Cargando…

The assessment of caregiver self-efficacy in a virtual eating disorder setting

BACKGROUND: Caregiver self-efficacy is thought to be a key component for successful family-based treatment (FBT) for individuals with eating disorders. As such, interventions aimed at enhancing caregiver self-efficacy, often measured via the Parents Versus Anorexia scale, have been a focal point of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Nickolas M., Baker, Jessica H., Urban, Bek, Freestone, David, Doyle, Angela Celio, Bohon, Cara, Steinberg, Dori M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37737181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00869-x
_version_ 1785108944998367232
author Jones, Nickolas M.
Baker, Jessica H.
Urban, Bek
Freestone, David
Doyle, Angela Celio
Bohon, Cara
Steinberg, Dori M.
author_facet Jones, Nickolas M.
Baker, Jessica H.
Urban, Bek
Freestone, David
Doyle, Angela Celio
Bohon, Cara
Steinberg, Dori M.
author_sort Jones, Nickolas M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caregiver self-efficacy is thought to be a key component for successful family-based treatment (FBT) for individuals with eating disorders. As such, interventions aimed at enhancing caregiver self-efficacy, often measured via the Parents Versus Anorexia scale, have been a focal point of FBT literature. However, studies looking at the relationship between caregiver self-efficacy and treatment outcomes have been mixed. We aimed to better understand the influence of caregiver self-efficacy on eating disorder treatment outcomes during FBT. METHODS: Caregiver self-efficacy was measured using the Parents Versus Eating Disorders (PVED) scale, an adapted version of the Parents Versus Anorexia scale, in a sample of 1051 patients with an eating disorder and 1528 caregivers (patients can have more than one caregiver) receiving virtual FBT. Across two multilevel models, we tested how caregiver self-efficacy changed over time and its association with changes in eating disorder symptoms and weight over the first 16 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Over treatment, PVED scores increased (b = 0.79, SE = 0.04, CI [0.72, 0.86]) and starting PVED scores were predictive of improved eating disorder symptoms (b = − 0.73, SE = 0.22, CI [− 1.15, − 0.30]), but not weight (b = − 0.96, SE = 0.59, CI [− 2.10, 0.19]). We also found that PVED change-from-baseline scores were predictive of weight (b = − 0.48, SE = 0.03, CI [− 0.53, − 0.43]) such that patient weight was lower when caregiver reports of PVED were higher. Likewise, the association between caregiver change in PVED scores and weight varied as a function of treatment time (b = 0.27, SE = 0.01, CI [0.24, 0.29]). Results were consistent when isolating patients with anorexia nervosa. CONCLUSIONS: Caregiver self-efficacy during FBT improved over time but was not robustly associated with treatment outcomes. This may, in part, be due to psychometric properties of the PVED scale. We describe these issues and illustrate the need for development of a new measure of self-efficacy for caregivers supporting their loved ones through eating disorder treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10515423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105154232023-09-23 The assessment of caregiver self-efficacy in a virtual eating disorder setting Jones, Nickolas M. Baker, Jessica H. Urban, Bek Freestone, David Doyle, Angela Celio Bohon, Cara Steinberg, Dori M. J Eat Disord Research BACKGROUND: Caregiver self-efficacy is thought to be a key component for successful family-based treatment (FBT) for individuals with eating disorders. As such, interventions aimed at enhancing caregiver self-efficacy, often measured via the Parents Versus Anorexia scale, have been a focal point of FBT literature. However, studies looking at the relationship between caregiver self-efficacy and treatment outcomes have been mixed. We aimed to better understand the influence of caregiver self-efficacy on eating disorder treatment outcomes during FBT. METHODS: Caregiver self-efficacy was measured using the Parents Versus Eating Disorders (PVED) scale, an adapted version of the Parents Versus Anorexia scale, in a sample of 1051 patients with an eating disorder and 1528 caregivers (patients can have more than one caregiver) receiving virtual FBT. Across two multilevel models, we tested how caregiver self-efficacy changed over time and its association with changes in eating disorder symptoms and weight over the first 16 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Over treatment, PVED scores increased (b = 0.79, SE = 0.04, CI [0.72, 0.86]) and starting PVED scores were predictive of improved eating disorder symptoms (b = − 0.73, SE = 0.22, CI [− 1.15, − 0.30]), but not weight (b = − 0.96, SE = 0.59, CI [− 2.10, 0.19]). We also found that PVED change-from-baseline scores were predictive of weight (b = − 0.48, SE = 0.03, CI [− 0.53, − 0.43]) such that patient weight was lower when caregiver reports of PVED were higher. Likewise, the association between caregiver change in PVED scores and weight varied as a function of treatment time (b = 0.27, SE = 0.01, CI [0.24, 0.29]). Results were consistent when isolating patients with anorexia nervosa. CONCLUSIONS: Caregiver self-efficacy during FBT improved over time but was not robustly associated with treatment outcomes. This may, in part, be due to psychometric properties of the PVED scale. We describe these issues and illustrate the need for development of a new measure of self-efficacy for caregivers supporting their loved ones through eating disorder treatment. BioMed Central 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10515423/ /pubmed/37737181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00869-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jones, Nickolas M.
Baker, Jessica H.
Urban, Bek
Freestone, David
Doyle, Angela Celio
Bohon, Cara
Steinberg, Dori M.
The assessment of caregiver self-efficacy in a virtual eating disorder setting
title The assessment of caregiver self-efficacy in a virtual eating disorder setting
title_full The assessment of caregiver self-efficacy in a virtual eating disorder setting
title_fullStr The assessment of caregiver self-efficacy in a virtual eating disorder setting
title_full_unstemmed The assessment of caregiver self-efficacy in a virtual eating disorder setting
title_short The assessment of caregiver self-efficacy in a virtual eating disorder setting
title_sort assessment of caregiver self-efficacy in a virtual eating disorder setting
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37737181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00869-x
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesnickolasm theassessmentofcaregiverselfefficacyinavirtualeatingdisordersetting
AT bakerjessicah theassessmentofcaregiverselfefficacyinavirtualeatingdisordersetting
AT urbanbek theassessmentofcaregiverselfefficacyinavirtualeatingdisordersetting
AT freestonedavid theassessmentofcaregiverselfefficacyinavirtualeatingdisordersetting
AT doyleangelacelio theassessmentofcaregiverselfefficacyinavirtualeatingdisordersetting
AT bohoncara theassessmentofcaregiverselfefficacyinavirtualeatingdisordersetting
AT steinbergdorim theassessmentofcaregiverselfefficacyinavirtualeatingdisordersetting
AT jonesnickolasm assessmentofcaregiverselfefficacyinavirtualeatingdisordersetting
AT bakerjessicah assessmentofcaregiverselfefficacyinavirtualeatingdisordersetting
AT urbanbek assessmentofcaregiverselfefficacyinavirtualeatingdisordersetting
AT freestonedavid assessmentofcaregiverselfefficacyinavirtualeatingdisordersetting
AT doyleangelacelio assessmentofcaregiverselfefficacyinavirtualeatingdisordersetting
AT bohoncara assessmentofcaregiverselfefficacyinavirtualeatingdisordersetting
AT steinbergdorim assessmentofcaregiverselfefficacyinavirtualeatingdisordersetting