Cargando…

A comparative study between 10-MHz and 15-MHz ultrasound probes for retinal evaluation in silicone-oil-filled globes

PURPOSE: To compare 10-MHz and 15-MHz B-scan probes regarding the detection and localization of retinal detachment (RD) in silicone-oil-filled eyes. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included 100 eyes (98 patients) -having media opacity precluding fundus examination- scheduled for si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albadawi, Maha A., Allam, Riham S. H. M., Khalil, Noha M. M., Eissa, Iman M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10516990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02464-5
_version_ 1785109240201871360
author Albadawi, Maha A.
Allam, Riham S. H. M.
Khalil, Noha M. M.
Eissa, Iman M.
author_facet Albadawi, Maha A.
Allam, Riham S. H. M.
Khalil, Noha M. M.
Eissa, Iman M.
author_sort Albadawi, Maha A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare 10-MHz and 15-MHz B-scan probes regarding the detection and localization of retinal detachment (RD) in silicone-oil-filled eyes. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included 100 eyes (98 patients) -having media opacity precluding fundus examination- scheduled for silicone-oil removal. Patients were examined in the sitting-position using both frequencies one week preoperatively. Longitudinal and transverse scans were taken in primary-gaze, inferior, inferonasal, and inferotemporal positions to detect the presence/absence and extent of RD. Patients were sub-grouped according to axial lengths (AXLs), state of silicone emulsification, and globe filling. Agreement between sonographic and intraoperative observations was compared. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between 15-MHz and intra-operative findings regarding RD detection (P = 0.752) and accurate localization of inferior, inferonasal, and inferotemporal RD (P = 0.279, 0.606, and 0.599). There were statistically significant differences between 10-MHz and intra-operative findings regarding RD detection and localization (P < 0.001). The 15-MHz probe was superior to 10-MHz probe regarding the accuracy of RD detection and localization (94% and 47%, respectively). The accuracy of 15-MHz probe was 88%, 83%, and 85% in detecting and localizing inferior, inferonasal, and inferotemporal RD compared to 45%, 60%, and 62% with 10-MHz probe. The 15-MHz probe showed better sensitivity while 10-MHz probe showed better accuracy in eyes with short AXLs. The 10-MHz probe showed better sensitivity in patients with sonographic emulsification while15-MHz probe had better sensitivity in detecting vitreoretinal-interface disorders. CONCLUSION: The 15-MHz B-scan probe is more accurate in detecting and localizing recurrent RD in silicone-oil-filled globes with higher sensitivity in detecting vitreoretinal-interface disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10516990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105169902023-09-24 A comparative study between 10-MHz and 15-MHz ultrasound probes for retinal evaluation in silicone-oil-filled globes Albadawi, Maha A. Allam, Riham S. H. M. Khalil, Noha M. M. Eissa, Iman M. Eye (Lond) Article PURPOSE: To compare 10-MHz and 15-MHz B-scan probes regarding the detection and localization of retinal detachment (RD) in silicone-oil-filled eyes. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included 100 eyes (98 patients) -having media opacity precluding fundus examination- scheduled for silicone-oil removal. Patients were examined in the sitting-position using both frequencies one week preoperatively. Longitudinal and transverse scans were taken in primary-gaze, inferior, inferonasal, and inferotemporal positions to detect the presence/absence and extent of RD. Patients were sub-grouped according to axial lengths (AXLs), state of silicone emulsification, and globe filling. Agreement between sonographic and intraoperative observations was compared. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between 15-MHz and intra-operative findings regarding RD detection (P = 0.752) and accurate localization of inferior, inferonasal, and inferotemporal RD (P = 0.279, 0.606, and 0.599). There were statistically significant differences between 10-MHz and intra-operative findings regarding RD detection and localization (P < 0.001). The 15-MHz probe was superior to 10-MHz probe regarding the accuracy of RD detection and localization (94% and 47%, respectively). The accuracy of 15-MHz probe was 88%, 83%, and 85% in detecting and localizing inferior, inferonasal, and inferotemporal RD compared to 45%, 60%, and 62% with 10-MHz probe. The 15-MHz probe showed better sensitivity while 10-MHz probe showed better accuracy in eyes with short AXLs. The 10-MHz probe showed better sensitivity in patients with sonographic emulsification while15-MHz probe had better sensitivity in detecting vitreoretinal-interface disorders. CONCLUSION: The 15-MHz B-scan probe is more accurate in detecting and localizing recurrent RD in silicone-oil-filled globes with higher sensitivity in detecting vitreoretinal-interface disorders. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-06 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10516990/ /pubmed/36879162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02464-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Albadawi, Maha A.
Allam, Riham S. H. M.
Khalil, Noha M. M.
Eissa, Iman M.
A comparative study between 10-MHz and 15-MHz ultrasound probes for retinal evaluation in silicone-oil-filled globes
title A comparative study between 10-MHz and 15-MHz ultrasound probes for retinal evaluation in silicone-oil-filled globes
title_full A comparative study between 10-MHz and 15-MHz ultrasound probes for retinal evaluation in silicone-oil-filled globes
title_fullStr A comparative study between 10-MHz and 15-MHz ultrasound probes for retinal evaluation in silicone-oil-filled globes
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study between 10-MHz and 15-MHz ultrasound probes for retinal evaluation in silicone-oil-filled globes
title_short A comparative study between 10-MHz and 15-MHz ultrasound probes for retinal evaluation in silicone-oil-filled globes
title_sort comparative study between 10-mhz and 15-mhz ultrasound probes for retinal evaluation in silicone-oil-filled globes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10516990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02464-5
work_keys_str_mv AT albadawimahaa acomparativestudybetween10mhzand15mhzultrasoundprobesforretinalevaluationinsiliconeoilfilledglobes
AT allamrihamshm acomparativestudybetween10mhzand15mhzultrasoundprobesforretinalevaluationinsiliconeoilfilledglobes
AT khalilnohamm acomparativestudybetween10mhzand15mhzultrasoundprobesforretinalevaluationinsiliconeoilfilledglobes
AT eissaimanm acomparativestudybetween10mhzand15mhzultrasoundprobesforretinalevaluationinsiliconeoilfilledglobes
AT albadawimahaa comparativestudybetween10mhzand15mhzultrasoundprobesforretinalevaluationinsiliconeoilfilledglobes
AT allamrihamshm comparativestudybetween10mhzand15mhzultrasoundprobesforretinalevaluationinsiliconeoilfilledglobes
AT khalilnohamm comparativestudybetween10mhzand15mhzultrasoundprobesforretinalevaluationinsiliconeoilfilledglobes
AT eissaimanm comparativestudybetween10mhzand15mhzultrasoundprobesforretinalevaluationinsiliconeoilfilledglobes