Cargando…

Manipulating the Fourier spectra of stimuli comprising a two-frame kinematogram to study early visual motion-detecting mechanisms: Perception versus short latency ocular-following responses

Two-frame kinematograms have been extensively used to study motion perception in human vision. Measurements of the direction-discrimination performance limits (D(max)) have been the primary subject of such studies, whereas surprisingly little research has asked how the variability in the spatial fre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheliga, Boris M., FitzGibbon, Edmond J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37725387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.10.11
_version_ 1785108496765681664
author Sheliga, Boris M.
FitzGibbon, Edmond J.
author_facet Sheliga, Boris M.
FitzGibbon, Edmond J.
author_sort Sheliga, Boris M.
collection PubMed
description Two-frame kinematograms have been extensively used to study motion perception in human vision. Measurements of the direction-discrimination performance limits (D(max)) have been the primary subject of such studies, whereas surprisingly little research has asked how the variability in the spatial frequency content of individual frames affects motion processing. Here, we used two-frame one-dimensional vertical pink noise kinematograms, in which images in both frames were bandpass filtered, with the central spatial frequency of the filter manipulated independently for each image. To avoid spatial aliasing, there was no actual leftward-rightward shift of the image: instead, the phases of all Fourier components of the second image were shifted by ±¼ wavelength with respect to those of the first. We recorded ocular-following responses (OFRs) and perceptual direction discrimination in human subjects. OFRs were in the direction of the Fourier components’ shift and showed a smooth decline in amplitude, well fit by Gaussian functions, as the difference between the central spatial frequencies of the first and second images increased. In sharp contrast, 100% correct perceptual direction-discrimination performance was observed when the difference between the central spatial frequencies of the first and second images was small, deteriorating rapidly to chance when increased further. Perceptual dependencies moved closer to the OFR ones when subjects were allowed to grade the strength of perceived motion. Response asymmetries common for perceptual judgments and the OFRs suggest that they rely on the same early visual processing mechanisms. The OFR data were quantitatively well described by a model which combined two factors: (1) an excitatory drive determined by a power law sum of stimulus Fourier components’ contributions, scaled by (2) a contrast normalization mechanism. Thus, in addition to traditional studies relying on perceptual reports, the OFRs represent a valuable behavioral tool for studying early motion processing on a fine scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10513114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105131142023-09-22 Manipulating the Fourier spectra of stimuli comprising a two-frame kinematogram to study early visual motion-detecting mechanisms: Perception versus short latency ocular-following responses Sheliga, Boris M. FitzGibbon, Edmond J. J Vis Article Two-frame kinematograms have been extensively used to study motion perception in human vision. Measurements of the direction-discrimination performance limits (D(max)) have been the primary subject of such studies, whereas surprisingly little research has asked how the variability in the spatial frequency content of individual frames affects motion processing. Here, we used two-frame one-dimensional vertical pink noise kinematograms, in which images in both frames were bandpass filtered, with the central spatial frequency of the filter manipulated independently for each image. To avoid spatial aliasing, there was no actual leftward-rightward shift of the image: instead, the phases of all Fourier components of the second image were shifted by ±¼ wavelength with respect to those of the first. We recorded ocular-following responses (OFRs) and perceptual direction discrimination in human subjects. OFRs were in the direction of the Fourier components’ shift and showed a smooth decline in amplitude, well fit by Gaussian functions, as the difference between the central spatial frequencies of the first and second images increased. In sharp contrast, 100% correct perceptual direction-discrimination performance was observed when the difference between the central spatial frequencies of the first and second images was small, deteriorating rapidly to chance when increased further. Perceptual dependencies moved closer to the OFR ones when subjects were allowed to grade the strength of perceived motion. Response asymmetries common for perceptual judgments and the OFRs suggest that they rely on the same early visual processing mechanisms. The OFR data were quantitatively well described by a model which combined two factors: (1) an excitatory drive determined by a power law sum of stimulus Fourier components’ contributions, scaled by (2) a contrast normalization mechanism. Thus, in addition to traditional studies relying on perceptual reports, the OFRs represent a valuable behavioral tool for studying early motion processing on a fine scale. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10513114/ /pubmed/37725387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.10.11 Text en Copyright 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Sheliga, Boris M.
FitzGibbon, Edmond J.
Manipulating the Fourier spectra of stimuli comprising a two-frame kinematogram to study early visual motion-detecting mechanisms: Perception versus short latency ocular-following responses
title Manipulating the Fourier spectra of stimuli comprising a two-frame kinematogram to study early visual motion-detecting mechanisms: Perception versus short latency ocular-following responses
title_full Manipulating the Fourier spectra of stimuli comprising a two-frame kinematogram to study early visual motion-detecting mechanisms: Perception versus short latency ocular-following responses
title_fullStr Manipulating the Fourier spectra of stimuli comprising a two-frame kinematogram to study early visual motion-detecting mechanisms: Perception versus short latency ocular-following responses
title_full_unstemmed Manipulating the Fourier spectra of stimuli comprising a two-frame kinematogram to study early visual motion-detecting mechanisms: Perception versus short latency ocular-following responses
title_short Manipulating the Fourier spectra of stimuli comprising a two-frame kinematogram to study early visual motion-detecting mechanisms: Perception versus short latency ocular-following responses
title_sort manipulating the fourier spectra of stimuli comprising a two-frame kinematogram to study early visual motion-detecting mechanisms: perception versus short latency ocular-following responses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37725387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.10.11
work_keys_str_mv AT sheligaborism manipulatingthefourierspectraofstimulicomprisingatwoframekinematogramtostudyearlyvisualmotiondetectingmechanismsperceptionversusshortlatencyocularfollowingresponses
AT fitzgibbonedmondj manipulatingthefourierspectraofstimulicomprisingatwoframekinematogramtostudyearlyvisualmotiondetectingmechanismsperceptionversusshortlatencyocularfollowingresponses