Cargando…

Patient and public involvement in pragmatic trials: online survey of corresponding authors of published trials

BACKGROUND: There are few data on patient and public involvement (PPI) in pragmatic trials. We aimed to describe the prevalence and nature of PPI within pragmatic trials, describe variation in prevalence of PPI by trial characteristics and compare prevalence of PPI reported by trial authors to that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Vanderhout, Shelley, Nevins, Pascale, Nicholls, Stuart G., Macarthur, Colin, Brehaut, Jamie C., Potter, Beth K., Gillies, Kate, Goulao, Beatriz, Smith, Maureen, Hilderley, Alicia, Carroll, Kelly, Spinewine, Anne, Weijer, Charles, Fergusson, Dean A., Taljaard, Monica
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	CMA Impact Inc. 2023
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10516685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37726115 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220198

Ejemplares similares

Reporting of and explanations for under-recruitment and over-recruitment in pragmatic trials: a secondary analysis of a database of primary trial reports published from 2014 to 2019
por: Nevins, Pascale, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Informed Consent in Pragmatic Trials: Results from a Survey of Trials published 2014–2019
por: Zhang, Jennifer Zhe, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Patient-reported outcomes and target effect sizes in pragmatic randomized trials in ClinicalTrials.gov: A cross-sectional analysis
por: Vanderhout, Shelley, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders
por: Nicholls, Stuart G., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Patient Partner Perspectives Regarding Ethically and Clinically Important Aspects of Trial Design in Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials for Hemodialysis
por: Nicholls, Stuart G., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation
por: Goldstein, Cory E., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol
por: Nicholls, Stuart G., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Ethical Issues in the Design and Conduct of Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials in Hemodialysis Care: An Interview Study With Key Stakeholders
por: Nicholls, Stuart G., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Health equity considerations in pragmatic trials in Alzheimer's and dementia disease: Results from a methodological review
por: Nicholls, Stuart G., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Ethical considerations within pragmatic randomized controlled trials in dementia: Results from a literature survey
por: Nicholls, Stuart G., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management
por: Giraudeau, Bruno, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol
por: Taljaard, Monica, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Inadequate reporting of research ethics review and informed consent in cluster randomised trials: review of random sample of published trials
por: Taljaard, Monica, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Informed consent in cluster randomised trials: a guide for the perplexed
por: Nix, Hayden P, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reporting of key methodological and ethical aspects of cluster trials in hemodialysis require improvement: a systematic review
por: Al-Jaishi, Ahmed A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials
por: Weijer, Charles, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

A Scoping Review of Empirical Research Relating to Quality and Effectiveness of Research Ethics Review
por: Nicholls, Stuart G., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Changing patient preferences toward better trial recruitment: an ethical analysis
por: Al, Pepijn, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

FLUID trial: a protocol for a hospital-wide open-label cluster crossover pragmatic comparative effectiveness randomised pilot trial
por: McIntyre, Lauralyn, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Pragmatic Strategy Empowering Paramedics to Assess Low-Risk Trauma Patients With the Canadian C-Spine Rule and Selectively Transport Them Without Immobilization: Protocol for a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial
por: Vaillancourt, Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Dissemination of trial results to participants in phase III pragmatic clinical trials: an audit of trial investigators intentions
por: Raza, M Zulfiqar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

How can behavioural science help us design better trials?
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

TwiC or treat? Are trials within cohorts ethically defensible?
por: Weijer, Charles, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles
por: Goldstein, Cory E., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Facilitating and supporting the engagement of patients, families and caregivers in research: the “Ottawa model” for patient engagement in research
por: Vanderhout, Shelley, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

FLUID trial: a hospital-wide open-label cluster cross-over pragmatic comparative effectiveness randomised pilot trial comparing normal saline to Ringer’s lactate
por: McIntyre, Lauralyn Ann, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Mail merge can be used to create personalized questionnaires in complex surveys
por: Taljaard, Monica, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

How to design efficient cluster randomised trials
por: Hemming, K, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Does clinical equipoise apply to cluster randomized trials in health research?
por: Binik, Ariella, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

When is informed consent required in cluster randomized trials in health research?
por: McRae, Andrew D, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Patient and public involvement in numerical aspects of trials: a mixed methods theory-informed survey of trialists’ current practices, barriers and facilitators
por: Goulao, Beatriz, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Variability in research ethics review of cluster randomized trials: a scenario-based survey in three countries
por: Taljaard, Monica, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Researchers’ perceptions of ethical challenges in cluster randomized trials: a qualitative analysis
por: McRae, Andrew D, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Who is the research subject in cluster randomized trials in health research?
por: McRae, Andrew D, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Ethical issues posed by cluster randomized trials in health research
por: Weijer, Charles, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Parent engagement in co-design of clinical trials: the PARENT trial
por: Vanderloo, Leigh M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

How do we know a treatment is good enough? A survey of non-inferiority trials
por: Attard, Naomi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

What is the role and authority of gatekeepers in cluster randomized trials in health research?
por: Gallo, Antonio, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Youth and family involvement in the development of a plain language trial results communication tool: CommuniKIDS
por: Baba, Ami, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials
por: Patsopoulos, Nikolaos A.
Publicado: (2011)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_rfsp75qq7nidtf648fh72okdie