Cargando…
Restrictive versus conventional ward fluid therapy in non-cardiac surgery patients and the effect on postoperative complications: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Diligent fluid management is an instrumental part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. However, the effect of a ward regimen to limit intravenous fluid administration on outcome remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis investigating the effect of a restrictive versus a conventional f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37735433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-023-00337-9 |
_version_ | 1785108848442343424 |
---|---|
author | Bosboom, Joachim J. Wijnberge, Marije Geerts, Bart F. Kerstens, Martijn Mythen, Michael G. Vlaar, Alexander P. J. Hollmann, Markus W. Veelo, Denise P. |
author_facet | Bosboom, Joachim J. Wijnberge, Marije Geerts, Bart F. Kerstens, Martijn Mythen, Michael G. Vlaar, Alexander P. J. Hollmann, Markus W. Veelo, Denise P. |
author_sort | Bosboom, Joachim J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diligent fluid management is an instrumental part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. However, the effect of a ward regimen to limit intravenous fluid administration on outcome remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis investigating the effect of a restrictive versus a conventional fluid regimen on complications in patients after non-cardiac surgery in the postoperative period on the clinical ward. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases, from the start of indexing until June 2022, with constraints for English language and adult human study participants. Data were combined using classic methods of meta-analyses and were expressed as weighted pooled risk ratio (RR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Quality assessment and risk of bias analyses was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Seven records, three randomized controlled trials, and four non-randomized studies were included with a total of 883 patients. A restrictive fluid regimen was associated with a reduction in overall complication rate in the RCTs (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.95; P < .03; I(2) = 35%). This reduction in overall complication rate was not consistent in the non-randomized studies (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.03; P 0.07; I(2) = 45%). No significant association was found for mortality using a restrictive fluid regimen (RCTs OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.05 to 4.90; P = 0.56; I(2) = 0%, non-randomized studies OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.46; P = 0.14; I(2) = 0%). A restrictive fluid regimen is significantly associated with a reduction in postoperative length of stay in the non-randomized studies (MD − 1.81 days, 95% CI − 3.27 to − 0.35; P = 0.01; I(2) = 0%) but not in the RCTs (MD 0.60 days, 95% CI − 0.75 to 1.95; P = 0.38). Risk of bias was moderate to high. Methodological quality was very low to moderate. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests restrictive fluid therapy on the ward may be associated with an effect on postoperative complication rate. However, the quality of evidence was moderate to low, the sample size was small, and the data came from both RCTs and non-randomized studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13741-023-00337-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10514989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105149892023-09-23 Restrictive versus conventional ward fluid therapy in non-cardiac surgery patients and the effect on postoperative complications: a meta-analysis Bosboom, Joachim J. Wijnberge, Marije Geerts, Bart F. Kerstens, Martijn Mythen, Michael G. Vlaar, Alexander P. J. Hollmann, Markus W. Veelo, Denise P. Perioper Med (Lond) Review BACKGROUND: Diligent fluid management is an instrumental part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. However, the effect of a ward regimen to limit intravenous fluid administration on outcome remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis investigating the effect of a restrictive versus a conventional fluid regimen on complications in patients after non-cardiac surgery in the postoperative period on the clinical ward. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases, from the start of indexing until June 2022, with constraints for English language and adult human study participants. Data were combined using classic methods of meta-analyses and were expressed as weighted pooled risk ratio (RR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Quality assessment and risk of bias analyses was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Seven records, three randomized controlled trials, and four non-randomized studies were included with a total of 883 patients. A restrictive fluid regimen was associated with a reduction in overall complication rate in the RCTs (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.95; P < .03; I(2) = 35%). This reduction in overall complication rate was not consistent in the non-randomized studies (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.03; P 0.07; I(2) = 45%). No significant association was found for mortality using a restrictive fluid regimen (RCTs OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.05 to 4.90; P = 0.56; I(2) = 0%, non-randomized studies OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.46; P = 0.14; I(2) = 0%). A restrictive fluid regimen is significantly associated with a reduction in postoperative length of stay in the non-randomized studies (MD − 1.81 days, 95% CI − 3.27 to − 0.35; P = 0.01; I(2) = 0%) but not in the RCTs (MD 0.60 days, 95% CI − 0.75 to 1.95; P = 0.38). Risk of bias was moderate to high. Methodological quality was very low to moderate. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests restrictive fluid therapy on the ward may be associated with an effect on postoperative complication rate. However, the quality of evidence was moderate to low, the sample size was small, and the data came from both RCTs and non-randomized studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13741-023-00337-9. BioMed Central 2023-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10514989/ /pubmed/37735433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-023-00337-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Bosboom, Joachim J. Wijnberge, Marije Geerts, Bart F. Kerstens, Martijn Mythen, Michael G. Vlaar, Alexander P. J. Hollmann, Markus W. Veelo, Denise P. Restrictive versus conventional ward fluid therapy in non-cardiac surgery patients and the effect on postoperative complications: a meta-analysis |
title | Restrictive versus conventional ward fluid therapy in non-cardiac surgery patients and the effect on postoperative complications: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Restrictive versus conventional ward fluid therapy in non-cardiac surgery patients and the effect on postoperative complications: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Restrictive versus conventional ward fluid therapy in non-cardiac surgery patients and the effect on postoperative complications: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Restrictive versus conventional ward fluid therapy in non-cardiac surgery patients and the effect on postoperative complications: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Restrictive versus conventional ward fluid therapy in non-cardiac surgery patients and the effect on postoperative complications: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | restrictive versus conventional ward fluid therapy in non-cardiac surgery patients and the effect on postoperative complications: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37735433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-023-00337-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bosboomjoachimj restrictiveversusconventionalwardfluidtherapyinnoncardiacsurgerypatientsandtheeffectonpostoperativecomplicationsametaanalysis AT wijnbergemarije restrictiveversusconventionalwardfluidtherapyinnoncardiacsurgerypatientsandtheeffectonpostoperativecomplicationsametaanalysis AT geertsbartf restrictiveversusconventionalwardfluidtherapyinnoncardiacsurgerypatientsandtheeffectonpostoperativecomplicationsametaanalysis AT kerstensmartijn restrictiveversusconventionalwardfluidtherapyinnoncardiacsurgerypatientsandtheeffectonpostoperativecomplicationsametaanalysis AT mythenmichaelg restrictiveversusconventionalwardfluidtherapyinnoncardiacsurgerypatientsandtheeffectonpostoperativecomplicationsametaanalysis AT vlaaralexanderpj restrictiveversusconventionalwardfluidtherapyinnoncardiacsurgerypatientsandtheeffectonpostoperativecomplicationsametaanalysis AT hollmannmarkusw restrictiveversusconventionalwardfluidtherapyinnoncardiacsurgerypatientsandtheeffectonpostoperativecomplicationsametaanalysis AT veelodenisep restrictiveversusconventionalwardfluidtherapyinnoncardiacsurgerypatientsandtheeffectonpostoperativecomplicationsametaanalysis |