Cargando…

The impact of social protection interventions on treatment and socioeconomic outcomes of people with tuberculosis and their households: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading cause of death due to infectious disease worldwide. People with TB and their households often suffer social and economic losses due to the cost of tuberculosis care. The World Health Organization 2015 End TB strategy called for socioeconomic support through...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hudson, Mollie, Todd, Heather, Nalugwa, Talemwa, Boccia, Delia, Wingfield, Tom, Shete, Priya B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37744729
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18807.1
_version_ 1785108234282991616
author Hudson, Mollie
Todd, Heather
Nalugwa, Talemwa
Boccia, Delia
Wingfield, Tom
Shete, Priya B.
author_facet Hudson, Mollie
Todd, Heather
Nalugwa, Talemwa
Boccia, Delia
Wingfield, Tom
Shete, Priya B.
author_sort Hudson, Mollie
collection PubMed
description Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading cause of death due to infectious disease worldwide. People with TB and their households often suffer social and economic losses due to the cost of tuberculosis care. The World Health Organization 2015 End TB strategy called for socioeconomic support through social protection interventions. Social protection has the potential to enable people with TB and their households to break the cycle of TB and poverty, thereby improving both treatment and socioeconomic outcomes. This study aims to evaluate whether people with TB who are recipients of social protection interventions have better treatment and socioeconomic outcomes than those who are not recipients of social protection interventions. Methods: We will systematically review literature published in English between 2012 and 2021 from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, and grey literature from Google Scholar and selected, relevant databases. We will include studies that describe a social protection intervention (as defined by the World Bank) and report on TB treatment outcomes and/or socioeconomic outcomes. We will only include studies pertaining to populations in low-and-middle-income countries and/or countries with high TB burden. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for non-randomised controlled studies. If sufficient quantitative data are available, we will perform a meta-analysis of aggregated outcomes. Lastly, we will use the Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to describe the overall quality of evidence. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review, as all data extraction and analysis will be conducted on published documents. We will disseminate this protocol through conference presentations. The systematic review has been registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42022382181).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10511851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105118512023-09-22 The impact of social protection interventions on treatment and socioeconomic outcomes of people with tuberculosis and their households: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Hudson, Mollie Todd, Heather Nalugwa, Talemwa Boccia, Delia Wingfield, Tom Shete, Priya B. Wellcome Open Res Study Protocol Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading cause of death due to infectious disease worldwide. People with TB and their households often suffer social and economic losses due to the cost of tuberculosis care. The World Health Organization 2015 End TB strategy called for socioeconomic support through social protection interventions. Social protection has the potential to enable people with TB and their households to break the cycle of TB and poverty, thereby improving both treatment and socioeconomic outcomes. This study aims to evaluate whether people with TB who are recipients of social protection interventions have better treatment and socioeconomic outcomes than those who are not recipients of social protection interventions. Methods: We will systematically review literature published in English between 2012 and 2021 from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, and grey literature from Google Scholar and selected, relevant databases. We will include studies that describe a social protection intervention (as defined by the World Bank) and report on TB treatment outcomes and/or socioeconomic outcomes. We will only include studies pertaining to populations in low-and-middle-income countries and/or countries with high TB burden. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for non-randomised controlled studies. If sufficient quantitative data are available, we will perform a meta-analysis of aggregated outcomes. Lastly, we will use the Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to describe the overall quality of evidence. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review, as all data extraction and analysis will be conducted on published documents. We will disseminate this protocol through conference presentations. The systematic review has been registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42022382181). F1000 Research Limited 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10511851/ /pubmed/37744729 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18807.1 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Hudson M et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Hudson, Mollie
Todd, Heather
Nalugwa, Talemwa
Boccia, Delia
Wingfield, Tom
Shete, Priya B.
The impact of social protection interventions on treatment and socioeconomic outcomes of people with tuberculosis and their households: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The impact of social protection interventions on treatment and socioeconomic outcomes of people with tuberculosis and their households: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The impact of social protection interventions on treatment and socioeconomic outcomes of people with tuberculosis and their households: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The impact of social protection interventions on treatment and socioeconomic outcomes of people with tuberculosis and their households: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The impact of social protection interventions on treatment and socioeconomic outcomes of people with tuberculosis and their households: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The impact of social protection interventions on treatment and socioeconomic outcomes of people with tuberculosis and their households: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort impact of social protection interventions on treatment and socioeconomic outcomes of people with tuberculosis and their households: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37744729
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18807.1
work_keys_str_mv AT hudsonmollie theimpactofsocialprotectioninterventionsontreatmentandsocioeconomicoutcomesofpeoplewithtuberculosisandtheirhouseholdsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT toddheather theimpactofsocialprotectioninterventionsontreatmentandsocioeconomicoutcomesofpeoplewithtuberculosisandtheirhouseholdsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nalugwatalemwa theimpactofsocialprotectioninterventionsontreatmentandsocioeconomicoutcomesofpeoplewithtuberculosisandtheirhouseholdsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bocciadelia theimpactofsocialprotectioninterventionsontreatmentandsocioeconomicoutcomesofpeoplewithtuberculosisandtheirhouseholdsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wingfieldtom theimpactofsocialprotectioninterventionsontreatmentandsocioeconomicoutcomesofpeoplewithtuberculosisandtheirhouseholdsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shetepriyab theimpactofsocialprotectioninterventionsontreatmentandsocioeconomicoutcomesofpeoplewithtuberculosisandtheirhouseholdsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hudsonmollie impactofsocialprotectioninterventionsontreatmentandsocioeconomicoutcomesofpeoplewithtuberculosisandtheirhouseholdsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT toddheather impactofsocialprotectioninterventionsontreatmentandsocioeconomicoutcomesofpeoplewithtuberculosisandtheirhouseholdsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nalugwatalemwa impactofsocialprotectioninterventionsontreatmentandsocioeconomicoutcomesofpeoplewithtuberculosisandtheirhouseholdsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bocciadelia impactofsocialprotectioninterventionsontreatmentandsocioeconomicoutcomesofpeoplewithtuberculosisandtheirhouseholdsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wingfieldtom impactofsocialprotectioninterventionsontreatmentandsocioeconomicoutcomesofpeoplewithtuberculosisandtheirhouseholdsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shetepriyab impactofsocialprotectioninterventionsontreatmentandsocioeconomicoutcomesofpeoplewithtuberculosisandtheirhouseholdsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis