Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) is a zoonotic disease that has become a global pandemic. The fast evolution of the COVID‐19 pandemic and persist problems make COVID‐19 highly infectious; publicly accessible literature and other sources of information continue to expand in volume. The m...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.1000 |
_version_ | 1785108962875539456 |
---|---|
author | Yan, Cai Hu, Minjie Dai, Rongjuan |
author_facet | Yan, Cai Hu, Minjie Dai, Rongjuan |
author_sort | Yan, Cai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) is a zoonotic disease that has become a global pandemic. The fast evolution of the COVID‐19 pandemic and persist problems make COVID‐19 highly infectious; publicly accessible literature and other sources of information continue to expand in volume. The mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy efficacy for COVID‐19 is debatable. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta‐analysis (SRMA) aimed to evaluate the usefulness of MSCs in treating COVID‐19. METHODS: Relevant publications were retrieved from databases up to April 30, 2022. In the case of dichotomous data, the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were estimated with a random effects model (REM) or fixed effects model (FEM). The pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% CIs were calculated with REM or FEM in continuous data. In the outcomes, studies with insufficient or unusable data were reported descriptively. RESULTS: A total of eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 464 people were chosen for this SRMA. Relative to the control group, mortality was significantly lower in the MSCs group (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.99, Z = 2.01, p = .04); other secondary outcomes, such as the clinical symptom improvement rate improved in the MSCs group (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.99, Z = 2.24, p = .03), clinical symptom improvement time (MD: −4.01, 95% CI: −6.33, −1.68, Z = 3.38, p = .0007), C‐reactive protein (CRP) (MD: −39.16, 95% CI: −44.39, −33.94, Z = 14.70, p < .00001) and days to hospital discharge (MD: −3.83, 95% CI: −6.19, −1.48, Z = 3.19, p = .001) reduced significantly in MSCs group. However, the adverse reaction incidence did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: MSCs are a viable therapy option for COVID‐19 because of their safety and potential efficacy. With no significant adverse effects, MSCs can reduce mortality, clinical symptom improvement time, and days to hospital discharge, improve clinical symptoms, and reduce inflammatory cytokines CRP in COVID‐19. However, further high‐quality clinical studies are required to confirm these results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10515507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105155072023-09-23 Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Yan, Cai Hu, Minjie Dai, Rongjuan Immun Inflamm Dis Review Article BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) is a zoonotic disease that has become a global pandemic. The fast evolution of the COVID‐19 pandemic and persist problems make COVID‐19 highly infectious; publicly accessible literature and other sources of information continue to expand in volume. The mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy efficacy for COVID‐19 is debatable. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta‐analysis (SRMA) aimed to evaluate the usefulness of MSCs in treating COVID‐19. METHODS: Relevant publications were retrieved from databases up to April 30, 2022. In the case of dichotomous data, the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were estimated with a random effects model (REM) or fixed effects model (FEM). The pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% CIs were calculated with REM or FEM in continuous data. In the outcomes, studies with insufficient or unusable data were reported descriptively. RESULTS: A total of eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 464 people were chosen for this SRMA. Relative to the control group, mortality was significantly lower in the MSCs group (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.99, Z = 2.01, p = .04); other secondary outcomes, such as the clinical symptom improvement rate improved in the MSCs group (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.99, Z = 2.24, p = .03), clinical symptom improvement time (MD: −4.01, 95% CI: −6.33, −1.68, Z = 3.38, p = .0007), C‐reactive protein (CRP) (MD: −39.16, 95% CI: −44.39, −33.94, Z = 14.70, p < .00001) and days to hospital discharge (MD: −3.83, 95% CI: −6.19, −1.48, Z = 3.19, p = .001) reduced significantly in MSCs group. However, the adverse reaction incidence did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: MSCs are a viable therapy option for COVID‐19 because of their safety and potential efficacy. With no significant adverse effects, MSCs can reduce mortality, clinical symptom improvement time, and days to hospital discharge, improve clinical symptoms, and reduce inflammatory cytokines CRP in COVID‐19. However, further high‐quality clinical studies are required to confirm these results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10515507/ /pubmed/37773722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.1000 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Immunity, Inflammation and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Yan, Cai Hu, Minjie Dai, Rongjuan Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in covid‐19 patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.1000 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yancai safetyandefficacyofmesenchymalstemcellsincovid19patientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huminjie safetyandefficacyofmesenchymalstemcellsincovid19patientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dairongjuan safetyandefficacyofmesenchymalstemcellsincovid19patientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |