Cargando…
Histopathological Analysis of Nodal Disease After Chemoradiation Reveals Viable Tumor Cells as the most Important Prognostic Factor in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
BACKGROUND: In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), salvage neck dissection (ND) is required after primary chemoradiation in case of residual nodal disease. Upon histopathological examination, viability of tumor cells is assessed but little is known about other prognostic histopathological...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37195519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12105-023-01557-7 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), salvage neck dissection (ND) is required after primary chemoradiation in case of residual nodal disease. Upon histopathological examination, viability of tumor cells is assessed but little is known about other prognostic histopathological features. In particular, the presence of swirled keratin debris and its prognostic value is controversial. The aim of this study is to examine histopathological parameters in ND specimens and correlate them with patient outcome to determine the relevant parameters for histopathological reporting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Salvage ND specimen from a cohort of n = 75 HNSCC (oropharynx, larynx, hypopharynx) patients with prior (chemo) radiation were evaluated on H&E stains for the following parameters: viable tumor cells, necrosis, swirled keratin debris, foamy histiocytes, bleeding residues, fibrosis, elastosis, pyknotic cells, calcification, cholesterol crystals, multinucleated giant cells, perineural, and vascular invasion. Histological features were correlated with survival outcomes. RESULTS: Only the presence / amount (area) of viable tumor cells correlated with a worse clinical outcome (local and regional recurrence-free survival, (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival, p < 0.05) in both the univariable and multivariable analyses. CONCLUSION: We could confirm the presence of viable tumor cells as a relevant negative prognostic factor after (chemo) radiation. The amount (area) of viable tumor cells further substratified patients with worse LRRFS. None of the other parameters correlated with a distinctive worse outcome. Importantly, the presence of (swirled) keratin debris alone should not be considered viable tumor cells (ypN0). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12105-023-01557-7. |
---|