Cargando…
Survival prediction and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer after curative surgery: insights from cox regression and neural networks
Medical research frequently relies on Cox regression to analyze the survival distribution of cancer patients. Nonetheless, in specific scenarios, neural networks hold the potential to serve as a robust alternative. In this study, we aim to scrutinize the effectiveness of Cox regression and neural ne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37735621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42926-0 |
_version_ | 1785108665207881728 |
---|---|
author | Alinia, Shayeste Asghari-Jafarabadi, Mohammad Mahmoudi, Leila Norouzi, Solmaz Safari, Maliheh Roshanaei, Ghodratollah |
author_facet | Alinia, Shayeste Asghari-Jafarabadi, Mohammad Mahmoudi, Leila Norouzi, Solmaz Safari, Maliheh Roshanaei, Ghodratollah |
author_sort | Alinia, Shayeste |
collection | PubMed |
description | Medical research frequently relies on Cox regression to analyze the survival distribution of cancer patients. Nonetheless, in specific scenarios, neural networks hold the potential to serve as a robust alternative. In this study, we aim to scrutinize the effectiveness of Cox regression and neural network models in assessing the survival outcomes of patients who have undergone treatment for colorectal cancer. We conducted a retrospective study on 284 colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgery at Imam Khomeini clinic in Hamadan between 2001 and 2017. The data was used to train both Cox regression and neural network models, and their predictive accuracy was compared using diagnostic measures such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, accuracy, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The analyses were performed using STATA 17 and R4.0.4 software. The study revealed that the best neural network model had a sensitivity of 74.5% (95% CI 61.0–85.0), specificity of 83.3% (65.3–94.4), positive predictive value of 89.1% (76.4–96.4), negative predictive value of 64.1% (47.2–78.8), AUC of 0.79 (0.70–0.88), and accuracy of 0.776 for death prediction. For recurrence, the best neural network model had a sensitivity of 88.1% (74.4–96.0%), specificity of 83.7% (69.3–93.2%), positive predictive value of 84.1% (69.9–93.4%), negative predictive value of 87.8% (73.8–95.9%), AUC of 0.86 (0.78–0.93), and accuracy of 0.859. The Cox model had comparable results, with a sensitivity of 73.6% (64.8–81.2) and 85.5% (78.3–91.0), specificity of 89.6% (83.8–93.8) and 98.0% (94.4–99.6), positive predictive value of 84.0% (75.6–90.4) and 97.4% (92.6–99.5), negative predictive value of 82.0% (75.6–90.4) and 88.8% (0.83–93.1), AUC of 0.82 (0.77–0.86) and 0.92 (0.89–0.95), and accuracy of 0.88 and 0.92 for death and recurrence prediction, respectively. In conclusion, the study found that both Cox regression and neural network models are effective in predicting early recurrence and death in patients with colorectal cancer after curative surgery. The neural network model showed slightly better sensitivity and negative predictive value for death, while the Cox model had better specificity and positive predictive value for recurrence. Overall, both models demonstrated high accuracy and AUC, indicating their usefulness in predicting these outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10514146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105141462023-09-23 Survival prediction and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer after curative surgery: insights from cox regression and neural networks Alinia, Shayeste Asghari-Jafarabadi, Mohammad Mahmoudi, Leila Norouzi, Solmaz Safari, Maliheh Roshanaei, Ghodratollah Sci Rep Article Medical research frequently relies on Cox regression to analyze the survival distribution of cancer patients. Nonetheless, in specific scenarios, neural networks hold the potential to serve as a robust alternative. In this study, we aim to scrutinize the effectiveness of Cox regression and neural network models in assessing the survival outcomes of patients who have undergone treatment for colorectal cancer. We conducted a retrospective study on 284 colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgery at Imam Khomeini clinic in Hamadan between 2001 and 2017. The data was used to train both Cox regression and neural network models, and their predictive accuracy was compared using diagnostic measures such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, accuracy, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The analyses were performed using STATA 17 and R4.0.4 software. The study revealed that the best neural network model had a sensitivity of 74.5% (95% CI 61.0–85.0), specificity of 83.3% (65.3–94.4), positive predictive value of 89.1% (76.4–96.4), negative predictive value of 64.1% (47.2–78.8), AUC of 0.79 (0.70–0.88), and accuracy of 0.776 for death prediction. For recurrence, the best neural network model had a sensitivity of 88.1% (74.4–96.0%), specificity of 83.7% (69.3–93.2%), positive predictive value of 84.1% (69.9–93.4%), negative predictive value of 87.8% (73.8–95.9%), AUC of 0.86 (0.78–0.93), and accuracy of 0.859. The Cox model had comparable results, with a sensitivity of 73.6% (64.8–81.2) and 85.5% (78.3–91.0), specificity of 89.6% (83.8–93.8) and 98.0% (94.4–99.6), positive predictive value of 84.0% (75.6–90.4) and 97.4% (92.6–99.5), negative predictive value of 82.0% (75.6–90.4) and 88.8% (0.83–93.1), AUC of 0.82 (0.77–0.86) and 0.92 (0.89–0.95), and accuracy of 0.88 and 0.92 for death and recurrence prediction, respectively. In conclusion, the study found that both Cox regression and neural network models are effective in predicting early recurrence and death in patients with colorectal cancer after curative surgery. The neural network model showed slightly better sensitivity and negative predictive value for death, while the Cox model had better specificity and positive predictive value for recurrence. Overall, both models demonstrated high accuracy and AUC, indicating their usefulness in predicting these outcomes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10514146/ /pubmed/37735621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42926-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Alinia, Shayeste Asghari-Jafarabadi, Mohammad Mahmoudi, Leila Norouzi, Solmaz Safari, Maliheh Roshanaei, Ghodratollah Survival prediction and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer after curative surgery: insights from cox regression and neural networks |
title | Survival prediction and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer after curative surgery: insights from cox regression and neural networks |
title_full | Survival prediction and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer after curative surgery: insights from cox regression and neural networks |
title_fullStr | Survival prediction and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer after curative surgery: insights from cox regression and neural networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival prediction and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer after curative surgery: insights from cox regression and neural networks |
title_short | Survival prediction and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer after curative surgery: insights from cox regression and neural networks |
title_sort | survival prediction and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer after curative surgery: insights from cox regression and neural networks |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37735621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42926-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aliniashayeste survivalpredictionandprognosticfactorsincolorectalcanceraftercurativesurgeryinsightsfromcoxregressionandneuralnetworks AT asgharijafarabadimohammad survivalpredictionandprognosticfactorsincolorectalcanceraftercurativesurgeryinsightsfromcoxregressionandneuralnetworks AT mahmoudileila survivalpredictionandprognosticfactorsincolorectalcanceraftercurativesurgeryinsightsfromcoxregressionandneuralnetworks AT norouzisolmaz survivalpredictionandprognosticfactorsincolorectalcanceraftercurativesurgeryinsightsfromcoxregressionandneuralnetworks AT safarimaliheh survivalpredictionandprognosticfactorsincolorectalcanceraftercurativesurgeryinsightsfromcoxregressionandneuralnetworks AT roshanaeighodratollah survivalpredictionandprognosticfactorsincolorectalcanceraftercurativesurgeryinsightsfromcoxregressionandneuralnetworks |