Cargando…

Automated cervical cell segmentation using deep ensemble learning

BACKGROUND: Cervical cell segmentation is a fundamental step in automated cervical cancer cytology screening. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a deep ensemble model for cervical cell segmentation including both cytoplasm and nucleus segmentation. METHODS: The Cx22 dataset was used t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ji, Jie, Zhang, Weifeng, Dong, Yuejiao, Lin, Ruilin, Geng, Yiqun, Hong, Liangli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37735354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01096-1
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Cervical cell segmentation is a fundamental step in automated cervical cancer cytology screening. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a deep ensemble model for cervical cell segmentation including both cytoplasm and nucleus segmentation. METHODS: The Cx22 dataset was used to develop the automated cervical cell segmentation algorithm. The U-Net, U-Net +  + , DeepLabV3, DeepLabV3Plus, Transunet, and Segformer were used as candidate model architectures, and each of the first four architectures adopted two different encoders choosing from resnet34, resnet50 and denseNet121. Models were trained under two settings: trained from scratch, encoders initialized from ImageNet pre-trained models and then all layers were fine-tuned. For every segmentation task, four models were chosen as base models, and Unweighted average was adopted as the model ensemble method. RESULTS: U-Net and U-Net +  + with resnet34 and denseNet121 encoders trained using transfer learning consistently performed better than other models, so they were chosen as base models. The ensemble model obtained the Dice similarity coefficient, sensitivity, specificity of 0.9535 (95% CI:0.9534–0.9536), 0.9621 (0.9619–0.9622),0.9835 (0.9834–0.9836) and 0.7863 (0.7851–0.7876), 0.9581 (0.9573–0.959), 0.9961 (0.9961–0.9962) on cytoplasm segmentation and nucleus segmentation, respectively. The Dice, sensitivity, specificity of baseline models for cytoplasm segmentation and nucleus segmentation were 0.948, 0.954, 0.9823 and 0.750, 0.713, 0.9988, respectively. Except for the specificity of cytoplasm segmentation, all metrics outperformed the best baseline models (P < 0.05) with a moderate margin. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm achieved better performances on cervical cell segmentation than baseline models. It can be potentially used in automated cervical cancer cytology screening system. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-023-01096-1.