Cargando…

Detection of Bacterial Colonization in Lung Transplant Recipients Using an Electronic Nose

BACKGROUND. Bacterial colonization (BC) of the lower airways is common in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) and increases the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Diagnosis often requires bronchoscopy. Exhaled breath analysis using electronic nose (eNose) technology may noninvasively detect B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wijbenga, Nynke, de Jong, Nadine L.A., Hoek, Rogier A.S., Mathot, Bas J., Seghers, Leonard, Aerts, Joachim G.J.V., Bos, Daniel, Manintveld, Olivier C., Hellemons, Merel E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001533
_version_ 1785108517719375872
author Wijbenga, Nynke
de Jong, Nadine L.A.
Hoek, Rogier A.S.
Mathot, Bas J.
Seghers, Leonard
Aerts, Joachim G.J.V.
Bos, Daniel
Manintveld, Olivier C.
Hellemons, Merel E.
author_facet Wijbenga, Nynke
de Jong, Nadine L.A.
Hoek, Rogier A.S.
Mathot, Bas J.
Seghers, Leonard
Aerts, Joachim G.J.V.
Bos, Daniel
Manintveld, Olivier C.
Hellemons, Merel E.
author_sort Wijbenga, Nynke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. Bacterial colonization (BC) of the lower airways is common in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) and increases the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Diagnosis often requires bronchoscopy. Exhaled breath analysis using electronic nose (eNose) technology may noninvasively detect BC in LTRs. Therefore, we aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of an eNose to detect BC in LTRs. METHODS. We performed a cross-sectional analysis within a prospective, single-center cohort study assessing the diagnostic accuracy of detecting BC using eNose technology in LTRs. In the outpatient clinic, consecutive LTR eNose measurements were collected. We assessed and classified the eNose measurements for the presence of BC. Using supervised machine learning, the diagnostic accuracy of eNose for BC was assessed in a random training and validation set. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS. In total, 161 LTRs were included with 80 exclusions because of various reasons. Of the remaining 81 patients, 16 (20%) were classified as BC and 65 (80%) as non-BC. eNose-based classification of patients with and without BC provided an area under the curve of 0.82 in the training set and 0.97 in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS. Exhaled breath analysis using eNose technology has the potential to noninvasively detect BC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10513211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105132112023-09-22 Detection of Bacterial Colonization in Lung Transplant Recipients Using an Electronic Nose Wijbenga, Nynke de Jong, Nadine L.A. Hoek, Rogier A.S. Mathot, Bas J. Seghers, Leonard Aerts, Joachim G.J.V. Bos, Daniel Manintveld, Olivier C. Hellemons, Merel E. Transplant Direct Lung Transplantation BACKGROUND. Bacterial colonization (BC) of the lower airways is common in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) and increases the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Diagnosis often requires bronchoscopy. Exhaled breath analysis using electronic nose (eNose) technology may noninvasively detect BC in LTRs. Therefore, we aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of an eNose to detect BC in LTRs. METHODS. We performed a cross-sectional analysis within a prospective, single-center cohort study assessing the diagnostic accuracy of detecting BC using eNose technology in LTRs. In the outpatient clinic, consecutive LTR eNose measurements were collected. We assessed and classified the eNose measurements for the presence of BC. Using supervised machine learning, the diagnostic accuracy of eNose for BC was assessed in a random training and validation set. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS. In total, 161 LTRs were included with 80 exclusions because of various reasons. Of the remaining 81 patients, 16 (20%) were classified as BC and 65 (80%) as non-BC. eNose-based classification of patients with and without BC provided an area under the curve of 0.82 in the training set and 0.97 in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS. Exhaled breath analysis using eNose technology has the potential to noninvasively detect BC. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10513211/ /pubmed/37745948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001533 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Lung Transplantation
Wijbenga, Nynke
de Jong, Nadine L.A.
Hoek, Rogier A.S.
Mathot, Bas J.
Seghers, Leonard
Aerts, Joachim G.J.V.
Bos, Daniel
Manintveld, Olivier C.
Hellemons, Merel E.
Detection of Bacterial Colonization in Lung Transplant Recipients Using an Electronic Nose
title Detection of Bacterial Colonization in Lung Transplant Recipients Using an Electronic Nose
title_full Detection of Bacterial Colonization in Lung Transplant Recipients Using an Electronic Nose
title_fullStr Detection of Bacterial Colonization in Lung Transplant Recipients Using an Electronic Nose
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Bacterial Colonization in Lung Transplant Recipients Using an Electronic Nose
title_short Detection of Bacterial Colonization in Lung Transplant Recipients Using an Electronic Nose
title_sort detection of bacterial colonization in lung transplant recipients using an electronic nose
topic Lung Transplantation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001533
work_keys_str_mv AT wijbenganynke detectionofbacterialcolonizationinlungtransplantrecipientsusinganelectronicnose
AT dejongnadinela detectionofbacterialcolonizationinlungtransplantrecipientsusinganelectronicnose
AT hoekrogieras detectionofbacterialcolonizationinlungtransplantrecipientsusinganelectronicnose
AT mathotbasj detectionofbacterialcolonizationinlungtransplantrecipientsusinganelectronicnose
AT seghersleonard detectionofbacterialcolonizationinlungtransplantrecipientsusinganelectronicnose
AT aertsjoachimgjv detectionofbacterialcolonizationinlungtransplantrecipientsusinganelectronicnose
AT bosdaniel detectionofbacterialcolonizationinlungtransplantrecipientsusinganelectronicnose
AT manintveldolivierc detectionofbacterialcolonizationinlungtransplantrecipientsusinganelectronicnose
AT hellemonsmerele detectionofbacterialcolonizationinlungtransplantrecipientsusinganelectronicnose