Cargando…

Menopausal stage differences in endothelial resistance to ischemia‐reperfusion injury

BACKGROUND: In postmenopausal women, reduced ovarian function precedes endothelial dysfunction and attenuated endothelial resistance to ischemia‐reperfusion (IR) injury. We hypothesized that IR injury would lower endothelial function, with premenopausal women demonstrating the greatest protection fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delgado Spicuzza, Jocelyn M., Proctor, David N., Thijssen, Dick H. J., Somani, Yasina B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37734868
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15768
_version_ 1785108617323610112
author Delgado Spicuzza, Jocelyn M.
Proctor, David N.
Thijssen, Dick H. J.
Somani, Yasina B.
author_facet Delgado Spicuzza, Jocelyn M.
Proctor, David N.
Thijssen, Dick H. J.
Somani, Yasina B.
author_sort Delgado Spicuzza, Jocelyn M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In postmenopausal women, reduced ovarian function precedes endothelial dysfunction and attenuated endothelial resistance to ischemia‐reperfusion (IR) injury. We hypothesized that IR injury would lower endothelial function, with premenopausal women demonstrating the greatest protection from injury, followed by early, then late postmenopausal women. METHODS: Flow‐mediated dilation (FMD) was assessed at baseline and following IR injury in premenopausal (n = 11), early (n = 11; 4 ± 1.6 years since menopause), and late (n = 11; 15 ± 5.5 years since menopause) postmenopausal women. RESULTS: There were significant group differences in baseline FMD (p = 0.007); post hoc analysis revealed a similar resting FMD between premenopausal (7.8% ± 2.1%) and early postmenopausal (7.1% ± 2.7%), but significantly lower FMD in late postmenopausal women (4.5% ± 2.3%). Results showed an overall decline in FMD after IR injury (p < 0.001), and a significant condition*time interaction (p = 0.048), with early postmenopausal women demonstrating the most significant decline in FMD following IR. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that endothelial resistance to IR injury is attenuated in healthy early postmenopausal women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10513907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105139072023-09-23 Menopausal stage differences in endothelial resistance to ischemia‐reperfusion injury Delgado Spicuzza, Jocelyn M. Proctor, David N. Thijssen, Dick H. J. Somani, Yasina B. Physiol Rep Original Articles BACKGROUND: In postmenopausal women, reduced ovarian function precedes endothelial dysfunction and attenuated endothelial resistance to ischemia‐reperfusion (IR) injury. We hypothesized that IR injury would lower endothelial function, with premenopausal women demonstrating the greatest protection from injury, followed by early, then late postmenopausal women. METHODS: Flow‐mediated dilation (FMD) was assessed at baseline and following IR injury in premenopausal (n = 11), early (n = 11; 4 ± 1.6 years since menopause), and late (n = 11; 15 ± 5.5 years since menopause) postmenopausal women. RESULTS: There were significant group differences in baseline FMD (p = 0.007); post hoc analysis revealed a similar resting FMD between premenopausal (7.8% ± 2.1%) and early postmenopausal (7.1% ± 2.7%), but significantly lower FMD in late postmenopausal women (4.5% ± 2.3%). Results showed an overall decline in FMD after IR injury (p < 0.001), and a significant condition*time interaction (p = 0.048), with early postmenopausal women demonstrating the most significant decline in FMD following IR. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that endothelial resistance to IR injury is attenuated in healthy early postmenopausal women. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10513907/ /pubmed/37734868 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15768 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Delgado Spicuzza, Jocelyn M.
Proctor, David N.
Thijssen, Dick H. J.
Somani, Yasina B.
Menopausal stage differences in endothelial resistance to ischemia‐reperfusion injury
title Menopausal stage differences in endothelial resistance to ischemia‐reperfusion injury
title_full Menopausal stage differences in endothelial resistance to ischemia‐reperfusion injury
title_fullStr Menopausal stage differences in endothelial resistance to ischemia‐reperfusion injury
title_full_unstemmed Menopausal stage differences in endothelial resistance to ischemia‐reperfusion injury
title_short Menopausal stage differences in endothelial resistance to ischemia‐reperfusion injury
title_sort menopausal stage differences in endothelial resistance to ischemia‐reperfusion injury
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37734868
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15768
work_keys_str_mv AT delgadospicuzzajocelynm menopausalstagedifferencesinendothelialresistancetoischemiareperfusioninjury
AT proctordavidn menopausalstagedifferencesinendothelialresistancetoischemiareperfusioninjury
AT thijssendickhj menopausalstagedifferencesinendothelialresistancetoischemiareperfusioninjury
AT somaniyasinab menopausalstagedifferencesinendothelialresistancetoischemiareperfusioninjury