Cargando…

Novel Validated Five-point Photonumeric Scales for Assessment of Static and Dynamic Forehead Lines

BACKGROUND: The objective of this investigation was to create and validate five-point photonumeric scales which assess static and dynamic forehead lines. METHODS: Two different novel five-point photonumeric scales for the assessment of static and dynamic forehead lines were developed. Moreover, a ph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Tingsong, Kerscher, Martina, Ogilvie, Alexandra, Pavicic, Tatjana, Lorenc, Paul Z., Frank, Konstantin, Prinz, Valentina, Cajkovsky, Mia, Pooth, Rainer, Hernandez, Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37744770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005287
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The objective of this investigation was to create and validate five-point photonumeric scales which assess static and dynamic forehead lines. METHODS: Two different novel five-point photonumeric scales for the assessment of static and dynamic forehead lines were developed. Moreover, a photoguide was created, including subjects from both sexes, all age groups, and different Fitzpatrick skin types. A total of 11 raters from all over the world were involved in the digital validation, whereas four raters performed a live validation. RESULTS: The Croma Static Forehead Lines–Assessment Scale showed almost perfect inter and intra-rater agreement in both the digital and the live setting with inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82–0.89] in the first digital rating and 0.82 [95% CI: 0.78–0.86] in the second digital rating. The Croma Dynamic Forehead Lines–Assessment Scale showed almost perfect inter and intra-rater agreement in the digital setting with inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.83 [95% CI: 0.79–0.86] in the first digital rating and 0.80 [95% CI: 0.75–0.84] in the second rating and almost substantial agreement in the live setting. CONCLUSIONS: The Croma Static Forehead Lines–Assessment Scale and the Croma Dynamic Forehead Lines–Assessment Scale have excellent inter and intra-rater agreements to be justifiably used in the clinical and study setting, both digitally and live across ethnic groups.