Cargando…
Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes
Limitation in exercise capacity has not been described in athletes affected by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. However, patients who have recovered from COVID‐19 without cardiopulmonary impairment show exaggerated ventilatory response during exercise. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ventilatory efficiency...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37734918 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15795 |
_version_ | 1785108617782886400 |
---|---|
author | Komici, Klara Bencivenga, Leonardo Rengo, Giuseppe Bianco, Andrea Guerra, Germano |
author_facet | Komici, Klara Bencivenga, Leonardo Rengo, Giuseppe Bianco, Andrea Guerra, Germano |
author_sort | Komici, Klara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Limitation in exercise capacity has not been described in athletes affected by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. However, patients who have recovered from COVID‐19 without cardiopulmonary impairment show exaggerated ventilatory response during exercise. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ventilatory efficiency (VEf) in competitive athletes recovered from COVID‐19 and to characterize the ventilation versus carbon dioxide relationship (VE/VCO(2)) slope in this population. Thirty‐seven competitive athletes with COVID‐19 were recruited for this study. All participants underwent spirometry, echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). z‐FVC values and end‐title pressure of CO(2) (P(ET)CO(2)) were lower in the third tertile compared with the first tertile: −0.753 ± 0.473 vs. 0.037 ± 0.911, p = 0.05; 42.2 ± 2.7 vs. 37.1 ± 2.5 mmHg, p < 0.01. VE/VCO(2) slope was significantly correlated to maximal VCO(2)/VE and maximal VO(2)/VE: coefficient = −0.5 R (2) = 0.58, p < 0.0001 and coefficient = −0.3 R (2) = 0.16, p = 0.008. Competitive athletes affected by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, without cardio‐respiratory disease sequel, may present ventilatory inefficiency (ViE), without exercise capacity limitation. FVC is higher in athletes with better ventilatory performance during exercise, and increased VE/VCO(2) slope is inversely correlated to max VCO(2)/VE and max VO(2)/VE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10513909 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105139092023-09-23 Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes Komici, Klara Bencivenga, Leonardo Rengo, Giuseppe Bianco, Andrea Guerra, Germano Physiol Rep Original Articles Limitation in exercise capacity has not been described in athletes affected by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. However, patients who have recovered from COVID‐19 without cardiopulmonary impairment show exaggerated ventilatory response during exercise. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ventilatory efficiency (VEf) in competitive athletes recovered from COVID‐19 and to characterize the ventilation versus carbon dioxide relationship (VE/VCO(2)) slope in this population. Thirty‐seven competitive athletes with COVID‐19 were recruited for this study. All participants underwent spirometry, echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). z‐FVC values and end‐title pressure of CO(2) (P(ET)CO(2)) were lower in the third tertile compared with the first tertile: −0.753 ± 0.473 vs. 0.037 ± 0.911, p = 0.05; 42.2 ± 2.7 vs. 37.1 ± 2.5 mmHg, p < 0.01. VE/VCO(2) slope was significantly correlated to maximal VCO(2)/VE and maximal VO(2)/VE: coefficient = −0.5 R (2) = 0.58, p < 0.0001 and coefficient = −0.3 R (2) = 0.16, p = 0.008. Competitive athletes affected by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, without cardio‐respiratory disease sequel, may present ventilatory inefficiency (ViE), without exercise capacity limitation. FVC is higher in athletes with better ventilatory performance during exercise, and increased VE/VCO(2) slope is inversely correlated to max VCO(2)/VE and max VO(2)/VE. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10513909/ /pubmed/37734918 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15795 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Komici, Klara Bencivenga, Leonardo Rengo, Giuseppe Bianco, Andrea Guerra, Germano Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes |
title | Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes |
title_full | Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes |
title_fullStr | Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes |
title_full_unstemmed | Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes |
title_short | Ventilatory efficiency in post‐COVID‐19 athletes |
title_sort | ventilatory efficiency in post‐covid‐19 athletes |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37734918 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15795 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT komiciklara ventilatoryefficiencyinpostcovid19athletes AT bencivengaleonardo ventilatoryefficiencyinpostcovid19athletes AT rengogiuseppe ventilatoryefficiencyinpostcovid19athletes AT biancoandrea ventilatoryefficiencyinpostcovid19athletes AT guerragermano ventilatoryefficiencyinpostcovid19athletes |