Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) is a zoonotic disease that has become a global pandemic. The fast evolution of the COVID‐19 pandemic and persist problems make COVID‐19 highly infectious; publicly accessible literature and other sources of information continue to expand in volume. The m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Cai, Hu, Minjie, Dai, Rongjuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.1000
_version_ 1785108962875539456
author Yan, Cai
Hu, Minjie
Dai, Rongjuan
author_facet Yan, Cai
Hu, Minjie
Dai, Rongjuan
author_sort Yan, Cai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) is a zoonotic disease that has become a global pandemic. The fast evolution of the COVID‐19 pandemic and persist problems make COVID‐19 highly infectious; publicly accessible literature and other sources of information continue to expand in volume. The mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy efficacy for COVID‐19 is debatable. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta‐analysis (SRMA) aimed to evaluate the usefulness of MSCs in treating COVID‐19. METHODS: Relevant publications were retrieved from databases up to April 30, 2022. In the case of dichotomous data, the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were estimated with a random effects model (REM) or fixed effects model (FEM). The pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% CIs were calculated with REM or FEM in continuous data. In the outcomes, studies with insufficient or unusable data were reported descriptively. RESULTS: A total of eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 464 people were chosen for this SRMA. Relative to the control group, mortality was significantly lower in the MSCs group (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.99, Z = 2.01, p = .04); other secondary outcomes, such as the clinical symptom improvement rate improved in the MSCs group (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.99, Z = 2.24, p = .03), clinical symptom improvement time (MD: −4.01, 95% CI: −6.33, −1.68, Z = 3.38, p = .0007), C‐reactive protein (CRP) (MD: −39.16, 95% CI: −44.39, −33.94, Z = 14.70, p < .00001) and days to hospital discharge (MD: −3.83, 95% CI: −6.19, −1.48, Z = 3.19, p = .001) reduced significantly in MSCs group. However, the adverse reaction incidence did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: MSCs are a viable therapy option for COVID‐19 because of their safety and potential efficacy. With no significant adverse effects, MSCs can reduce mortality, clinical symptom improvement time, and days to hospital discharge, improve clinical symptoms, and reduce inflammatory cytokines CRP in COVID‐19. However, further high‐quality clinical studies are required to confirm these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10515507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105155072023-09-23 Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Yan, Cai Hu, Minjie Dai, Rongjuan Immun Inflamm Dis Review Article BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) is a zoonotic disease that has become a global pandemic. The fast evolution of the COVID‐19 pandemic and persist problems make COVID‐19 highly infectious; publicly accessible literature and other sources of information continue to expand in volume. The mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy efficacy for COVID‐19 is debatable. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta‐analysis (SRMA) aimed to evaluate the usefulness of MSCs in treating COVID‐19. METHODS: Relevant publications were retrieved from databases up to April 30, 2022. In the case of dichotomous data, the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were estimated with a random effects model (REM) or fixed effects model (FEM). The pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% CIs were calculated with REM or FEM in continuous data. In the outcomes, studies with insufficient or unusable data were reported descriptively. RESULTS: A total of eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 464 people were chosen for this SRMA. Relative to the control group, mortality was significantly lower in the MSCs group (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.99, Z = 2.01, p = .04); other secondary outcomes, such as the clinical symptom improvement rate improved in the MSCs group (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.99, Z = 2.24, p = .03), clinical symptom improvement time (MD: −4.01, 95% CI: −6.33, −1.68, Z = 3.38, p = .0007), C‐reactive protein (CRP) (MD: −39.16, 95% CI: −44.39, −33.94, Z = 14.70, p < .00001) and days to hospital discharge (MD: −3.83, 95% CI: −6.19, −1.48, Z = 3.19, p = .001) reduced significantly in MSCs group. However, the adverse reaction incidence did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: MSCs are a viable therapy option for COVID‐19 because of their safety and potential efficacy. With no significant adverse effects, MSCs can reduce mortality, clinical symptom improvement time, and days to hospital discharge, improve clinical symptoms, and reduce inflammatory cytokines CRP in COVID‐19. However, further high‐quality clinical studies are required to confirm these results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10515507/ /pubmed/37773722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.1000 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Immunity, Inflammation and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Yan, Cai
Hu, Minjie
Dai, Rongjuan
Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in covid‐19 patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.1000
work_keys_str_mv AT yancai safetyandefficacyofmesenchymalstemcellsincovid19patientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huminjie safetyandefficacyofmesenchymalstemcellsincovid19patientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dairongjuan safetyandefficacyofmesenchymalstemcellsincovid19patientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis