Cargando…
Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
BACKGROUND: Esophageal thermal injury is a complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, and it can be avoided by esophageal deviation during left atrial posterior wall radiofrequency catheter ablation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety of a nitinol-based mechanical esophageal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37744938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.07.010 |
_version_ | 1785108620323586048 |
---|---|
author | Pereira, Renner Pisani, Cristiano Aiello, Vera Cestari, Idágene Oyama, Helena Santos, Osmar Otubo, Jorge Moura, Daniel Scanavacca, Mauricio |
author_facet | Pereira, Renner Pisani, Cristiano Aiello, Vera Cestari, Idágene Oyama, Helena Santos, Osmar Otubo, Jorge Moura, Daniel Scanavacca, Mauricio |
author_sort | Pereira, Renner |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Esophageal thermal injury is a complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, and it can be avoided by esophageal deviation during left atrial posterior wall radiofrequency catheter ablation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety of a nitinol-based mechanical esophageal displacement device (MEDD) and its performance. METHODS: This preclinical safety study was conducted on 20 pigs, with 10 undergoing radiofrequency AF ablation using the MEDD and 10 serving as a control group under anticoagulation but without radiofrequency application. Esophageal traumatic injuries were classified from 0 to 4 and were grouped as absent (grade 0), minor (grade 1 or 2), moderate (grade 3), or major risk lesions (grade 4) by anatomopathological study. Grades 1 and 2 were considered acceptable. Fluoroscopy was used to measure displacement. RESULTS: Five (25%) pigs developed traumatic lesions, 4 with grade 1 and 1 with grade 2 (2-mm superficial ulcer). There was no difference in lesion occurrence between the radiofrequency and control groups (30% and 20%, respectively; P = .43). Under rightward displacement, the right edge moved 23.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 21.3–26.3) mm and the left edge moved 16.3 (IQR 13.8–18.4) mm (P < .001) from baseline. Under leftward displacement, the right edge moved 13.5 (IQR 10.9–15.3) mm and the left edge moved 16.5 (IQR 12.3–18.5) mm (P = .07). A perforation to the pharyngeal diverticulum occurred in 1 pig, related to an accidental extubation. CONCLUSION: In pigs, the MEDD demonstrated safety in relation to esophageal tissue, and successful deviation. Esophageal traumatic injuries were acceptable, but improper manipulation led to pharyngeal lesion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10513920 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105139202023-09-23 Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation Pereira, Renner Pisani, Cristiano Aiello, Vera Cestari, Idágene Oyama, Helena Santos, Osmar Otubo, Jorge Moura, Daniel Scanavacca, Mauricio Heart Rhythm O2 Experimental BACKGROUND: Esophageal thermal injury is a complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, and it can be avoided by esophageal deviation during left atrial posterior wall radiofrequency catheter ablation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety of a nitinol-based mechanical esophageal displacement device (MEDD) and its performance. METHODS: This preclinical safety study was conducted on 20 pigs, with 10 undergoing radiofrequency AF ablation using the MEDD and 10 serving as a control group under anticoagulation but without radiofrequency application. Esophageal traumatic injuries were classified from 0 to 4 and were grouped as absent (grade 0), minor (grade 1 or 2), moderate (grade 3), or major risk lesions (grade 4) by anatomopathological study. Grades 1 and 2 were considered acceptable. Fluoroscopy was used to measure displacement. RESULTS: Five (25%) pigs developed traumatic lesions, 4 with grade 1 and 1 with grade 2 (2-mm superficial ulcer). There was no difference in lesion occurrence between the radiofrequency and control groups (30% and 20%, respectively; P = .43). Under rightward displacement, the right edge moved 23.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 21.3–26.3) mm and the left edge moved 16.3 (IQR 13.8–18.4) mm (P < .001) from baseline. Under leftward displacement, the right edge moved 13.5 (IQR 10.9–15.3) mm and the left edge moved 16.5 (IQR 12.3–18.5) mm (P = .07). A perforation to the pharyngeal diverticulum occurred in 1 pig, related to an accidental extubation. CONCLUSION: In pigs, the MEDD demonstrated safety in relation to esophageal tissue, and successful deviation. Esophageal traumatic injuries were acceptable, but improper manipulation led to pharyngeal lesion. Elsevier 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10513920/ /pubmed/37744938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.07.010 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Experimental Pereira, Renner Pisani, Cristiano Aiello, Vera Cestari, Idágene Oyama, Helena Santos, Osmar Otubo, Jorge Moura, Daniel Scanavacca, Mauricio Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation |
title | Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation |
title_full | Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation |
title_fullStr | Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation |
title_short | Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation |
title_sort | safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation |
topic | Experimental |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37744938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.07.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pereirarenner safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation AT pisanicristiano safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation AT aiellovera safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation AT cestariidagene safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation AT oyamahelena safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation AT santososmar safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation AT otubojorge safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation AT mouradaniel safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation AT scanavaccamauricio safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation |