Cargando…

Port Site Morbidities Following the Extraction of the Gallbladder from the Umbilical Port in Comparison to the Epigastric Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Port site morbidities after laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be related to the port used for the extraction of the gallbladder. Prior randomized trials that tried to address the suitable port for gallbladder extraction showed mixed results favouring epigastric, whereas others favoured umb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anand, Atul, Jha, Ashesh k, Kumar, Manoj, Kumar, Subhash, Kumar, Pragya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745735
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45770
_version_ 1785108998362497024
author Anand, Atul
Jha, Ashesh k
Kumar, Manoj
Kumar, Subhash
Kumar, Pragya
author_facet Anand, Atul
Jha, Ashesh k
Kumar, Manoj
Kumar, Subhash
Kumar, Pragya
author_sort Anand, Atul
collection PubMed
description Background Port site morbidities after laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be related to the port used for the extraction of the gallbladder. Prior randomized trials that tried to address the suitable port for gallbladder extraction showed mixed results favouring epigastric, whereas others favoured umbilical. Thus, the present study was conducted with the aim of finding a suitable port for gallbladder extraction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methodology A total of 104 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to either the epigastric (Group 1) or umbilical (Group 2) port group for gallbladder extraction. Post-operative pain (by visual analogue scale (VAS)), the frequency of surgical site infection (SSI), and port site herniation were compared. Results Post-operative pain was lower in the umbilical port group in the initial 24 hours. The SSIs and port site herniation rates were lower in the umbilical port group; however, they were statistically not significant. Conclusion Less post-operative pain at the umbilical port may help with the early discharge of patients. In contrast to other studies, our trial had fewer infections and hernias in the umbilical port group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10515674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105156742023-09-23 Port Site Morbidities Following the Extraction of the Gallbladder from the Umbilical Port in Comparison to the Epigastric Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial Anand, Atul Jha, Ashesh k Kumar, Manoj Kumar, Subhash Kumar, Pragya Cureus General Surgery Background Port site morbidities after laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be related to the port used for the extraction of the gallbladder. Prior randomized trials that tried to address the suitable port for gallbladder extraction showed mixed results favouring epigastric, whereas others favoured umbilical. Thus, the present study was conducted with the aim of finding a suitable port for gallbladder extraction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methodology A total of 104 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to either the epigastric (Group 1) or umbilical (Group 2) port group for gallbladder extraction. Post-operative pain (by visual analogue scale (VAS)), the frequency of surgical site infection (SSI), and port site herniation were compared. Results Post-operative pain was lower in the umbilical port group in the initial 24 hours. The SSIs and port site herniation rates were lower in the umbilical port group; however, they were statistically not significant. Conclusion Less post-operative pain at the umbilical port may help with the early discharge of patients. In contrast to other studies, our trial had fewer infections and hernias in the umbilical port group. Cureus 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10515674/ /pubmed/37745735 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45770 Text en Copyright © 2023, Anand et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle General Surgery
Anand, Atul
Jha, Ashesh k
Kumar, Manoj
Kumar, Subhash
Kumar, Pragya
Port Site Morbidities Following the Extraction of the Gallbladder from the Umbilical Port in Comparison to the Epigastric Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
title Port Site Morbidities Following the Extraction of the Gallbladder from the Umbilical Port in Comparison to the Epigastric Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Port Site Morbidities Following the Extraction of the Gallbladder from the Umbilical Port in Comparison to the Epigastric Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Port Site Morbidities Following the Extraction of the Gallbladder from the Umbilical Port in Comparison to the Epigastric Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Port Site Morbidities Following the Extraction of the Gallbladder from the Umbilical Port in Comparison to the Epigastric Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Port Site Morbidities Following the Extraction of the Gallbladder from the Umbilical Port in Comparison to the Epigastric Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort port site morbidities following the extraction of the gallbladder from the umbilical port in comparison to the epigastric port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
topic General Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37745735
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45770
work_keys_str_mv AT anandatul portsitemorbiditiesfollowingtheextractionofthegallbladderfromtheumbilicalportincomparisontotheepigastricportinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jhaasheshk portsitemorbiditiesfollowingtheextractionofthegallbladderfromtheumbilicalportincomparisontotheepigastricportinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kumarmanoj portsitemorbiditiesfollowingtheextractionofthegallbladderfromtheumbilicalportincomparisontotheepigastricportinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kumarsubhash portsitemorbiditiesfollowingtheextractionofthegallbladderfromtheumbilicalportincomparisontotheepigastricportinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kumarpragya portsitemorbiditiesfollowingtheextractionofthegallbladderfromtheumbilicalportincomparisontotheepigastricportinlaparoscopiccholecystectomyadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial