Cargando…

Young people’s opinions of cancer care in England: the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort

OBJECTIVES: The BRIGHTLIGHT cohort study was the national evaluation of cancer services for teenager and young adults (TYA). This was analysis of free-text survey data to better understand their experiences of cancer care. DESIGN: Cohort study SETTING: National Health Service hospitals delivering ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Luke, Fern, Lorna A, Whelan, Jeremy S, Taylor, Rachel M, Study Group, BRIGHTLIGHT
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069910
_version_ 1785108766096621568
author Hughes, Luke
Fern, Lorna A
Whelan, Jeremy S
Taylor, Rachel M
Study Group, BRIGHTLIGHT
author_facet Hughes, Luke
Fern, Lorna A
Whelan, Jeremy S
Taylor, Rachel M
Study Group, BRIGHTLIGHT
author_sort Hughes, Luke
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The BRIGHTLIGHT cohort study was the national evaluation of cancer services for teenager and young adults (TYA). This was analysis of free-text survey data to better understand their experiences of cancer care. DESIGN: Cohort study SETTING: National Health Service hospitals delivering cancer care in England PARTICIPANTS: 830 young people newly diagnosed with cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Exposure to specialist care in the first 6 months after diagnosis defined as care in a TYA Principal Treatment Centre (PTC). This was categorised as follows: all care in a TYA-PTC (ALL-TYA-PTC), no care in a TYA-PTC (NO-TYA-PTC) so care delivered in a children/adult unit only and some care in a TYA-PTC with additional care in a children’s/adult unit (SOME-TYA-PTC). PRIMARY OUTCOME: Data were collected through the BRIGHTLIGHT survey included free-text questions which asked patients ‘what was the best aspects of their experiences of care’ and ‘what aspects could be improved’. These comments were analysed using content analysis. Themes were compared between categories of care, then ranked in order of frequency, ranging from the most endorsed to the least. RESULTS: Overall, young people were most positive about their healthcare team, while the area highlighted for improvement was diagnostic experience. Differences between the three groups suggested those who had some or all treatment in a TYA-PTC valued the place of care. Regardless of where TYA were treated their healthcare teams were favourably viewed. Age appropriate place of care was highlighted to be of value for those in PTCs. CONCLUSIONS: These data show the value young people placed on the care they received in TYA specific wards. Young people who accessed some or all of their care in a TYA-PTC highly endorsed their place of care as one of the best elements of their care, and it is further emphasised by those who had shared care who experienced difficulty with lack of age-appropriate care when treated outside the TYA-PTC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10514633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105146332023-09-23 Young people’s opinions of cancer care in England: the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort Hughes, Luke Fern, Lorna A Whelan, Jeremy S Taylor, Rachel M Study Group, BRIGHTLIGHT BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVES: The BRIGHTLIGHT cohort study was the national evaluation of cancer services for teenager and young adults (TYA). This was analysis of free-text survey data to better understand their experiences of cancer care. DESIGN: Cohort study SETTING: National Health Service hospitals delivering cancer care in England PARTICIPANTS: 830 young people newly diagnosed with cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Exposure to specialist care in the first 6 months after diagnosis defined as care in a TYA Principal Treatment Centre (PTC). This was categorised as follows: all care in a TYA-PTC (ALL-TYA-PTC), no care in a TYA-PTC (NO-TYA-PTC) so care delivered in a children/adult unit only and some care in a TYA-PTC with additional care in a children’s/adult unit (SOME-TYA-PTC). PRIMARY OUTCOME: Data were collected through the BRIGHTLIGHT survey included free-text questions which asked patients ‘what was the best aspects of their experiences of care’ and ‘what aspects could be improved’. These comments were analysed using content analysis. Themes were compared between categories of care, then ranked in order of frequency, ranging from the most endorsed to the least. RESULTS: Overall, young people were most positive about their healthcare team, while the area highlighted for improvement was diagnostic experience. Differences between the three groups suggested those who had some or all treatment in a TYA-PTC valued the place of care. Regardless of where TYA were treated their healthcare teams were favourably viewed. Age appropriate place of care was highlighted to be of value for those in PTCs. CONCLUSIONS: These data show the value young people placed on the care they received in TYA specific wards. Young people who accessed some or all of their care in a TYA-PTC highly endorsed their place of care as one of the best elements of their care, and it is further emphasised by those who had shared care who experienced difficulty with lack of age-appropriate care when treated outside the TYA-PTC. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10514633/ /pubmed/37730384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069910 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Oncology
Hughes, Luke
Fern, Lorna A
Whelan, Jeremy S
Taylor, Rachel M
Study Group, BRIGHTLIGHT
Young people’s opinions of cancer care in England: the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort
title Young people’s opinions of cancer care in England: the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort
title_full Young people’s opinions of cancer care in England: the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort
title_fullStr Young people’s opinions of cancer care in England: the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort
title_full_unstemmed Young people’s opinions of cancer care in England: the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort
title_short Young people’s opinions of cancer care in England: the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort
title_sort young people’s opinions of cancer care in england: the brightlight cohort
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069910
work_keys_str_mv AT hughesluke youngpeoplesopinionsofcancercareinenglandthebrightlightcohort
AT fernlornaa youngpeoplesopinionsofcancercareinenglandthebrightlightcohort
AT whelanjeremys youngpeoplesopinionsofcancercareinenglandthebrightlightcohort
AT taylorrachelm youngpeoplesopinionsofcancercareinenglandthebrightlightcohort
AT studygroupbrightlight youngpeoplesopinionsofcancercareinenglandthebrightlightcohort