Cargando…

Global Surgeon Opinion on the Impact of Surgical Access When Using Endocutters Across Specialties

Background: Despite design enhancements in endocutters, key challenges related to limited surgical access and space can impact stapling and, potentially, surgical outcomes. Objectives: This study aimed to develop consensus statements outlining the clinical value of precise articulation and greater a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gutierrez, Marina, Jamous, Nadine, Petraiuolo, William, Roy, Sanjoy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37744691
http://dx.doi.org/10.36469/001c.87644
_version_ 1785109038375108608
author Gutierrez, Marina
Jamous, Nadine
Petraiuolo, William
Roy, Sanjoy
author_facet Gutierrez, Marina
Jamous, Nadine
Petraiuolo, William
Roy, Sanjoy
author_sort Gutierrez, Marina
collection PubMed
description Background: Despite design enhancements in endocutters, key challenges related to limited surgical access and space can impact stapling and, potentially, surgical outcomes. Objectives: This study aimed to develop consensus statements outlining the clinical value of precise articulation and greater anatomical access in minimally invasive surgery performed by bariatric, colorectal, and thoracic surgeons. Methods: Colorectal, bariatric, and thoracic surgeons from Japan, the United States, United Kingdom, and France participated in a 2-round modified Delphi panel. Round 1 included binary, Likert scale–type, multiple-response, and open-ended questions. These were converted to affirmative statements for round 2 if sufficient agreement was reached. Consensus was set at a predefined threshold of at least 90% of panelists across all surgical specialties and regions selecting the same option (“agree” or “disagree”) for the affirmative statements. Results: Of the 49 statements in the round 2 questionnaire, panelists (n=135) reached consensus that (1) tissue slippage outside stapler jaws can occur due to limited access and space; (2) greater jaw aperture could help to manipulate thick or fragile tissue more easily; (3) articulation of an endocutter is clinically important in laparoscopic surgeries; (4) improved access to hard-to-reach targets and in limited space would improve safety; and (5) an endocutter with improved access through greater articulation would become common use. Discussion: By understanding user-specific challenges and needs from both specialty- and region-wide perspectives, endoscopic stapling devices can continue to be refined. In this study, improved articulation and greater jaw aperture were the key design features examined. Improved articulation and greater jaw aperture were key stapler design features identified in this study that may mitigate the risk of instrument clashes and intraoperative complications such as anastomotic leaks. Conclusions: This study gained insights into surgeons’ perspective across a variety of specialties and from 3 distinct geographies. Participating surgeons reached consensus that an endocutter with greater jaw aperture and articulation may improve surgical access and has potential to improve surgical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10515882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105158822023-09-23 Global Surgeon Opinion on the Impact of Surgical Access When Using Endocutters Across Specialties Gutierrez, Marina Jamous, Nadine Petraiuolo, William Roy, Sanjoy J Health Econ Outcomes Res General Indications Background: Despite design enhancements in endocutters, key challenges related to limited surgical access and space can impact stapling and, potentially, surgical outcomes. Objectives: This study aimed to develop consensus statements outlining the clinical value of precise articulation and greater anatomical access in minimally invasive surgery performed by bariatric, colorectal, and thoracic surgeons. Methods: Colorectal, bariatric, and thoracic surgeons from Japan, the United States, United Kingdom, and France participated in a 2-round modified Delphi panel. Round 1 included binary, Likert scale–type, multiple-response, and open-ended questions. These were converted to affirmative statements for round 2 if sufficient agreement was reached. Consensus was set at a predefined threshold of at least 90% of panelists across all surgical specialties and regions selecting the same option (“agree” or “disagree”) for the affirmative statements. Results: Of the 49 statements in the round 2 questionnaire, panelists (n=135) reached consensus that (1) tissue slippage outside stapler jaws can occur due to limited access and space; (2) greater jaw aperture could help to manipulate thick or fragile tissue more easily; (3) articulation of an endocutter is clinically important in laparoscopic surgeries; (4) improved access to hard-to-reach targets and in limited space would improve safety; and (5) an endocutter with improved access through greater articulation would become common use. Discussion: By understanding user-specific challenges and needs from both specialty- and region-wide perspectives, endoscopic stapling devices can continue to be refined. In this study, improved articulation and greater jaw aperture were the key design features examined. Improved articulation and greater jaw aperture were key stapler design features identified in this study that may mitigate the risk of instrument clashes and intraoperative complications such as anastomotic leaks. Conclusions: This study gained insights into surgeons’ perspective across a variety of specialties and from 3 distinct geographies. Participating surgeons reached consensus that an endocutter with greater jaw aperture and articulation may improve surgical access and has potential to improve surgical outcomes. Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10515882/ /pubmed/37744691 http://dx.doi.org/10.36469/001c.87644 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle General Indications
Gutierrez, Marina
Jamous, Nadine
Petraiuolo, William
Roy, Sanjoy
Global Surgeon Opinion on the Impact of Surgical Access When Using Endocutters Across Specialties
title Global Surgeon Opinion on the Impact of Surgical Access When Using Endocutters Across Specialties
title_full Global Surgeon Opinion on the Impact of Surgical Access When Using Endocutters Across Specialties
title_fullStr Global Surgeon Opinion on the Impact of Surgical Access When Using Endocutters Across Specialties
title_full_unstemmed Global Surgeon Opinion on the Impact of Surgical Access When Using Endocutters Across Specialties
title_short Global Surgeon Opinion on the Impact of Surgical Access When Using Endocutters Across Specialties
title_sort global surgeon opinion on the impact of surgical access when using endocutters across specialties
topic General Indications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37744691
http://dx.doi.org/10.36469/001c.87644
work_keys_str_mv AT gutierrezmarina globalsurgeonopinionontheimpactofsurgicalaccesswhenusingendocuttersacrossspecialties
AT jamousnadine globalsurgeonopinionontheimpactofsurgicalaccesswhenusingendocuttersacrossspecialties
AT petraiuolowilliam globalsurgeonopinionontheimpactofsurgicalaccesswhenusingendocuttersacrossspecialties
AT roysanjoy globalsurgeonopinionontheimpactofsurgicalaccesswhenusingendocuttersacrossspecialties