxychloroquinescreeningguidelines
AT arnettjustin trendsandpracticesfollowingthe2016hydroxychloroquinescreeningguidelines
AT baxtersallyl trendsandpracticesfollowingthe2016hydroxychloroquinescreeningguidelines
AT walkerevan trendsandpracticesfollowingthe2016hydroxychloroquinescreeningguidelines
AT pedersenbrian trendsandpracticesfollowingthe2016hydroxychloroquinescreeningguidelines
AT borooahshyamanga trendsandpracticesfollowingthe2016hydroxychloroquinescreeningguidelines