Cargando…

Biomechanical effects of S1 sacroiliac screws versus S2 sacroiliac screws on sacroiliac screws combined with a lumbar iliac fixation in the treatment of vertical sacral fractures: a biomechanical finite element analysis

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of sacroiliac screw position and length on the biomechanical properties of triangular osteosynthesis in treating unilateral vertical sacral fractures and provide a clinical reference. METHODS: Unilateral Denis type II sacral fractures were modelled using finite eleme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Yupeng, Huang, Tao, Liu, Weiwei, Hong, Huanyu, Zhao, Yong, Lin, Jiangtao, Li, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37737168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06884-y
_version_ 1785108945943134208
author Ma, Yupeng
Huang, Tao
Liu, Weiwei
Hong, Huanyu
Zhao, Yong
Lin, Jiangtao
Li, Yu
author_facet Ma, Yupeng
Huang, Tao
Liu, Weiwei
Hong, Huanyu
Zhao, Yong
Lin, Jiangtao
Li, Yu
author_sort Ma, Yupeng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of sacroiliac screw position and length on the biomechanical properties of triangular osteosynthesis in treating unilateral vertical sacral fractures and provide a clinical reference. METHODS: Unilateral Denis type II sacral fractures were modelled using finite elements to represent Tile C pelvic ring injuries. Six sacroiliac screws were used with iliolumbar fixation patterns to fix the sacral fractures, and the sacral stability, maximum pressure, and stress distribution were compared among the internal fixation modalities. RESULTS: The best vertical stability of the internal fixation model was achieved when the S1 segment was fixed with lengthened sacroiliac screws, followed by when the S1 segment was fixed using normal sacroiliac screws. There was no significant difference in vertical stability between the S1 + S2 dual-segment fixation model and the S1-segment fixation model. The maximum pressure under a vertical force of 600 N showed a trend of L5LS1 < L5NS1 < L5LS12 < L5LS2 < L5NS2 < L5NS12. CONCLUSIONS: In unilateral vertical sacral fractures (Denis II) treated with triangular osteosynthesis using triangular jointing combined with unilateral iliolumbar + sacroiliac screw fixation, the use of a single lengthened sacroiliac screw for the S1 segment is recommended to achieve the best vertical stability of the sacrum with less maximum compression on the internal fixation components. If it is not possible to apply a lengthened sacroiliac screw, the use of a normal sacroiliac screw for the S1 segment is recommended. Adding an S2 screw does not significantly increase the vertical stability of the sacrum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10515427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105154272023-09-23 Biomechanical effects of S1 sacroiliac screws versus S2 sacroiliac screws on sacroiliac screws combined with a lumbar iliac fixation in the treatment of vertical sacral fractures: a biomechanical finite element analysis Ma, Yupeng Huang, Tao Liu, Weiwei Hong, Huanyu Zhao, Yong Lin, Jiangtao Li, Yu BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of sacroiliac screw position and length on the biomechanical properties of triangular osteosynthesis in treating unilateral vertical sacral fractures and provide a clinical reference. METHODS: Unilateral Denis type II sacral fractures were modelled using finite elements to represent Tile C pelvic ring injuries. Six sacroiliac screws were used with iliolumbar fixation patterns to fix the sacral fractures, and the sacral stability, maximum pressure, and stress distribution were compared among the internal fixation modalities. RESULTS: The best vertical stability of the internal fixation model was achieved when the S1 segment was fixed with lengthened sacroiliac screws, followed by when the S1 segment was fixed using normal sacroiliac screws. There was no significant difference in vertical stability between the S1 + S2 dual-segment fixation model and the S1-segment fixation model. The maximum pressure under a vertical force of 600 N showed a trend of L5LS1 < L5NS1 < L5LS12 < L5LS2 < L5NS2 < L5NS12. CONCLUSIONS: In unilateral vertical sacral fractures (Denis II) treated with triangular osteosynthesis using triangular jointing combined with unilateral iliolumbar + sacroiliac screw fixation, the use of a single lengthened sacroiliac screw for the S1 segment is recommended to achieve the best vertical stability of the sacrum with less maximum compression on the internal fixation components. If it is not possible to apply a lengthened sacroiliac screw, the use of a normal sacroiliac screw for the S1 segment is recommended. Adding an S2 screw does not significantly increase the vertical stability of the sacrum. BioMed Central 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10515427/ /pubmed/37737168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06884-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ma, Yupeng
Huang, Tao
Liu, Weiwei
Hong, Huanyu
Zhao, Yong
Lin, Jiangtao
Li, Yu
Biomechanical effects of S1 sacroiliac screws versus S2 sacroiliac screws on sacroiliac screws combined with a lumbar iliac fixation in the treatment of vertical sacral fractures: a biomechanical finite element analysis
title Biomechanical effects of S1 sacroiliac screws versus S2 sacroiliac screws on sacroiliac screws combined with a lumbar iliac fixation in the treatment of vertical sacral fractures: a biomechanical finite element analysis
title_full Biomechanical effects of S1 sacroiliac screws versus S2 sacroiliac screws on sacroiliac screws combined with a lumbar iliac fixation in the treatment of vertical sacral fractures: a biomechanical finite element analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical effects of S1 sacroiliac screws versus S2 sacroiliac screws on sacroiliac screws combined with a lumbar iliac fixation in the treatment of vertical sacral fractures: a biomechanical finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical effects of S1 sacroiliac screws versus S2 sacroiliac screws on sacroiliac screws combined with a lumbar iliac fixation in the treatment of vertical sacral fractures: a biomechanical finite element analysis
title_short Biomechanical effects of S1 sacroiliac screws versus S2 sacroiliac screws on sacroiliac screws combined with a lumbar iliac fixation in the treatment of vertical sacral fractures: a biomechanical finite element analysis
title_sort biomechanical effects of s1 sacroiliac screws versus s2 sacroiliac screws on sacroiliac screws combined with a lumbar iliac fixation in the treatment of vertical sacral fractures: a biomechanical finite element analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37737168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06884-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mayupeng biomechanicaleffectsofs1sacroiliacscrewsversuss2sacroiliacscrewsonsacroiliacscrewscombinedwithalumbariliacfixationinthetreatmentofverticalsacralfracturesabiomechanicalfiniteelementanalysis
AT huangtao biomechanicaleffectsofs1sacroiliacscrewsversuss2sacroiliacscrewsonsacroiliacscrewscombinedwithalumbariliacfixationinthetreatmentofverticalsacralfracturesabiomechanicalfiniteelementanalysis
AT liuweiwei biomechanicaleffectsofs1sacroiliacscrewsversuss2sacroiliacscrewsonsacroiliacscrewscombinedwithalumbariliacfixationinthetreatmentofverticalsacralfracturesabiomechanicalfiniteelementanalysis
AT honghuanyu biomechanicaleffectsofs1sacroiliacscrewsversuss2sacroiliacscrewsonsacroiliacscrewscombinedwithalumbariliacfixationinthetreatmentofverticalsacralfracturesabiomechanicalfiniteelementanalysis
AT zhaoyong biomechanicaleffectsofs1sacroiliacscrewsversuss2sacroiliacscrewsonsacroiliacscrewscombinedwithalumbariliacfixationinthetreatmentofverticalsacralfracturesabiomechanicalfiniteelementanalysis
AT linjiangtao biomechanicaleffectsofs1sacroiliacscrewsversuss2sacroiliacscrewsonsacroiliacscrewscombinedwithalumbariliacfixationinthetreatmentofverticalsacralfracturesabiomechanicalfiniteelementanalysis
AT liyu biomechanicaleffectsofs1sacroiliacscrewsversuss2sacroiliacscrewsonsacroiliacscrewscombinedwithalumbariliacfixationinthetreatmentofverticalsacralfracturesabiomechanicalfiniteelementanalysis