Cargando…
Evaluation of primary health care by users during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the primary health care (PHC) attributes and associated factors during the COVID-19 pandemic using the perspective of users. METHODS: This cross-sectional, quantitative study included 422 PHC users from 96 Family Health Teams in a city in Brazil. The assessment used the Primar...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10516436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37738255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292039 |
_version_ | 1785109127887847424 |
---|---|
author | Celino, Suely Deysny de Matos de Albuquerque Filho, Nailton José Brandão Gomes, Monalisa da Nóbrega Cesarino Costa, Gabriela Maria Cavalcanti de Mendonça, Ana Elza Oliveira |
author_facet | Celino, Suely Deysny de Matos de Albuquerque Filho, Nailton José Brandão Gomes, Monalisa da Nóbrega Cesarino Costa, Gabriela Maria Cavalcanti de Mendonça, Ana Elza Oliveira |
author_sort | Celino, Suely Deysny de Matos |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the primary health care (PHC) attributes and associated factors during the COVID-19 pandemic using the perspective of users. METHODS: This cross-sectional, quantitative study included 422 PHC users from 96 Family Health Teams in a city in Brazil. The assessment used the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) and a structured questionnaire on the sociodemographic and epidemiological characteristics of users and basic health units (BHU). The Person’s chi-square test was used to analyze the association between high overall scores in PCATool and characteristics of users and BHU. Crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) with a 95% confidence interval were also calculated. Poisson regression and Rao Scott’s Chi-square test were used to estimate crude PR. RESULTS: Most users were aged 30 to 39 years (26.3%), women (75.4%), registered at the BHU for over ten years (59.5%), and had incomplete secondary education (30.6%). The mean of PHC essential attributes and overall scores were low (6.10 ± 0.81 and 5.78 ± 0.77, respectively). "First-contact care–use" received the highest score (9.22 ± 1.62), while "first-contact care–accessibility" received the lowest (2.82 ± 0.90). High overall scores were associated with an average employment time of professionals (doctors and nurses) at the BHU (PR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.17–1.48; p < 0.001) and lower educational level of users (PR = 1.71; 95% CI 1.54–1.90; p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: "First-contact care–use" was the best evaluated, while "first-contact care–accessibility" was the worst. High scores were associated with a lower educational level of users and BHU with more experienced professionals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10516436 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105164362023-09-23 Evaluation of primary health care by users during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study Celino, Suely Deysny de Matos de Albuquerque Filho, Nailton José Brandão Gomes, Monalisa da Nóbrega Cesarino Costa, Gabriela Maria Cavalcanti de Mendonça, Ana Elza Oliveira PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the primary health care (PHC) attributes and associated factors during the COVID-19 pandemic using the perspective of users. METHODS: This cross-sectional, quantitative study included 422 PHC users from 96 Family Health Teams in a city in Brazil. The assessment used the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) and a structured questionnaire on the sociodemographic and epidemiological characteristics of users and basic health units (BHU). The Person’s chi-square test was used to analyze the association between high overall scores in PCATool and characteristics of users and BHU. Crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) with a 95% confidence interval were also calculated. Poisson regression and Rao Scott’s Chi-square test were used to estimate crude PR. RESULTS: Most users were aged 30 to 39 years (26.3%), women (75.4%), registered at the BHU for over ten years (59.5%), and had incomplete secondary education (30.6%). The mean of PHC essential attributes and overall scores were low (6.10 ± 0.81 and 5.78 ± 0.77, respectively). "First-contact care–use" received the highest score (9.22 ± 1.62), while "first-contact care–accessibility" received the lowest (2.82 ± 0.90). High overall scores were associated with an average employment time of professionals (doctors and nurses) at the BHU (PR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.17–1.48; p < 0.001) and lower educational level of users (PR = 1.71; 95% CI 1.54–1.90; p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: "First-contact care–use" was the best evaluated, while "first-contact care–accessibility" was the worst. High scores were associated with a lower educational level of users and BHU with more experienced professionals. Public Library of Science 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10516436/ /pubmed/37738255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292039 Text en © 2023 Celino et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Celino, Suely Deysny de Matos de Albuquerque Filho, Nailton José Brandão Gomes, Monalisa da Nóbrega Cesarino Costa, Gabriela Maria Cavalcanti de Mendonça, Ana Elza Oliveira Evaluation of primary health care by users during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study |
title | Evaluation of primary health care by users during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study |
title_full | Evaluation of primary health care by users during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of primary health care by users during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of primary health care by users during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study |
title_short | Evaluation of primary health care by users during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study |
title_sort | evaluation of primary health care by users during the covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10516436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37738255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT celinosuelydeysnydematos evaluationofprimaryhealthcarebyusersduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalstudy AT dealbuquerquefilhonailtonjosebrandao evaluationofprimaryhealthcarebyusersduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalstudy AT gomesmonalisadanobregacesarino evaluationofprimaryhealthcarebyusersduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalstudy AT costagabrielamariacavalcanti evaluationofprimaryhealthcarebyusersduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalstudy AT demendoncaanaelzaoliveira evaluationofprimaryhealthcarebyusersduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalstudy |