Cargando…
How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density
BACKGROUND: To develop a customized prostate biopsy indication using prostate health index density (PHID) combined with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and assess the reliability of the PHID cutoff value in external populations. METHODS: A total of 521 cognitive MRI/ultrasonograph...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian Pacific Prostate Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2023.07.001 |
_version_ | 1785108616041201664 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jae Yeon Jeon, Seong Soo Chung, Jae Hoon Lee, Seung Soo Park, Sung-Woo |
author_facet | Kim, Jae Yeon Jeon, Seong Soo Chung, Jae Hoon Lee, Seung Soo Park, Sung-Woo |
author_sort | Kim, Jae Yeon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To develop a customized prostate biopsy indication using prostate health index density (PHID) combined with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and assess the reliability of the PHID cutoff value in external populations. METHODS: A total of 521 cognitive MRI/ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsies and biomarker tests for prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, and PHI were performed after mpMRI. The predictive value for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa; Gleason score≥7) of PSA derivatives was examined using the ROC curve. We developed a new biopsy indication utilizing a PHID cutoff based on the Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, which was externally validated. RESULTS: The combination of PHID and mpMRI (AUC = 0.884) demonstrated the highest predictive ability for csPCa, although PHID (AUC = 0.843) and PI-RADS (AUC = 0.806) individually also showed a high diagnostic value. When a PHID cutoff of 0.75 was used in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions, the negative predictive value of csPCa was 100%, and approximately half of the biopsies could be safely avoided. CONCLUSION: Compared to PHID or PI-RADS scores alone, the combination of PHID and PI-RADS scores increased the accuracy of csPCa detection and the number of cases in which biopsy could be avoided. In men with PI-RADS 3 lesions, the optimal PHID cutoff ≥0.75 can prevent half of the unnecessary biopsies without missing csPCa. In men with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions, biopsies are warranted regardless of PHID values because csPCa could be accompanied by low PHID. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10513902 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Asian Pacific Prostate Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105139022023-09-23 How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density Kim, Jae Yeon Jeon, Seong Soo Chung, Jae Hoon Lee, Seung Soo Park, Sung-Woo Prostate Int Research Article BACKGROUND: To develop a customized prostate biopsy indication using prostate health index density (PHID) combined with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and assess the reliability of the PHID cutoff value in external populations. METHODS: A total of 521 cognitive MRI/ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsies and biomarker tests for prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, and PHI were performed after mpMRI. The predictive value for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa; Gleason score≥7) of PSA derivatives was examined using the ROC curve. We developed a new biopsy indication utilizing a PHID cutoff based on the Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, which was externally validated. RESULTS: The combination of PHID and mpMRI (AUC = 0.884) demonstrated the highest predictive ability for csPCa, although PHID (AUC = 0.843) and PI-RADS (AUC = 0.806) individually also showed a high diagnostic value. When a PHID cutoff of 0.75 was used in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions, the negative predictive value of csPCa was 100%, and approximately half of the biopsies could be safely avoided. CONCLUSION: Compared to PHID or PI-RADS scores alone, the combination of PHID and PI-RADS scores increased the accuracy of csPCa detection and the number of cases in which biopsy could be avoided. In men with PI-RADS 3 lesions, the optimal PHID cutoff ≥0.75 can prevent half of the unnecessary biopsies without missing csPCa. In men with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions, biopsies are warranted regardless of PHID values because csPCa could be accompanied by low PHID. Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2023-09 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10513902/ /pubmed/37745905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2023.07.001 Text en © 2023 The Asian Pacific Prostate Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kim, Jae Yeon Jeon, Seong Soo Chung, Jae Hoon Lee, Seung Soo Park, Sung-Woo How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density |
title | How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density |
title_full | How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density |
title_fullStr | How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density |
title_full_unstemmed | How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density |
title_short | How to avoid prostate biopsy in men with Prostate Image-Reporting and Data System 3 lesion? Development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density |
title_sort | how to avoid prostate biopsy in men with prostate image-reporting and data system 3 lesion? development and external validation of new biopsy indication using prostate health index density |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2023.07.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjaeyeon howtoavoidprostatebiopsyinmenwithprostateimagereportinganddatasystem3lesiondevelopmentandexternalvalidationofnewbiopsyindicationusingprostatehealthindexdensity AT jeonseongsoo howtoavoidprostatebiopsyinmenwithprostateimagereportinganddatasystem3lesiondevelopmentandexternalvalidationofnewbiopsyindicationusingprostatehealthindexdensity AT chungjaehoon howtoavoidprostatebiopsyinmenwithprostateimagereportinganddatasystem3lesiondevelopmentandexternalvalidationofnewbiopsyindicationusingprostatehealthindexdensity AT leeseungsoo howtoavoidprostatebiopsyinmenwithprostateimagereportinganddatasystem3lesiondevelopmentandexternalvalidationofnewbiopsyindicationusingprostatehealthindexdensity AT parksungwoo howtoavoidprostatebiopsyinmenwithprostateimagereportinganddatasystem3lesiondevelopmentandexternalvalidationofnewbiopsyindicationusingprostatehealthindexdensity |