Cargando…
Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Stress-related disorders have become a major challenge for society and are associated with rising levels of sick leave. The provision of support to facilitate the return to work (RTW) for this patient group is of great importance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a ne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02151-0 |
_version_ | 1785108387463168000 |
---|---|
author | Beno, Anja Bertilsson, Monica Holmgren, Kristina Glise, Kristina Pousette, Anders Segerfelt, Karin Björk, Lisa |
author_facet | Beno, Anja Bertilsson, Monica Holmgren, Kristina Glise, Kristina Pousette, Anders Segerfelt, Karin Björk, Lisa |
author_sort | Beno, Anja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stress-related disorders have become a major challenge for society and are associated with rising levels of sick leave. The provision of support to facilitate the return to work (RTW) for this patient group is of great importance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a new systematic procedure with collaboration between general practitioners (GPs), rehabilitation coordinators (RCs) and employers could reduce sick leave days for this patient group. METHOD: Employed patients with stress-related diagnoses seeking care at primary health care centres (PHCCs) were included in either the intervention group (n = 54), following the systematic intervention procedure, or the control group (n = 58), receiving treatment as usual (TAU). The intervention included a) a training day for participant GPs and RCs, b) a standardised procedure for GPs and RCs to follow after training, c) the opportunity to receive clinical advice from specialist physicians in the research group. Outcome measures for RTW were sick leave days. RESULTS: The median number of registered gross sick leave days was lower for the control group at six, 12 and 24 months after inclusion, but the difference was not statistically significant. The control group had significantly fewer net sick leave days at three months (p = 0.03) at six months (p = 0.00) and at 12-months follow-up (p = 0.01). At 24 months, this difference was no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: The PRIMA intervention, which applied a standardized procedure for employer involvement in the rehabilitation process for patients with stress-related disorders, actually increased time to RTW compared to TAU. However, at 24 months, the benefit of TAU could no longer be confirmed. The study was registered on 16/01/2017 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03022760). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-023-02151-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10512560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105125602023-09-22 Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial Beno, Anja Bertilsson, Monica Holmgren, Kristina Glise, Kristina Pousette, Anders Segerfelt, Karin Björk, Lisa BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Stress-related disorders have become a major challenge for society and are associated with rising levels of sick leave. The provision of support to facilitate the return to work (RTW) for this patient group is of great importance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a new systematic procedure with collaboration between general practitioners (GPs), rehabilitation coordinators (RCs) and employers could reduce sick leave days for this patient group. METHOD: Employed patients with stress-related diagnoses seeking care at primary health care centres (PHCCs) were included in either the intervention group (n = 54), following the systematic intervention procedure, or the control group (n = 58), receiving treatment as usual (TAU). The intervention included a) a training day for participant GPs and RCs, b) a standardised procedure for GPs and RCs to follow after training, c) the opportunity to receive clinical advice from specialist physicians in the research group. Outcome measures for RTW were sick leave days. RESULTS: The median number of registered gross sick leave days was lower for the control group at six, 12 and 24 months after inclusion, but the difference was not statistically significant. The control group had significantly fewer net sick leave days at three months (p = 0.03) at six months (p = 0.00) and at 12-months follow-up (p = 0.01). At 24 months, this difference was no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: The PRIMA intervention, which applied a standardized procedure for employer involvement in the rehabilitation process for patients with stress-related disorders, actually increased time to RTW compared to TAU. However, at 24 months, the benefit of TAU could no longer be confirmed. The study was registered on 16/01/2017 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03022760). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-023-02151-0. BioMed Central 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10512560/ /pubmed/37730561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02151-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Beno, Anja Bertilsson, Monica Holmgren, Kristina Glise, Kristina Pousette, Anders Segerfelt, Karin Björk, Lisa Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title | Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02151-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benoanja doesemployerinvolvementinprimaryhealthcareenhancereturntoworkforpatientswithstressrelatedmentaldisordersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bertilssonmonica doesemployerinvolvementinprimaryhealthcareenhancereturntoworkforpatientswithstressrelatedmentaldisordersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT holmgrenkristina doesemployerinvolvementinprimaryhealthcareenhancereturntoworkforpatientswithstressrelatedmentaldisordersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT glisekristina doesemployerinvolvementinprimaryhealthcareenhancereturntoworkforpatientswithstressrelatedmentaldisordersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pousetteanders doesemployerinvolvementinprimaryhealthcareenhancereturntoworkforpatientswithstressrelatedmentaldisordersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT segerfeltkarin doesemployerinvolvementinprimaryhealthcareenhancereturntoworkforpatientswithstressrelatedmentaldisordersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bjorklisa doesemployerinvolvementinprimaryhealthcareenhancereturntoworkforpatientswithstressrelatedmentaldisordersaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |