Cargando…

A Machine Learning-Based Image Segmentation Method to Quantify In Vitro Osteoclast Culture Endpoints

Quantification of in vitro osteoclast cultures (e.g. cell number) often relies on manual counting methods. These approaches are labour intensive, time consuming and result in substantial inter- and intra-user variability. This study aimed to develop and validate an automated workflow to robustly qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, Bethan K., Hibbert, Andrew P., Roberts, Scott J., Roberts, Helen C., Tickner, Jennifer C., Holdsworth, Gill, Arnett, Timothy R., Orriss, Isabel R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10516805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37566229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-023-01121-z
_version_ 1785109205004320768
author Davies, Bethan K.
Hibbert, Andrew P.
Roberts, Scott J.
Roberts, Helen C.
Tickner, Jennifer C.
Holdsworth, Gill
Arnett, Timothy R.
Orriss, Isabel R.
author_facet Davies, Bethan K.
Hibbert, Andrew P.
Roberts, Scott J.
Roberts, Helen C.
Tickner, Jennifer C.
Holdsworth, Gill
Arnett, Timothy R.
Orriss, Isabel R.
author_sort Davies, Bethan K.
collection PubMed
description Quantification of in vitro osteoclast cultures (e.g. cell number) often relies on manual counting methods. These approaches are labour intensive, time consuming and result in substantial inter- and intra-user variability. This study aimed to develop and validate an automated workflow to robustly quantify in vitro osteoclast cultures. Using ilastik, a machine learning-based image analysis software, images of tartrate resistant acid phosphatase-stained mouse osteoclasts cultured on dentine discs were used to train the ilastik-based algorithm. Assessment of algorithm training showed that osteoclast numbers strongly correlated between manual- and automatically quantified values (r = 0.87). Osteoclasts were consistently faithfully segmented by the model when visually compared to the original reflective light images. The ability of this method to detect changes in osteoclast number in response to different treatments was validated using zoledronate, ticagrelor, and co-culture with MCF7 breast cancer cells. Manual and automated counting methods detected a 70% reduction (p < 0.05) in osteoclast number, when cultured with 10 nM zoledronate and a dose-dependent decrease with 1–10 μM ticagrelor (p < 0.05). Co-culture with MCF7 cells increased osteoclast number by ≥ 50% irrespective of quantification method. Overall, an automated image segmentation and analysis workflow, which consistently and sensitively identified in vitro osteoclasts, was developed. Advantages of this workflow are (1) significantly reduction in user variability of endpoint measurements (93%) and analysis time (80%); (2) detection of osteoclasts cultured on different substrates from different species; and (3) easy to use and freely available to use along with tutorial resources. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00223-023-01121-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10516805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105168052023-09-24 A Machine Learning-Based Image Segmentation Method to Quantify In Vitro Osteoclast Culture Endpoints Davies, Bethan K. Hibbert, Andrew P. Roberts, Scott J. Roberts, Helen C. Tickner, Jennifer C. Holdsworth, Gill Arnett, Timothy R. Orriss, Isabel R. Calcif Tissue Int Original Research Quantification of in vitro osteoclast cultures (e.g. cell number) often relies on manual counting methods. These approaches are labour intensive, time consuming and result in substantial inter- and intra-user variability. This study aimed to develop and validate an automated workflow to robustly quantify in vitro osteoclast cultures. Using ilastik, a machine learning-based image analysis software, images of tartrate resistant acid phosphatase-stained mouse osteoclasts cultured on dentine discs were used to train the ilastik-based algorithm. Assessment of algorithm training showed that osteoclast numbers strongly correlated between manual- and automatically quantified values (r = 0.87). Osteoclasts were consistently faithfully segmented by the model when visually compared to the original reflective light images. The ability of this method to detect changes in osteoclast number in response to different treatments was validated using zoledronate, ticagrelor, and co-culture with MCF7 breast cancer cells. Manual and automated counting methods detected a 70% reduction (p < 0.05) in osteoclast number, when cultured with 10 nM zoledronate and a dose-dependent decrease with 1–10 μM ticagrelor (p < 0.05). Co-culture with MCF7 cells increased osteoclast number by ≥ 50% irrespective of quantification method. Overall, an automated image segmentation and analysis workflow, which consistently and sensitively identified in vitro osteoclasts, was developed. Advantages of this workflow are (1) significantly reduction in user variability of endpoint measurements (93%) and analysis time (80%); (2) detection of osteoclasts cultured on different substrates from different species; and (3) easy to use and freely available to use along with tutorial resources. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00223-023-01121-z. Springer US 2023-08-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10516805/ /pubmed/37566229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-023-01121-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Davies, Bethan K.
Hibbert, Andrew P.
Roberts, Scott J.
Roberts, Helen C.
Tickner, Jennifer C.
Holdsworth, Gill
Arnett, Timothy R.
Orriss, Isabel R.
A Machine Learning-Based Image Segmentation Method to Quantify In Vitro Osteoclast Culture Endpoints
title A Machine Learning-Based Image Segmentation Method to Quantify In Vitro Osteoclast Culture Endpoints
title_full A Machine Learning-Based Image Segmentation Method to Quantify In Vitro Osteoclast Culture Endpoints
title_fullStr A Machine Learning-Based Image Segmentation Method to Quantify In Vitro Osteoclast Culture Endpoints
title_full_unstemmed A Machine Learning-Based Image Segmentation Method to Quantify In Vitro Osteoclast Culture Endpoints
title_short A Machine Learning-Based Image Segmentation Method to Quantify In Vitro Osteoclast Culture Endpoints
title_sort machine learning-based image segmentation method to quantify in vitro osteoclast culture endpoints
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10516805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37566229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-023-01121-z
work_keys_str_mv AT daviesbethank amachinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints
AT hibbertandrewp amachinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints
AT robertsscottj amachinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints
AT robertshelenc amachinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints
AT ticknerjenniferc amachinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints
AT holdsworthgill amachinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints
AT arnetttimothyr amachinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints
AT orrissisabelr amachinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints
AT daviesbethank machinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints
AT hibbertandrewp machinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints
AT robertsscottj machinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints
AT robertshelenc machinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints
AT ticknerjenniferc machinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints
AT holdsworthgill machinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints
AT arnetttimothyr machinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints
AT orrissisabelr machinelearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodtoquantifyinvitroosteoclastcultureendpoints