Cargando…

Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes

Limitation in exercise capacity has not been described in athletes affected by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. However, patients who have recovered from COVID‐19 without cardiopulmonary impairment show exaggerated ventilatory response during exercise. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ventilatory efficiency...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Komici, Klara, Bencivenga, Leonardo, Rengo, Giuseppe, Bianco, Andrea, Guerra, Germano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37734918
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15795
_version_ 1785108617782886400
author Komici, Klara
Bencivenga, Leonardo
Rengo, Giuseppe
Bianco, Andrea
Guerra, Germano
author_facet Komici, Klara
Bencivenga, Leonardo
Rengo, Giuseppe
Bianco, Andrea
Guerra, Germano
author_sort Komici, Klara
collection PubMed
description Limitation in exercise capacity has not been described in athletes affected by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. However, patients who have recovered from COVID‐19 without cardiopulmonary impairment show exaggerated ventilatory response during exercise. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ventilatory efficiency (VEf) in competitive athletes recovered from COVID‐19 and to characterize the ventilation versus carbon dioxide relationship (VE/VCO(2)) slope in this population. Thirty‐seven competitive athletes with COVID‐19 were recruited for this study. All participants underwent spirometry, echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). z‐FVC values and end‐title pressure of CO(2) (P(ET)CO(2)) were lower in the third tertile compared with the first tertile: −0.753 ± 0.473 vs. 0.037 ± 0.911, p = 0.05; 42.2 ± 2.7 vs. 37.1 ± 2.5 mmHg, p < 0.01. VE/VCO(2) slope was significantly correlated to maximal VCO(2)/VE and maximal VO(2)/VE: coefficient = −0.5 R (2) = 0.58, p < 0.0001 and coefficient = −0.3 R (2) = 0.16, p = 0.008. Competitive athletes affected by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, without cardio‐respiratory disease sequel, may present ventilatory inefficiency (ViE), without exercise capacity limitation. FVC is higher in athletes with better ventilatory performance during exercise, and increased VE/VCO(2) slope is inversely correlated to max VCO(2)/VE and max VO(2)/VE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10513909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105139092023-09-23 Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes Komici, Klara Bencivenga, Leonardo Rengo, Giuseppe Bianco, Andrea Guerra, Germano Physiol Rep Original Articles Limitation in exercise capacity has not been described in athletes affected by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. However, patients who have recovered from COVID‐19 without cardiopulmonary impairment show exaggerated ventilatory response during exercise. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ventilatory efficiency (VEf) in competitive athletes recovered from COVID‐19 and to characterize the ventilation versus carbon dioxide relationship (VE/VCO(2)) slope in this population. Thirty‐seven competitive athletes with COVID‐19 were recruited for this study. All participants underwent spirometry, echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). z‐FVC values and end‐title pressure of CO(2) (P(ET)CO(2)) were lower in the third tertile compared with the first tertile: −0.753 ± 0.473 vs. 0.037 ± 0.911, p = 0.05; 42.2 ± 2.7 vs. 37.1 ± 2.5 mmHg, p < 0.01. VE/VCO(2) slope was significantly correlated to maximal VCO(2)/VE and maximal VO(2)/VE: coefficient = −0.5 R (2) = 0.58, p < 0.0001 and coefficient = −0.3 R (2) = 0.16, p = 0.008. Competitive athletes affected by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, without cardio‐respiratory disease sequel, may present ventilatory inefficiency (ViE), without exercise capacity limitation. FVC is higher in athletes with better ventilatory performance during exercise, and increased VE/VCO(2) slope is inversely correlated to max VCO(2)/VE and max VO(2)/VE. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10513909/ /pubmed/37734918 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15795 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Komici, Klara
Bencivenga, Leonardo
Rengo, Giuseppe
Bianco, Andrea
Guerra, Germano
Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes
title Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes
title_full Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes
title_fullStr Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes
title_full_unstemmed Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes
title_short Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes
title_sort ventilatory efficiency in post‐covid‐19 athletes
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37734918
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15795
work_keys_str_mv AT komiciklara ventilatoryefficiencyinpostcovid19athletes
AT bencivengaleonardo ventilatoryefficiencyinpostcovid19athletes
AT rengogiuseppe ventilatoryefficiencyinpostcovid19athletes
AT biancoandrea ventilatoryefficiencyinpostcovid19athletes
AT guerragermano ventilatoryefficiencyinpostcovid19athletes