Cargando…

A two-step inverse solution for a single dipole cardiac source

Introduction: The inverse problem of electrocardiography noninvasively localizes the origin of undesired cardiac activity, such as a premature ventricular contraction (PVC), from potential recordings from multiple torso electrodes. However, the optimal number and placement of electrodes for an accur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ondrusova, Beata, Tino, Peter, Svehlikova, Jana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1264690
_version_ 1785108585450045440
author Ondrusova, Beata
Tino, Peter
Svehlikova, Jana
author_facet Ondrusova, Beata
Tino, Peter
Svehlikova, Jana
author_sort Ondrusova, Beata
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The inverse problem of electrocardiography noninvasively localizes the origin of undesired cardiac activity, such as a premature ventricular contraction (PVC), from potential recordings from multiple torso electrodes. However, the optimal number and placement of electrodes for an accurate solution of the inverse problem remain undetermined. This study presents a two-step inverse solution for a single dipole cardiac source, which investigates the significance of the torso electrodes on a patient-specific level. Furthermore, the impact of the significant electrodes on the accuracy of the inverse solution is studied. Methods: Body surface potential recordings from 128 electrodes of 13 patients with PVCs and their corresponding homogeneous and inhomogeneous torso models were used. The inverse problem using a single dipole was solved in two steps: First, using information from all electrodes, and second, using a subset of electrodes sorted in descending order according to their significance estimated by a greedy algorithm. The significance of electrodes was computed for three criteria derived from the singular values of the transfer matrix that correspond to the inversely estimated origin of the PVC computed in the first step. The localization error (LE) was computed as the Euclidean distance between the ground truth and the inversely estimated origin of the PVC. The LE obtained using the 32 and 64 most significant electrodes was compared to the LE obtained when all 128 electrodes were used for the inverse solution. Results: The average LE calculated for both torso models and using all 128 electrodes was 28.8 ± 11.9 mm. For the three tested criteria, the average LEs were 32.6 ± 19.9 mm, 29.6 ± 14.7 mm, and 28.8 ± 14.5 mm when 32 electrodes were used. When 64 electrodes were used, the average LEs were 30.1 ± 16.8 mm, 29.4 ± 12.0 mm, and 29.5 ± 12.6 mm. Conclusion: The study found inter-patient variability in the significance of torso electrodes and demonstrated that an accurate localization by the inverse solution with a single dipole could be achieved using a carefully selected reduced number of electrodes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10513503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105135032023-09-22 A two-step inverse solution for a single dipole cardiac source Ondrusova, Beata Tino, Peter Svehlikova, Jana Front Physiol Physiology Introduction: The inverse problem of electrocardiography noninvasively localizes the origin of undesired cardiac activity, such as a premature ventricular contraction (PVC), from potential recordings from multiple torso electrodes. However, the optimal number and placement of electrodes for an accurate solution of the inverse problem remain undetermined. This study presents a two-step inverse solution for a single dipole cardiac source, which investigates the significance of the torso electrodes on a patient-specific level. Furthermore, the impact of the significant electrodes on the accuracy of the inverse solution is studied. Methods: Body surface potential recordings from 128 electrodes of 13 patients with PVCs and their corresponding homogeneous and inhomogeneous torso models were used. The inverse problem using a single dipole was solved in two steps: First, using information from all electrodes, and second, using a subset of electrodes sorted in descending order according to their significance estimated by a greedy algorithm. The significance of electrodes was computed for three criteria derived from the singular values of the transfer matrix that correspond to the inversely estimated origin of the PVC computed in the first step. The localization error (LE) was computed as the Euclidean distance between the ground truth and the inversely estimated origin of the PVC. The LE obtained using the 32 and 64 most significant electrodes was compared to the LE obtained when all 128 electrodes were used for the inverse solution. Results: The average LE calculated for both torso models and using all 128 electrodes was 28.8 ± 11.9 mm. For the three tested criteria, the average LEs were 32.6 ± 19.9 mm, 29.6 ± 14.7 mm, and 28.8 ± 14.5 mm when 32 electrodes were used. When 64 electrodes were used, the average LEs were 30.1 ± 16.8 mm, 29.4 ± 12.0 mm, and 29.5 ± 12.6 mm. Conclusion: The study found inter-patient variability in the significance of torso electrodes and demonstrated that an accurate localization by the inverse solution with a single dipole could be achieved using a carefully selected reduced number of electrodes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10513503/ /pubmed/37745249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1264690 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ondrusova, Tino and Svehlikova. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Ondrusova, Beata
Tino, Peter
Svehlikova, Jana
A two-step inverse solution for a single dipole cardiac source
title A two-step inverse solution for a single dipole cardiac source
title_full A two-step inverse solution for a single dipole cardiac source
title_fullStr A two-step inverse solution for a single dipole cardiac source
title_full_unstemmed A two-step inverse solution for a single dipole cardiac source
title_short A two-step inverse solution for a single dipole cardiac source
title_sort two-step inverse solution for a single dipole cardiac source
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1264690
work_keys_str_mv AT ondrusovabeata atwostepinversesolutionforasingledipolecardiacsource
AT tinopeter atwostepinversesolutionforasingledipolecardiacsource
AT svehlikovajana atwostepinversesolutionforasingledipolecardiacsource
AT ondrusovabeata twostepinversesolutionforasingledipolecardiacsource
AT tinopeter twostepinversesolutionforasingledipolecardiacsource
AT svehlikovajana twostepinversesolutionforasingledipolecardiacsource