Cargando…
Bat STING drives IFN-beta production in anti-RNA virus innate immune response
The ability of stimulator of interferon genes (STING) to activate interferon (IFN) responses during RNA virus infection has been demonstrated in different mammalian cells. Despite being the host of numerous RNA viruses, the role of STING in bats during RNA virus infection has not been elucidated. In...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37744905 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1232314 |
_version_ | 1785108739441819648 |
---|---|
author | Fu, Feiyu Shao, Qi Zhang, Jianjian Wang, Jie Wang, Zhaofei Ma, Jingjiao Yan, Yaxian Sun, Jianhe Cheng, Yuqiang |
author_facet | Fu, Feiyu Shao, Qi Zhang, Jianjian Wang, Jie Wang, Zhaofei Ma, Jingjiao Yan, Yaxian Sun, Jianhe Cheng, Yuqiang |
author_sort | Fu, Feiyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ability of stimulator of interferon genes (STING) to activate interferon (IFN) responses during RNA virus infection has been demonstrated in different mammalian cells. Despite being the host of numerous RNA viruses, the role of STING in bats during RNA virus infection has not been elucidated. In this study, we identified and cloned the STING gene of the Brazilian free-tailed bat Tadarida brasiliensis (T. brasiliensis) and tested its ability to induce IFN-β by overexpressing and knocking down bat STING (BatSTING) in T. brasiliensis 1 lung (TB1 Lu) cells. In addition, we used green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) VSV-GFP as a model to detect the antiviral activity of BatSTING. The results showed that overexpression of STING in TB1 Lu cells stimulated by cGAS significantly inhibited RNA virus replication, and the antiviral activities were associated with its ability to regulate basal expression of IFN-β and some IFN stimulated genes (ISGs). We also found that BatSTING was able to be activated after stimulation by diverse RNA viruses. The results of TB1 Lu cells with STING deficiency showed that knockdown of BatSTING severely hindered the IFN-β response triggered by VSV-GFP. Based on this, we confirm that BatSTING is required to induce IFN-β expression during RNA virus infection. In conclusion, our experimental data clearly show that STING in bat hosts plays an irreplaceable role in mediating IFN-β responses and anti-RNA virus infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10514486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105144862023-09-23 Bat STING drives IFN-beta production in anti-RNA virus innate immune response Fu, Feiyu Shao, Qi Zhang, Jianjian Wang, Jie Wang, Zhaofei Ma, Jingjiao Yan, Yaxian Sun, Jianhe Cheng, Yuqiang Front Microbiol Microbiology The ability of stimulator of interferon genes (STING) to activate interferon (IFN) responses during RNA virus infection has been demonstrated in different mammalian cells. Despite being the host of numerous RNA viruses, the role of STING in bats during RNA virus infection has not been elucidated. In this study, we identified and cloned the STING gene of the Brazilian free-tailed bat Tadarida brasiliensis (T. brasiliensis) and tested its ability to induce IFN-β by overexpressing and knocking down bat STING (BatSTING) in T. brasiliensis 1 lung (TB1 Lu) cells. In addition, we used green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) VSV-GFP as a model to detect the antiviral activity of BatSTING. The results showed that overexpression of STING in TB1 Lu cells stimulated by cGAS significantly inhibited RNA virus replication, and the antiviral activities were associated with its ability to regulate basal expression of IFN-β and some IFN stimulated genes (ISGs). We also found that BatSTING was able to be activated after stimulation by diverse RNA viruses. The results of TB1 Lu cells with STING deficiency showed that knockdown of BatSTING severely hindered the IFN-β response triggered by VSV-GFP. Based on this, we confirm that BatSTING is required to induce IFN-β expression during RNA virus infection. In conclusion, our experimental data clearly show that STING in bat hosts plays an irreplaceable role in mediating IFN-β responses and anti-RNA virus infection. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10514486/ /pubmed/37744905 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1232314 Text en Copyright © 2023 Fu, Shao, Zhang, Wang, Wang, Ma, Yan, Sun and Cheng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Fu, Feiyu Shao, Qi Zhang, Jianjian Wang, Jie Wang, Zhaofei Ma, Jingjiao Yan, Yaxian Sun, Jianhe Cheng, Yuqiang Bat STING drives IFN-beta production in anti-RNA virus innate immune response |
title | Bat STING drives IFN-beta production in anti-RNA virus innate immune response |
title_full | Bat STING drives IFN-beta production in anti-RNA virus innate immune response |
title_fullStr | Bat STING drives IFN-beta production in anti-RNA virus innate immune response |
title_full_unstemmed | Bat STING drives IFN-beta production in anti-RNA virus innate immune response |
title_short | Bat STING drives IFN-beta production in anti-RNA virus innate immune response |
title_sort | bat sting drives ifn-beta production in anti-rna virus innate immune response |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37744905 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1232314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fufeiyu batstingdrivesifnbetaproductioninantirnavirusinnateimmuneresponse AT shaoqi batstingdrivesifnbetaproductioninantirnavirusinnateimmuneresponse AT zhangjianjian batstingdrivesifnbetaproductioninantirnavirusinnateimmuneresponse AT wangjie batstingdrivesifnbetaproductioninantirnavirusinnateimmuneresponse AT wangzhaofei batstingdrivesifnbetaproductioninantirnavirusinnateimmuneresponse AT majingjiao batstingdrivesifnbetaproductioninantirnavirusinnateimmuneresponse AT yanyaxian batstingdrivesifnbetaproductioninantirnavirusinnateimmuneresponse AT sunjianhe batstingdrivesifnbetaproductioninantirnavirusinnateimmuneresponse AT chengyuqiang batstingdrivesifnbetaproductioninantirnavirusinnateimmuneresponse |