Cargando…

Behaviour change techniques taxonomy v1: Feedback to inform the development of an ontology

Background: To build cumulative evidence about what works in behaviour change interventions, efforts have been made to develop classification systems for specifying the content of interventions. The Behaviour Change Techniques (BCT) Taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1) is one of the most widely used classifications...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corker, Elizabeth, Marques, Marta M., Johnston, Marie, West, Robert, Hastings, Janna, Michie, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745778
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18002.2
_version_ 1785108232647213056
author Corker, Elizabeth
Marques, Marta M.
Johnston, Marie
West, Robert
Hastings, Janna
Michie, Susan
author_facet Corker, Elizabeth
Marques, Marta M.
Johnston, Marie
West, Robert
Hastings, Janna
Michie, Susan
author_sort Corker, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description Background: To build cumulative evidence about what works in behaviour change interventions, efforts have been made to develop classification systems for specifying the content of interventions. The Behaviour Change Techniques (BCT) Taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1) is one of the most widely used classifications of behaviour change techniques across a variety of behaviours. The BCTTv1 was intentionally named version 1 to allow for further revisions to the taxonomy. This study aimed to gather data to improve the BCTTv1 and provide recommendations for developing it into a more elaborated knowledge structure, an ontology.  Methods: Feedback from users of BCTTv1 about limitations and proposed improvements was collected through the BCT website, user survey, researchers and experts involved in the Human Behaviour-Change Project, and a consultation. In addition, relevant published research reports and other classification systems of BCTs were analysed. These data were synthesised to produce recommendations to inform the development of an ontology of BCTs. Results: A total of 282 comments from six sources were reviewed and synthesised into four categories of suggestions: additional BCTs, amendments to labels and definitions of specific BCTs, amendments to the groupings, and general improvements. Feedback suggested some lack of clarity regarding understanding and identifying techniques from labels, definitions, and examples; distinctions and relations between BCTs; and knowing what they would look like in practice. Three recommendations to improve the BCTTv1 resulted from this analysis: to review the label and definition of each BCT, the 16 groupings of BCTs, and the examples illustrating BCTs. Conclusions : This review of feedback about BCTTv1 identified the need to improve the precision and knowledge structure of the current taxonomy. A BCT ontology would enable the specification of relationships between BCTs, more precise definitions, and allow better interoperability with other ontologies. This ontology will be developed as part of the Human Behaviour-Change Project.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10511844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105118442023-09-22 Behaviour change techniques taxonomy v1: Feedback to inform the development of an ontology Corker, Elizabeth Marques, Marta M. Johnston, Marie West, Robert Hastings, Janna Michie, Susan Wellcome Open Res Research Article Background: To build cumulative evidence about what works in behaviour change interventions, efforts have been made to develop classification systems for specifying the content of interventions. The Behaviour Change Techniques (BCT) Taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1) is one of the most widely used classifications of behaviour change techniques across a variety of behaviours. The BCTTv1 was intentionally named version 1 to allow for further revisions to the taxonomy. This study aimed to gather data to improve the BCTTv1 and provide recommendations for developing it into a more elaborated knowledge structure, an ontology.  Methods: Feedback from users of BCTTv1 about limitations and proposed improvements was collected through the BCT website, user survey, researchers and experts involved in the Human Behaviour-Change Project, and a consultation. In addition, relevant published research reports and other classification systems of BCTs were analysed. These data were synthesised to produce recommendations to inform the development of an ontology of BCTs. Results: A total of 282 comments from six sources were reviewed and synthesised into four categories of suggestions: additional BCTs, amendments to labels and definitions of specific BCTs, amendments to the groupings, and general improvements. Feedback suggested some lack of clarity regarding understanding and identifying techniques from labels, definitions, and examples; distinctions and relations between BCTs; and knowing what they would look like in practice. Three recommendations to improve the BCTTv1 resulted from this analysis: to review the label and definition of each BCT, the 16 groupings of BCTs, and the examples illustrating BCTs. Conclusions : This review of feedback about BCTTv1 identified the need to improve the precision and knowledge structure of the current taxonomy. A BCT ontology would enable the specification of relationships between BCTs, more precise definitions, and allow better interoperability with other ontologies. This ontology will be developed as part of the Human Behaviour-Change Project. F1000 Research Limited 2023-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10511844/ /pubmed/37745778 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18002.2 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Corker E et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Corker, Elizabeth
Marques, Marta M.
Johnston, Marie
West, Robert
Hastings, Janna
Michie, Susan
Behaviour change techniques taxonomy v1: Feedback to inform the development of an ontology
title Behaviour change techniques taxonomy v1: Feedback to inform the development of an ontology
title_full Behaviour change techniques taxonomy v1: Feedback to inform the development of an ontology
title_fullStr Behaviour change techniques taxonomy v1: Feedback to inform the development of an ontology
title_full_unstemmed Behaviour change techniques taxonomy v1: Feedback to inform the development of an ontology
title_short Behaviour change techniques taxonomy v1: Feedback to inform the development of an ontology
title_sort behaviour change techniques taxonomy v1: feedback to inform the development of an ontology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745778
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18002.2
work_keys_str_mv AT corkerelizabeth behaviourchangetechniquestaxonomyv1feedbacktoinformthedevelopmentofanontology
AT marquesmartam behaviourchangetechniquestaxonomyv1feedbacktoinformthedevelopmentofanontology
AT johnstonmarie behaviourchangetechniquestaxonomyv1feedbacktoinformthedevelopmentofanontology
AT westrobert behaviourchangetechniquestaxonomyv1feedbacktoinformthedevelopmentofanontology
AT hastingsjanna behaviourchangetechniquestaxonomyv1feedbacktoinformthedevelopmentofanontology
AT michiesusan behaviourchangetechniquestaxonomyv1feedbacktoinformthedevelopmentofanontology