Cargando…

How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density

BACKGROUND: To develop a customized prostate biopsy indication using prostate health index density (PHID) combined with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and assess the reliability of the PHID cutoff value in external populations. METHODS: A total of 521 cognitive MRI/ultrasonograph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jae Yeon, Jeon, Seong Soo, Chung, Jae Hoon, Lee, Seung Soo, Park, Sung-Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2023.07.001
_version_ 1785108616041201664
author Kim, Jae Yeon
Jeon, Seong Soo
Chung, Jae Hoon
Lee, Seung Soo
Park, Sung-Woo
author_facet Kim, Jae Yeon
Jeon, Seong Soo
Chung, Jae Hoon
Lee, Seung Soo
Park, Sung-Woo
author_sort Kim, Jae Yeon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To develop a customized prostate biopsy indication using prostate health index density (PHID) combined with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and assess the reliability of the PHID cutoff value in external populations. METHODS: A total of 521 cognitive MRI/ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsies and biomarker tests for prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, and PHI were performed after mpMRI. The predictive value for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa; Gleason score≥7) of PSA derivatives was examined using the ROC curve. We developed a new biopsy indication utilizing a PHID cutoff based on the Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, which was externally validated. RESULTS: The combination of PHID and mpMRI (AUC = 0.884) demonstrated the highest predictive ability for csPCa, although PHID (AUC = 0.843) and PI-RADS (AUC = 0.806) individually also showed a high diagnostic value. When a PHID cutoff of 0.75 was used in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions, the negative predictive value of csPCa was 100%, and approximately half of the biopsies could be safely avoided. CONCLUSION: Compared to PHID or PI-RADS scores alone, the combination of PHID and PI-RADS scores increased the accuracy of csPCa detection and the number of cases in which biopsy could be avoided. In men with PI-RADS 3 lesions, the optimal PHID cutoff ≥0.75 can prevent half of the unnecessary biopsies without missing csPCa. In men with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions, biopsies are warranted regardless of PHID values because csPCa could be accompanied by low PHID.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10513902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Asian Pacific Prostate Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105139022023-09-23 How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density Kim, Jae Yeon Jeon, Seong Soo Chung, Jae Hoon Lee, Seung Soo Park, Sung-Woo Prostate Int Research Article BACKGROUND: To develop a customized prostate biopsy indication using prostate health index density (PHID) combined with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and assess the reliability of the PHID cutoff value in external populations. METHODS: A total of 521 cognitive MRI/ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsies and biomarker tests for prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, and PHI were performed after mpMRI. The predictive value for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa; Gleason score≥7) of PSA derivatives was examined using the ROC curve. We developed a new biopsy indication utilizing a PHID cutoff based on the Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, which was externally validated. RESULTS: The combination of PHID and mpMRI (AUC = 0.884) demonstrated the highest predictive ability for csPCa, although PHID (AUC = 0.843) and PI-RADS (AUC = 0.806) individually also showed a high diagnostic value. When a PHID cutoff of 0.75 was used in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions, the negative predictive value of csPCa was 100%, and approximately half of the biopsies could be safely avoided. CONCLUSION: Compared to PHID or PI-RADS scores alone, the combination of PHID and PI-RADS scores increased the accuracy of csPCa detection and the number of cases in which biopsy could be avoided. In men with PI-RADS 3 lesions, the optimal PHID cutoff ≥0.75 can prevent half of the unnecessary biopsies without missing csPCa. In men with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions, biopsies are warranted regardless of PHID values because csPCa could be accompanied by low PHID. Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2023-09 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10513902/ /pubmed/37745905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2023.07.001 Text en © 2023 The Asian Pacific Prostate Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Jae Yeon
Jeon, Seong Soo
Chung, Jae Hoon
Lee, Seung Soo
Park, Sung-Woo
How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density
title How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density
title_full How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density
title_fullStr How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density
title_full_unstemmed How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density
title_short How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density
title_sort how to avoid prostate biopsy in men with prostate image-reporting and data system 3 lesion? development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2023.07.001
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjaeyeon howtoavoidprostatebiopsyinmenwithprostateimagereportinganddatasystem3lesiondevelopmentandexternalvalidationofnewbiopsyindicationusingprostatehealthindexdensity
AT jeonseongsoo howtoavoidprostatebiopsyinmenwithprostateimagereportinganddatasystem3lesiondevelopmentandexternalvalidationofnewbiopsyindicationusingprostatehealthindexdensity
AT chungjaehoon howtoavoidprostatebiopsyinmenwithprostateimagereportinganddatasystem3lesiondevelopmentandexternalvalidationofnewbiopsyindicationusingprostatehealthindexdensity
AT leeseungsoo howtoavoidprostatebiopsyinmenwithprostateimagereportinganddatasystem3lesiondevelopmentandexternalvalidationofnewbiopsyindicationusingprostatehealthindexdensity
AT parksungwoo howtoavoidprostatebiopsyinmenwithprostateimagereportinganddatasystem3lesiondevelopmentandexternalvalidationofnewbiopsyindicationusingprostatehealthindexdensity