Cargando…

Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Stress-related disorders have become a major challenge for society and are associated with rising levels of sick leave. The provision of support to facilitate the return to work (RTW) for this patient group is of great importance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beno, Anja, Bertilsson, Monica, Holmgren, Kristina, Glise, Kristina, Pousette, Anders, Segerfelt, Karin, Björk, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02151-0
_version_ 1785108387463168000
author Beno, Anja
Bertilsson, Monica
Holmgren, Kristina
Glise, Kristina
Pousette, Anders
Segerfelt, Karin
Björk, Lisa
author_facet Beno, Anja
Bertilsson, Monica
Holmgren, Kristina
Glise, Kristina
Pousette, Anders
Segerfelt, Karin
Björk, Lisa
author_sort Beno, Anja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stress-related disorders have become a major challenge for society and are associated with rising levels of sick leave. The provision of support to facilitate the return to work (RTW) for this patient group is of great importance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a new systematic procedure with collaboration between general practitioners (GPs), rehabilitation coordinators (RCs) and employers could reduce sick leave days for this patient group. METHOD: Employed patients with stress-related diagnoses seeking care at primary health care centres (PHCCs) were included in either the intervention group (n = 54), following the systematic intervention procedure, or the control group (n = 58), receiving treatment as usual (TAU). The intervention included a) a training day for participant GPs and RCs, b) a standardised procedure for GPs and RCs to follow after training, c) the opportunity to receive clinical advice from specialist physicians in the research group. Outcome measures for RTW were sick leave days. RESULTS: The median number of registered gross sick leave days was lower for the control group at six, 12 and 24 months after inclusion, but the difference was not statistically significant. The control group had significantly fewer net sick leave days at three months (p = 0.03) at six months (p = 0.00) and at 12-months follow-up (p = 0.01). At 24 months, this difference was no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: The PRIMA intervention, which applied a standardized procedure for employer involvement in the rehabilitation process for patients with stress-related disorders, actually increased time to RTW compared to TAU. However, at 24 months, the benefit of TAU could no longer be confirmed. The study was registered on 16/01/2017 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03022760). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-023-02151-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10512560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105125602023-09-22 Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial Beno, Anja Bertilsson, Monica Holmgren, Kristina Glise, Kristina Pousette, Anders Segerfelt, Karin Björk, Lisa BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Stress-related disorders have become a major challenge for society and are associated with rising levels of sick leave. The provision of support to facilitate the return to work (RTW) for this patient group is of great importance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a new systematic procedure with collaboration between general practitioners (GPs), rehabilitation coordinators (RCs) and employers could reduce sick leave days for this patient group. METHOD: Employed patients with stress-related diagnoses seeking care at primary health care centres (PHCCs) were included in either the intervention group (n = 54), following the systematic intervention procedure, or the control group (n = 58), receiving treatment as usual (TAU). The intervention included a) a training day for participant GPs and RCs, b) a standardised procedure for GPs and RCs to follow after training, c) the opportunity to receive clinical advice from specialist physicians in the research group. Outcome measures for RTW were sick leave days. RESULTS: The median number of registered gross sick leave days was lower for the control group at six, 12 and 24 months after inclusion, but the difference was not statistically significant. The control group had significantly fewer net sick leave days at three months (p = 0.03) at six months (p = 0.00) and at 12-months follow-up (p = 0.01). At 24 months, this difference was no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: The PRIMA intervention, which applied a standardized procedure for employer involvement in the rehabilitation process for patients with stress-related disorders, actually increased time to RTW compared to TAU. However, at 24 months, the benefit of TAU could no longer be confirmed. The study was registered on 16/01/2017 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03022760). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-023-02151-0. BioMed Central 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10512560/ /pubmed/37730561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02151-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Beno, Anja
Bertilsson, Monica
Holmgren, Kristina
Glise, Kristina
Pousette, Anders
Segerfelt, Karin
Björk, Lisa
Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial
title Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_short Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_sort does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02151-0
work_keys_str_mv AT benoanja doesemployerinvolvementinprimaryhealthcareenhancereturntoworkforpatientswithstressrelatedmentaldisordersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bertilssonmonica doesemployerinvolvementinprimaryhealthcareenhancereturntoworkforpatientswithstressrelatedmentaldisordersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT holmgrenkristina doesemployerinvolvementinprimaryhealthcareenhancereturntoworkforpatientswithstressrelatedmentaldisordersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT glisekristina doesemployerinvolvementinprimaryhealthcareenhancereturntoworkforpatientswithstressrelatedmentaldisordersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pousetteanders doesemployerinvolvementinprimaryhealthcareenhancereturntoworkforpatientswithstressrelatedmentaldisordersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT segerfeltkarin doesemployerinvolvementinprimaryhealthcareenhancereturntoworkforpatientswithstressrelatedmentaldisordersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bjorklisa doesemployerinvolvementinprimaryhealthcareenhancereturntoworkforpatientswithstressrelatedmentaldisordersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial