Cargando…

Researching the future: scenarios to explore the future of human genome editing

BACKGROUND: Forward-looking, democratically oriented governance is needed to ensure that human genome editing serves rather than undercuts public values. Scientific, policy, and ethics communities have recognized this necessity but have demonstrated limited understanding of how to fulfill it. The fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Selin, Cynthia, Lambert, Lauren, Morain, Stephanie, Nelson, John P., Barlevy, Dorit, Farooque, Mahmud, Manley, Haley, Scott, Christopher T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37735670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00951-8
_version_ 1785108396124405760
author Selin, Cynthia
Lambert, Lauren
Morain, Stephanie
Nelson, John P.
Barlevy, Dorit
Farooque, Mahmud
Manley, Haley
Scott, Christopher T.
author_facet Selin, Cynthia
Lambert, Lauren
Morain, Stephanie
Nelson, John P.
Barlevy, Dorit
Farooque, Mahmud
Manley, Haley
Scott, Christopher T.
author_sort Selin, Cynthia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Forward-looking, democratically oriented governance is needed to ensure that human genome editing serves rather than undercuts public values. Scientific, policy, and ethics communities have recognized this necessity but have demonstrated limited understanding of how to fulfill it. The field of bioethics has long attempted to grapple with the unintended consequences of emerging technologies, but too often such foresight has lacked adequate scientific grounding, overemphasized regulation to the exclusion of examining underlying values, and failed to adequately engage the public. METHODS: This research investigates the application of scenario planning, a tool developed in the high-stakes, uncertainty-ridden world of corporate strategy, for the equally high-stakes and uncertain world of the governance of emerging technologies. The scenario planning methodology is non-predictive, looking instead at a spread of plausible futures which diverge in their implications for different communities’ needs, cares, and desires. RESULTS: In this article we share how the scenario development process can further understandings of the complex and dynamic systems which generate and shape new biomedical technologies and provide opportunities to re-examine and re-think questions of governance, ethics and values. We detail the results of a year-long scenario planning study that engaged experts from the biological sciences, bioethics, social sciences, law, policy, private industry, and civic organizations to articulate alternative futures of human genome editing. CONCLUSIONS: Through sharing and critiquing our methodological approach and results of this study, we advance understandings of anticipatory methods deployed in bioethics, demonstrating how this approach provides unique insights and helps to derive better research questions and policy strategies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-023-00951-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10512597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105125972023-09-22 Researching the future: scenarios to explore the future of human genome editing Selin, Cynthia Lambert, Lauren Morain, Stephanie Nelson, John P. Barlevy, Dorit Farooque, Mahmud Manley, Haley Scott, Christopher T. BMC Med Ethics Research BACKGROUND: Forward-looking, democratically oriented governance is needed to ensure that human genome editing serves rather than undercuts public values. Scientific, policy, and ethics communities have recognized this necessity but have demonstrated limited understanding of how to fulfill it. The field of bioethics has long attempted to grapple with the unintended consequences of emerging technologies, but too often such foresight has lacked adequate scientific grounding, overemphasized regulation to the exclusion of examining underlying values, and failed to adequately engage the public. METHODS: This research investigates the application of scenario planning, a tool developed in the high-stakes, uncertainty-ridden world of corporate strategy, for the equally high-stakes and uncertain world of the governance of emerging technologies. The scenario planning methodology is non-predictive, looking instead at a spread of plausible futures which diverge in their implications for different communities’ needs, cares, and desires. RESULTS: In this article we share how the scenario development process can further understandings of the complex and dynamic systems which generate and shape new biomedical technologies and provide opportunities to re-examine and re-think questions of governance, ethics and values. We detail the results of a year-long scenario planning study that engaged experts from the biological sciences, bioethics, social sciences, law, policy, private industry, and civic organizations to articulate alternative futures of human genome editing. CONCLUSIONS: Through sharing and critiquing our methodological approach and results of this study, we advance understandings of anticipatory methods deployed in bioethics, demonstrating how this approach provides unique insights and helps to derive better research questions and policy strategies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-023-00951-8. BioMed Central 2023-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10512597/ /pubmed/37735670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00951-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Selin, Cynthia
Lambert, Lauren
Morain, Stephanie
Nelson, John P.
Barlevy, Dorit
Farooque, Mahmud
Manley, Haley
Scott, Christopher T.
Researching the future: scenarios to explore the future of human genome editing
title Researching the future: scenarios to explore the future of human genome editing
title_full Researching the future: scenarios to explore the future of human genome editing
title_fullStr Researching the future: scenarios to explore the future of human genome editing
title_full_unstemmed Researching the future: scenarios to explore the future of human genome editing
title_short Researching the future: scenarios to explore the future of human genome editing
title_sort researching the future: scenarios to explore the future of human genome editing
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37735670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00951-8
work_keys_str_mv AT selincynthia researchingthefuturescenariostoexplorethefutureofhumangenomeediting
AT lambertlauren researchingthefuturescenariostoexplorethefutureofhumangenomeediting
AT morainstephanie researchingthefuturescenariostoexplorethefutureofhumangenomeediting
AT nelsonjohnp researchingthefuturescenariostoexplorethefutureofhumangenomeediting
AT barlevydorit researchingthefuturescenariostoexplorethefutureofhumangenomeediting
AT farooquemahmud researchingthefuturescenariostoexplorethefutureofhumangenomeediting
AT manleyhaley researchingthefuturescenariostoexplorethefutureofhumangenomeediting
AT scottchristophert researchingthefuturescenariostoexplorethefutureofhumangenomeediting