Cargando…

Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

BACKGROUND: Esophageal thermal injury is a complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, and it can be avoided by esophageal deviation during left atrial posterior wall radiofrequency catheter ablation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety of a nitinol-based mechanical esophageal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pereira, Renner, Pisani, Cristiano, Aiello, Vera, Cestari, Idágene, Oyama, Helena, Santos, Osmar, Otubo, Jorge, Moura, Daniel, Scanavacca, Mauricio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37744938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.07.010
_version_ 1785108620323586048
author Pereira, Renner
Pisani, Cristiano
Aiello, Vera
Cestari, Idágene
Oyama, Helena
Santos, Osmar
Otubo, Jorge
Moura, Daniel
Scanavacca, Mauricio
author_facet Pereira, Renner
Pisani, Cristiano
Aiello, Vera
Cestari, Idágene
Oyama, Helena
Santos, Osmar
Otubo, Jorge
Moura, Daniel
Scanavacca, Mauricio
author_sort Pereira, Renner
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Esophageal thermal injury is a complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, and it can be avoided by esophageal deviation during left atrial posterior wall radiofrequency catheter ablation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety of a nitinol-based mechanical esophageal displacement device (MEDD) and its performance. METHODS: This preclinical safety study was conducted on 20 pigs, with 10 undergoing radiofrequency AF ablation using the MEDD and 10 serving as a control group under anticoagulation but without radiofrequency application. Esophageal traumatic injuries were classified from 0 to 4 and were grouped as absent (grade 0), minor (grade 1 or 2), moderate (grade 3), or major risk lesions (grade 4) by anatomopathological study. Grades 1 and 2 were considered acceptable. Fluoroscopy was used to measure displacement. RESULTS: Five (25%) pigs developed traumatic lesions, 4 with grade 1 and 1 with grade 2 (2-mm superficial ulcer). There was no difference in lesion occurrence between the radiofrequency and control groups (30% and 20%, respectively; P = .43). Under rightward displacement, the right edge moved 23.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 21.3–26.3) mm and the left edge moved 16.3 (IQR 13.8–18.4) mm (P < .001) from baseline. Under leftward displacement, the right edge moved 13.5 (IQR 10.9–15.3) mm and the left edge moved 16.5 (IQR 12.3–18.5) mm (P = .07). A perforation to the pharyngeal diverticulum occurred in 1 pig, related to an accidental extubation. CONCLUSION: In pigs, the MEDD demonstrated safety in relation to esophageal tissue, and successful deviation. Esophageal traumatic injuries were acceptable, but improper manipulation led to pharyngeal lesion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10513920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105139202023-09-23 Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation Pereira, Renner Pisani, Cristiano Aiello, Vera Cestari, Idágene Oyama, Helena Santos, Osmar Otubo, Jorge Moura, Daniel Scanavacca, Mauricio Heart Rhythm O2 Experimental BACKGROUND: Esophageal thermal injury is a complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, and it can be avoided by esophageal deviation during left atrial posterior wall radiofrequency catheter ablation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety of a nitinol-based mechanical esophageal displacement device (MEDD) and its performance. METHODS: This preclinical safety study was conducted on 20 pigs, with 10 undergoing radiofrequency AF ablation using the MEDD and 10 serving as a control group under anticoagulation but without radiofrequency application. Esophageal traumatic injuries were classified from 0 to 4 and were grouped as absent (grade 0), minor (grade 1 or 2), moderate (grade 3), or major risk lesions (grade 4) by anatomopathological study. Grades 1 and 2 were considered acceptable. Fluoroscopy was used to measure displacement. RESULTS: Five (25%) pigs developed traumatic lesions, 4 with grade 1 and 1 with grade 2 (2-mm superficial ulcer). There was no difference in lesion occurrence between the radiofrequency and control groups (30% and 20%, respectively; P = .43). Under rightward displacement, the right edge moved 23.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 21.3–26.3) mm and the left edge moved 16.3 (IQR 13.8–18.4) mm (P < .001) from baseline. Under leftward displacement, the right edge moved 13.5 (IQR 10.9–15.3) mm and the left edge moved 16.5 (IQR 12.3–18.5) mm (P = .07). A perforation to the pharyngeal diverticulum occurred in 1 pig, related to an accidental extubation. CONCLUSION: In pigs, the MEDD demonstrated safety in relation to esophageal tissue, and successful deviation. Esophageal traumatic injuries were acceptable, but improper manipulation led to pharyngeal lesion. Elsevier 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10513920/ /pubmed/37744938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.07.010 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Experimental
Pereira, Renner
Pisani, Cristiano
Aiello, Vera
Cestari, Idágene
Oyama, Helena
Santos, Osmar
Otubo, Jorge
Moura, Daniel
Scanavacca, Mauricio
Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
title Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
title_full Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
title_fullStr Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
title_full_unstemmed Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
title_short Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
title_sort safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
topic Experimental
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37744938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.07.010
work_keys_str_mv AT pereirarenner safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation
AT pisanicristiano safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation
AT aiellovera safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation
AT cestariidagene safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation
AT oyamahelena safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation
AT santososmar safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation
AT otubojorge safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation
AT mouradaniel safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation
AT scanavaccamauricio safetyofanesophagealdeviatorforatrialfibrillationcatheterablation